View source for Gentry

{{about|a class of people|other uses|Gentry (disambiguation)}}
{{Short description|People of high social class, in particular of the land-owning social class}}
[[File:Cleric-Knight-Workman.jpg|right|thumb|Cleric, knight, and peasant archetypes represent the virtues of [[prudence]], [[Courage|fortitude]], and [[Temperance (virtue)|temperance]], respectively. In [[classical antiquity]] and [[Christendom]], prudence and fortitude were seen as the [[cardinal virtues]] that should govern society.]]
'''Gentry''' (from [[Old French]] {{lang|fro|genterie}}, from {{lang|fro|gentil}} {{gloss|high-born, noble}}) are "well-born, genteel and well-bred people" of high [[social class]], especially in the past.<ref>{{Cite dictionary |dictionary=Advanced Learner's Dictionary |publisher=Cambridge |entry=Gentry |entry-url=https://dictionary.cambridge.org/dictionary/english/gentry |access-date=2021-12-14 |archive-date=2020-11-12 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20201112013349/https://dictionary.cambridge.org/dictionary/english/gentry |url-status=live }}</ref><ref>{{Cite dictionary |title=English Dictionary |publisher=Oxford |entry=Gentry |entry-url=http://www.askoxford.com:80/concise_oed/gentry?view=ukCompact}}{{dead link|date=July 2021}}</ref> ''Gentry'', in its widest connotation, refers to people of good social position connected to [[Landed property|landed estates]] (see [[manorialism]]), upper levels of the [[clergy]], or "gentle" families of long descent who in some cases never obtained the official right to bear a [[coat of arms]]. The gentry largely consisted of landowners who could live entirely from [[Renting#Rental investment|rental income]] or at least had a [[Estate (land)|country estate]]; some were [[Gentleman farmer|gentleman farmers]]. In the [[United Kingdom]], the term ''gentry'' refers to the [[landed gentry]]: the majority of the land-owning social class who typically had a coat of arms but did not have a [[Peerages in the United Kingdom|peerage]]. The adjective "[[Patrician (post-Roman Europe)|patrician]]" ("of or like a person of high social rank")<ref>{{Cite dictionary |entry=Patrician |entry-url=http://dictionary.cambridge.org/search/british/?q=patrician |dictionary=Dictionary |publisher=Cambridge |access-date=2010-11-05 |archive-date=2010-12-05 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20101205070113/http://dictionary.cambridge.org/search/british/?q=patrician |url-status=live }}</ref> describes in comparison other analogous traditional [[Social stratification|social elite strata]] based in cities, such as the [[City-state|free cities]] of Italy ([[Venice]] and [[Genoa]]) and the [[Free imperial city|free imperial cities]] of Germany, Switzerland, and the [[Hanseatic League]].{{Efn | Following the admired example of the [[Patrician (ancient Rome)|Roman patrician]], the Venetian patrician reverted, especially in the [[Renaissance]], to a life more focused on his rural estate.}}
The term "gentry" by itself, so [[Peter Coss]] argues, is a construct that historians have applied loosely to rather different societies. Any particular model may not fit a specific society, but some scholars prefer a single, unified term.<ref>{{Cite web |title=The Origins of the English Gentry |website=Reviews in History |url=http://www.history.ac.uk/reviews/review/402 |access-date=2019-10-07 |language=en |archive-date=2018-06-27 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20180627173231/http://www.history.ac.uk/reviews/review/402 |url-status=live }}</ref><ref>{{Cite web |title=The Origins of the English Gentry Peter Coss |url=http://assets.cambridge.org/97805210/21005/frontmatter/9780521021005_frontmatter.pdf |access-date=2010-03-09 |archive-date=2011-06-06 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20110606203457/http://assets.cambridge.org/97805210/21005/frontmatter/9780521021005_frontmatter.pdf |url-status=live }}</ref>
== Historical background of social stratification in the West==
[[Image:Three kings or three gods.jpg|thumb|This part of a 12th-century Swedish tapestry has been interpreted to show, from left to right, the one-eyed [[Odin]], the hammer-wielding [[Thor]] and [[Freyr]]. This [[Triad (religion)|triad]] corresponds closely to the trifunctional division: Odin is the patron of priests and magicians, Thor of warriors, and Freyr of fertility and farming.<ref>{{Cite web |last=Leiren|first= Terje I. |year=1999 |title=From Pagan to Christian: The Story in the 12th-Century Tapestry of the Skog Church |url=http://faculty.washington.edu/leiren/vikings2.html |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20041023193136/http://faculty.washington.edu/leiren/vikings2.html |archive-date=2004-10-23 |website=University of Washington}}</ref>]]
The [[Proto-Indo-Europeans|Indo-Europeans]] who settled [[Europe]], [[Central Asia|Central]] and [[West Asia|Western Asia]] and the [[Indian subcontinent]] conceived their societies to be ordered (not divided) in a tripartite fashion, the three parts being castes.<ref>Mallory, J.P. ''In search of the Indo-Europeans'' Thames & Hudson (1991) p. 131</ref> Castes came to be further divided, perhaps as a result of greater specialisation.
The "classic" formulation of the caste system as largely described by [[Georges Dumézil]] was that of a priestly or religiously occupied caste, a warrior caste, and a worker caste. Dumézil divided the [[Proto-Indo-European society|Proto-Indo-Europeans]] into three categories: [[sovereignty]], [[military]], and productivity (see [[Trifunctional hypothesis]]). He further subdivided [[sovereignty]] into two distinct and complementary sub-parts. One part was formal, juridical, and priestly, but rooted in this world. The other was powerful, unpredictable, and also priestly, but rooted in the "other", the supernatural and spiritual world. The second main division was connected with the use of force, the [[military]], and war. Finally, there was a third group, ruled by the other two, whose role was productivity: herding, farming, and [[Craft|crafts]].
This system of caste roles can be seen in the castes which flourished on the Indian subcontinent and amongst the [[Italic peoples]].
Examples of the Indo-European castes:
* '''Indo-Iranian''' – [[Brahmin]]/Athravan, [[Kshatriya|Kshatriyas]]/Rathaestar, [[Vaishya|Vaishyas]]
* '''Celtic''' – [[Druid]]s, [[Equites]], [[Plebeians|Plebes]] (according to [[Julius Caesar]])
* '''Slavic ''' – [[Volkhv|Volkhvs]], Voin, Krestyanin/[[Smerd]]
* '''Anglo-Saxon''' – Gebedmen (prayer-men), [[Fyrd|Fyrdmen]] (army-men), Weorcmen (workmen) (according to [[Alfred the Great]])
* '''Greece (Attica)''' – [[Eupatridae]], [[Geomori (Athens)|Geomori]], [[Republic (Plato)|Demiourgoi]]
* '''Greece (Sparta)''' – [[Spartiate|Homoioi]], [[Perioeci]], [[Helots]]
Kings were born out of the warrior or noble class, and sometimes the priesthood class, like in India.
===Medieval Christendom===
[[File:Organisation féodale.svg|thumb|The [[feudalism|feudal]] social structure in three orders: those who pray (''oratores''), fight (''bellatores'') and work (''laboratores'')]]
[[File:Europe 1000.jpg|thumb|[[Europe]] and the [[Byzantine Empire]] 1000 AD]]
[[Constantine the Great|Emperor Constantine]] [[Convocation|convoked]] the [[First Council of Nicaea]] in 325 whose [[Nicene Creed]] included belief in "one holy catholic and apostolic Church". Emperor [[Theodosius I]] made [[First Council of Nicaea|Nicene]] Christianity the [[Christianity as the Roman state religion|state church of the Roman Empire]] with the [[Edict of Thessalonica]] of 380 that allowed it to happen.<ref>{{Cite book|last=Boyd |first=William Kenneth |year=1905 |title=The Ecclesiastical Edicts of the Theodosian Code |publisher=Columbia University Press}}</ref>
After the fall of the Western Roman Empire in the 5th century, there emerged no single powerful secular government in the West, but there was a central ecclesiastical power in Rome, the Catholic Church. In this power vacuum, the Church rose to become the dominant power in the [[Western Roman Empire|West]] for the start of this time period.
In essence, the earliest vision of [[Christendom]] was a vision of a Christian [[theocracy]], a [[government]] founded upon and upholding [[Christian values]], whose institutions are spread through and over with [[Christian theology|Christian doctrine]]. The [[Catholic Church]]'s peak of authority over all European Christians and their common endeavours of the Christian community—for example, the [[Crusades]], the fight against the [[Moors]] in the [[Iberian Peninsula]] and against the [[Ottoman Empire|Ottomans]] in the [[Balkans]]—helped to develop a sense of communal identity against the obstacle of Europe's deep political divisions.
The classical heritage flourished throughout the Middle Ages in both the [[Byzantine Empire|Byzantine]] [[Greek East and Latin West]]. In [[Plato]]'s ideal state there are three major classes (producers, auxiliaries and guardians), which was representative of the idea of the "[[Phaedrus (dialogue)|tripartite soul]]", which is expressive of three functions or capacities of the human soul: "appetites" (or "passions"), "the spirited element" and "reason" the part that must guide the soul to truth. [[Will Durant]] made the case that certain prominent features of Plato's [[Republic (Plato)|ideal community]] were discernible in the organization, dogma and effectiveness of "the" Medieval Church in Europe:<ref name="Durant">{{Cite book |last=Durant |first=Will |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=suLI7RoaBEEC&pg=PA34 |title=Story of Philosophy |publisher=Simon & Schuster |year=2005 |isbn=978-0-671-69500-2 |access-date=10 December 2013}}</ref>
<blockquote>For a thousand years Europe was ruled by an order of guardians considerably like that which was visioned by our philosopher. During the Middle Ages it was customary to classify the population of Christendom into laboratores (workers), bellatores (soldiers), and oratores (clergy). The last group, though small in number, monopolized the instruments and opportunities of culture, and ruled with almost unlimited sway half of the most powerful continent on the globe. The clergy, like Plato's guardians, were placed in authority ... by their talent as shown in ecclesiastical studies and administration, by their disposition to a life of meditation and simplicity, and ... by the influence of their relatives with the powers of state and church. In the latter half of the period in which they ruled [800 BC onwards], the clergy were as free from family cares as even Plato could desire [for such guardians] ... [Clerical] Celibacy was part of the psychological structure of the power of the clergy; for on the one hand they were unimpeded by the narrowing egoism of the family, and on the other their apparent superiority to the call of the flesh added to the awe in which lay sinners held them. ...<ref name="Durant" /></blockquote>
[[Gaetano Mosca]] wrote on the same subject matter in his book The Ruling Class concerning the Medieval Church and its structure that
Beyond the fact that Clerical celibacy functioned as a spiritual discipline it also was guarantor of the independence of the Church.<ref name="First Things">{{Cite web |date=January 2014 |title=Celibacy as Political Resistance |url=http://www.firstthings.com/article/2014/01/celibacy-as-political-resistance |access-date=7 January 2014 |website=[[First Things]] |archive-date=7 January 2014 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20140107005049/http://www.firstthings.com/article/2014/01/celibacy-as-political-resistance |url-status=live }}</ref>
<blockquote>the Catholic Church has always aspired to a preponderant share in political power, it has never been able to monopolize it entirely, because of two traits, chiefly, that are basic in its structure. Celibacy has generally been required of the clergy and of monks. Therefore no real dynasties of abbots and bishops have ever been able to establish themselves. ... Secondly, in spite of numerous examples to the contrary supplied by the warlike Middle Ages, the ecclesiastical calling has by its very nature never been strictly compatible with the bearing of arms. The precept that exhorts the Church to abhor bloodshed has never dropped completely out of sight, and in relatively tranquil and orderly times it has always been very much to the fore.<ref name="Mosca">{{Cite book |last=Mosca |first=Gaetano |translator=Hannah D Kahn |url=https://archive.org/details/rulingclass031748mbp |title=The Ruling Class |publisher=McGraw Hill |year=1939 |access-date=3 January 2014}}</ref></blockquote>
===Two principal estates of the realm===
The fundamental social structure in Europe in the [[Middle Ages]] was between the [[Hierarchy of the Catholic Church|ecclesiastical hierarchy]], nobles i.e. the tenants in chivalry (counts, barons, knights, esquires, [[franklin (class)|franklins]]) and the ignobles, the [[Serfdom#Villeins|villeins]], citizens, and [[Burgess (title)|burgesses]]. The division of society into classes of nobles and ignobles, in the smaller regions of medieval Europe was inexact. After the [[Reformation|Protestant Reformation]], social intermingling between the noble class and the hereditary clerical upper class became a feature in the monarchies of [[Nordic countries]].
The gentility is primarily formed on the bases of the medieval societies' two higher estates of the realm, [[nobility]] and [[clergy]], both exempted from taxation. Subsequent "gentle" families of long descent who never obtained official rights to bear a coat of arms were also admitted to the rural upper-class society: the gentry.
'''The three estates'''
The widespread three estates order was particularly characteristic of France:
* First estate included the group of all clergy, that is, members of the higher clergy and the lower clergy.
* Second estate has been encapsulated by the nobility. Here too, it did not matter whether they came from a lower or higher nobility or if they were impoverished members.
* Third estate included all nominally free citizens; in some places, free peasants.
At the top of the pyramid were the princes and estates of the king or emperor, or with the clergy, the bishops and the pope.
The feudal system was, for the people of the Middle Ages and early modern period, fitted into a God-given order. The nobility and the third estate were born into their class, and change in social position was slow. Wealth had little influence on what estate one belonged to. The exception was the Medieval Church, which was the only institution where competent men (and women) of merit could reach, in one lifetime, the highest positions in society.
The first estate comprised the entire clergy, traditionally divided into "higher" and "lower" clergy. Although there was no formal demarcation between the two categories, the upper clergy were, effectively, clerical nobility, from the families of the second estate or as in the case of [[Thomas Wolsey|Cardinal Wolsey]], from more humble backgrounds.
The second estate was the nobility. Being wealthy or influential did not automatically make one a noble, and not all nobles were wealthy and influential (aristocratic families have lost their fortunes in various ways, and the concept of the "poor nobleman" is almost as old as nobility itself). Countries without a feudal tradition did not have a nobility as such.
[[File:Mittelalterliches Ständebild 15. Jahrhundert.png|left|thumb|The traditional [[social stratification]] of the [[Western world]] in the 15th century]] The nobility of a person might be either inherited or earned. Nobility in its most general and strict sense is an acknowledged preeminence that is hereditary: legitimate descendants (or all male descendants, in some societies) of nobles are nobles, unless explicitly stripped of the privilege. The terms ''aristocrat'' and ''aristocracy'' are a less formal means to refer to persons belonging to this [[social environment|social milieu]].
Historically in some cultures, members of an upper class often did not have to work for a living, as they were supported by earned or inherited investments (often real estate), although members of the upper class may have had less actual money than merchants. Upper-class status commonly derived from the social position of one's family and not from one's own achievements or wealth. Much of the population that comprised the upper class consisted of aristocrats, ruling families, [[Imperial, royal and noble ranks|titled people]], and religious hierarchs. These people were usually born into their status, and historically, there was not much movement across class boundaries. This is to say that it was much harder for an individual to move up in class simply because of the structure of society.
In many countries, the term ''upper class'' was intimately associated with hereditary land ownership and titles. Political power was often in the hands of the landowners in many pre-industrial societies (which was one of the causes of the French Revolution), despite there being no legal barriers to land ownership for other social classes. Power began to shift from upper-class landed families to the general population in the [[Early modern Europe|early modern age]], leading to marital alliances between the two groups, providing the foundation for the modern upper classes in the West. Upper-class landowners in Europe were often also members of the titled nobility, though not necessarily: the prevalence of titles of nobility varied widely from country to country. Some upper classes were almost entirely untitled, for example, the [[Szlachta]] of the Polish-Lithuanian Commonwealth.
Before the Age of [[Absolutism (European history)|Absolutism]], institutions, such as the church, legislatures, or social elites,<ref>{{Cite web |title=French Absolutism |url=http://www2.sunysuffolk.edu/westn/absolutism.html |access-date=2007-09-29 |website=SUNY Suffolk |archive-date=2010-01-24 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20100124100916/http://www2.sunysuffolk.edu/westn/absolutism.html |url-status=dead }}</ref> restrained monarchical power. Absolutism was characterized by the ending of feudal partitioning, consolidation of power with the monarch, rise of state, rise of professional standing armies, professional bureaucracies, the codification of state laws, and the rise of ideologies that justify the absolutist monarchy. Hence, Absolutism was made possible by innovations and characterized as a phenomenon of [[Early modern Europe|Early Modern Europe]], rather than that of the Middle Ages, where the clergy and nobility counterbalanced as a result of mutual rivalry.
==Gentries==
===Continental Europe===
====Baltic====
{{main|Baltic Germans|Baltic nobility}}
From the middle of the 1860s the privileged position of [[Baltic Germans]] in the Russian Empire began to waver. Already during the reign of [[Nicholas I of Russia|Nicholas I]] (1825–55), who was under pressure from Russian nationalists, some sporadic steps had been taken towards the russification of the provinces. Later, the Baltic Germans faced fierce attacks from the Russian nationalist press, which accused the Baltic aristocracy of separatism, and advocated closer linguistic and administrative integration with Russia.
Social division was based on the dominance of the Baltic Germans which formed the upper classes while the majority of indigenous population, called "Undeutsch", composed the peasantry. In the Imperial census of 1897, 98,573 Germans (7.58% of total population) lived in the [[Governorate of Livonia]], 51,017 (7.57%) in the Governorate of Curonia, and 16,037 (3.89%) in the [[Governorate of Estonia]].<ref>{{Cite periodical |issue=469–470 |date=6–19 June 2011 |script-title=ru:Первая всеобщая перепись населения Российской Империи 1897 г. Распределение населения по родному языку, губерниям и областям |url=http://demoscope.ru/weekly/ssp/rus_lan_97.php?reg=49 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20110629071138/http://demoscope.ru/weekly/ssp/rus_lan_97.php?reg=49 |archive-date=2011-06-29 |periodical=Demoscope |language=ru}}.</ref> The social changes faced by the emancipation, both social and national, of the Estonians and Latvians were not taken seriously by the Baltic German gentry. The provisional government of Russia after 1917 revolution gave the Estonians and Latvians [[self-governance]] which meant the end of the Baltic German era in Baltics.
The Lithuanian gentry consisted mainly of [[Lithuanians]], but due to strong ties to Poland, had been culturally Polonized. After the [[Union of Lublin]] in 1569, they became less distinguishable from Polish ''[[szlachta]]'', although preserved [[Lithuania]]n national awareness.
====Kingdom of Hungary====
In [[Lands of the Crown of Saint Stephen|Hungary]] during the late 19th and early 20th century gentry (sometimes spelled as ''dzsentri'') were nobility without land who often sought employment as civil servants, army officers, or went into politics.<ref>{{Cite web |last=Harmat |first=Árpád Péter |date=12 February 2015 |title=Magyarország társadalma a dualizmus korában |url=http://tortenelemcikkek.hu/node/242 |access-date=8 May 2019 |language=hu |archive-date=8 May 2019 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20190508110455/http://tortenelemcikkek.hu/node/242 |url-status=live }}</ref>
====Polish–Lithuanian Commonwealth====
{{Further|Polish landed gentry}}
In the history of the [[Polish–Lithuanian Commonwealth]], "gentry" is often used in English to describe the [[Polish landed gentry]] ({{langx|pl|ziemiaństwo, ziemianie}}, from ''[[ziemia]]'', "land").  They were the lesser members of the nobility (the ''[[szlachta]]''), contrasting with the much smaller but more powerful group of "magnate" families (sing. ''magnat'', plural ''magnaci'' in Polish), the [[Magnates of Poland and Lithuania]]. Compared to the situation in England and some other parts of Europe, these two parts of the overall "nobility" to a large extent operated as different classes, and were often in conflict. After the [[Partitions of Poland]], at least in the stereotypes of 19th-century nationalist lore, the magnates often made themselves at home in the capitals and courts of the partitioning powers, while the gentry remained on their estates, keeping the national culture alive.
From the 15th century, only the ''szlachta'', and a few patrician bughers from some cities, were allowed to own rural estates of any size, as part of the very extensive [[Nobility privileges in Poland|szlachta privileges]]. These restrictions were reduced or removed after the Partitions of Poland, and commoner landowners began to emerge. By the 19th century, there were at least 60,000 ''szlachta'' families, most rather poor, and many no longer owning land.<ref>{{Cite book |last=Ross |first=M. |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=fqxDAAAAYAAJ |title=A History of Poland from its Foundation as a State to the Present Time |publisher=Pattison and Ross |year=1835 |location=Newcastle upon Tyne |page=51 |chapter=A Descriptive View of Poland: Character, Manners, and Customs of the Poles |quote=''At least 60,000 families belong to this class [nobility], of which, however, only about 100 are wealthy; all the rest are poor.''}}</ref>  By then the "gentry" included many non-noble landowners.
====Spain and Portugal====
In [[Spanish nobility]] and former Portuguese nobility, see [[Hidalgo (nobility)|hidalgos]] and [[Spanish nobility#Lower nobility|infanzones]].
====Swedish====
In Sweden, there was no outright [[serfdom]]. Hence, the gentry was a class of well-off citizens that had grown from the wealthier or more powerful members of the peasantry. The two historically legally privileged [[Social class|classes]] in Sweden were the Swedish nobility ''([[Swedish nobility|Adeln]])'', a rather small group numerically, and the [[clergy]], which were part of the so-called ''[[Swedish nobility#Medieval nobility: Frälse|frälse]]'' (a classification defined by tax exemptions and representation in the [[Diet (assembly)|diet]]).
At the head of the Swedish clergy stood the Archbishop of Uppsala since 1164. The clergy encompassed almost all the educated men of the day and furthermore was strengthened by considerable wealth, and thus it came naturally to play a significant political role. Until the Reformation, the clergy was the first estate but was relegated to the secular estate in the Protestant North Europe.
In the Middle Ages, celibacy in the [[Catholic Church]] had been a natural barrier to the formation of an hereditary priestly class. After compulsory celibacy was abolished in Sweden during the [[Protestant Reformation|Reformation]], the formation of a hereditary priestly class became possible, whereby wealth and clerical positions were frequently inheritable. Hence the bishops and the vicars, who formed the clerical upper class, would frequently have [[Manorialism|manors]] similar to those of other country gentry. Hence continued the medieval Church legacy of the intermingling between noble class and clerical upper class and the intermarriage as the distinctive element in several Nordic countries after the Reformation.
[[Swedish name#Surnames amongst the Swedish gentry|Surnames in Sweden]] can be traced to the 15th century, when they were first used by the Gentry (Frälse), i.e., priests and nobles. The names of these were usually in Swedish, Latin, German or Greek.
The adoption of Latin names was first used by the Catholic clergy in the 15th century. The given name was preceded by Herr (Sir), such as Herr Lars, Herr Olof, Herr Hans, followed by a Latinized form of [[patronymic]] names, e.g., Lars Petersson Latinized as Laurentius Petri. Starting from the time of the Reformation, the Latinized form of their birthplace ([[Laurentius Petri Gothus]], from Östergötland) became a common naming practice for the clergy.
In the 17th and 18th centuries, the surname was only rarely the original family name of the ennobled; usually, a more imposing new name was chosen. This was a period which produced a myriad of two-word Swedish-language family names for the nobility (very favored prefixes were Adler, "eagle"; Ehren – "ära", "honor"; Silfver, "silver"; and Gyllen, "golden"). The regular difference with Britain was that it became the new surname of the whole house, and the old surname was dropped altogether.
====Ukraine====
The [[Eastern Catholic clergy in Ukraine|Western Ukrainian Clergy]] of the [[Ukrainian Greek Catholic Church]] were a hereditary tight-knit social caste that dominated western Ukrainian society from the late eighteenth until the mid-20th centuries, following the reforms instituted by [[Joseph II, Holy Roman Emperor|Joseph II, Emperor of Austria]]. Because, like their [[Eastern Orthodox Church|Eastern Orthodox]] brethren, Ukrainian Catholic priests could marry, they were able to establish "priestly dynasties", often associated with specific regions, for many generations. Numbering approximately 2,000–2,500 by the 19th century, priestly families tended to marry within their group, constituting a tight-knit hereditary caste.<ref name="Subtleny">{{Cite book |last=Subtelny |first=Orest |title=Ukraine: A History |publisher=University of Toronto Press |year=1988 |location=Toronto |pages=214–19}}.</ref> In the absence of a significant native nobility and enjoying a virtual monopoly on education and wealth within western Ukrainian society, the clergy came to form that group's native aristocracy. The clergy adopted Austria's role for them as bringers of culture and education to the Ukrainian countryside. Most Ukrainian social and political movements in Austrian-controlled territory emerged or were highly influenced by the clergy themselves or by their children.  This influence was so great that western Ukrainians were accused of wanting to create a theocracy in western Ukraine by their Polish rivals.<ref>{{Cite book |last=Himka |first=John Paul |title=Religion and Nationality in Western Ukraine |publisher=McGill-Queen's University Press |year=1999 |location=Montreal and Kingston |page=10}}.</ref> The central role played by the Ukrainian clergy or their children in western Ukrainian society would weaken somewhat at the end of the 19th century but would continue until the mid-20th century.
===United States===
{{Main|American gentry}}
{{expand section|date=November 2021}}
The '''American gentry''' were rich landowning members of the [[American upper class]] in the colonial South.
[[File:Washington 1787-1790.jpg|100px|thumb|left|[[George Washington]]]]
[[Image:Thomas Jefferson's Monticello.JPG|thumb|alt=A photo of the house Monticello|[[Thomas Jefferson]]'s home, [[Monticello]], in Virginia, was the seat of his [[Plantation complexes in the Southern United States|plantation.]]]]
The [[Thirteen Colonies|Colonial American]] use of ''gentry'' was not common. Historians use it to refer to rich landowners in the South before 1776. Typically large scale landowners rented out farms to white tenant farmers. North of Maryland, there were few large comparable rural estates, except in the Dutch domains in the [[Hudson Valley]] of New York.<ref>See François-Joseph Ruggiu, "Extraction, wealth and industry: The ideas of noblesse and of gentility in the English and French Atlantics (17th–18th centuries)." ''History of European Ideas'' 34.4 (2008): 444-455 [https://www.academia.edu/download/47907810/j.histeuroideas.2008.08.00720160809-30978-8bkq8i.pdf online]{{dead link|date=July 2022|bot=medic}}{{cbignore|bot=medic}}</ref><ref>Arthur M. Schlesinger,  “The Aristocracy in Colonial America.” ''Proceedings of the Massachusetts Historical Society,'' vol. 74, 1962, pp. 3–21. [https://www.jstor.org/stable/25080556 online] {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20211123144428/https://www.jstor.org/stable/25080556 |date=2021-11-23 }}</ref>
===Great Britain===
{{Further|Landed gentry|Storm over the gentry|Social class in the United Kingdom}}
The British upper classes consist of two sometimes overlapping entities, the [[peerage]] and [[landed gentry]]. In the British peerage, only the senior family member (typically the eldest son) inherits a substantive title (duke, marquess, earl, viscount, baron); these are referred to as peers or lords. The rest of the nobility form part of the "landed gentry" (abbreviated "gentry"). The members of the gentry usually bear no titles but can be described as esquire or gentleman. Exceptions are the eldest sons of peers, who bear their fathers' inferior titles as "courtesy titles" (but for Parliamentary purposes count as commoners), [[Barons in Scotland|Scottish barons]] (who bear the designation Baron of X after their name)<ref>{{Cite web |title=The Court of the Lord Lyon |url=http://www.lyon-court.com/lordlyon/536.html |access-date=2010-06-22 |archive-date=2017-10-09 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20171009110504/http://www.lyon-court.com/lordlyon/536.html |url-status=dead }}</ref> and [[Baronet|baronets]] (a title corresponding to a hereditary knighthood). [[Laird|Scottish lairds]] do not have a title of nobility but may have a description of their lands in the form of a [[territorial designation]] that forms part of their name.<ref>{{Cite web |website=Debrett's |department=Forms of Address |url=http://www.debretts.com/forms-of-address/titles/scottish--and-irish-titles/chief,-chieftain,-laird.aspx |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20100801214511/http://www.debretts.com/forms-of-address/titles/scottish--and-irish-titles/chief,-chieftain,-laird.aspx |archive-date=2010-08-01 |access-date=2010-07-18 |title=Chief, Chieftain or Laird}}</ref>
[[File:Buckingham Palace ILN 1842.jpg|thumb|Buckingham Palace]]
The landed gentry is a traditional British [[social class]] consisting of [[Gentleman|gentlemen]] in the original sense; that is, those who owned land in the form of [[Estate (land)|country estates]] to such an extent that they were not required to actively work, except in an administrative capacity on their own lands. The estates were often (but not always) made up of [[Tenant farmer|tenanted farms]], in which case the gentleman could live entirely off [[renting|rent]] income. Gentlemen, ranking below esquires and above yeomen, form the lowest rank of British nobility. It is the lowest rank to which the descendants of a Knight, Baronet or Peer can sink. Strictly speaking, anybody with officially matriculated English or Scottish arms is a gentleman and thus noble.
The term ''landed gentry'', although originally used to mean nobility, came to be used for the lesser nobility in England around 1540.  Once identical, these terms eventually became complementary. The term ''gentry'' by itself, as commonly used by historians, according to [[Peter Coss]], is a construct applied loosely to rather different societies. Any particular model may not fit a specific society, yet a single definition nevertheless remains desirable.<ref>{{Cite web |last=Hicks |first=Michael |title=The Origins of the English Gentry |url=http://www.history.ac.uk/reviews/review/402 |type=review |issue=402 |place=UK |access-date=2010-03-09 |archive-date=2018-06-27 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20180627173231/http://www.history.ac.uk/reviews/review/402 |url-status=live }}.</ref><ref>{{Cite book |last=Coss |first=Peter |date=13 October 2005 |title=The Origins of the English Gentry |url=http://assets.cambridge.org/97805210/21005/frontmatter/9780521021005_frontmatter.pdf |publisher=Cambridge University Press |isbn=0-52102100-6 |access-date=9 March 2010 |archive-date=6 June 2011 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20110606203457/http://assets.cambridge.org/97805210/21005/frontmatter/9780521021005_frontmatter.pdf |url-status=live }}.</ref> Titles, while often considered central to the upper class, are not strictly so. Both Captain [[Mark Phillips]] and Vice Admiral Sir [[Timothy Laurence]], the respective first and second husbands of [[Forms of address in the United Kingdom|HRH]] [[Anne, Princess Royal|Princess Anne]], lacked any rank of peerage at the time of their marriage to Princess Anne. However, the  backgrounds of both men were considered to be essentially patrician, and they were thus deemed{{by whom|date=April 2017}} suitable husbands for a princess.
[[Esquire]] (abbreviated Esq.) is a term derived from the Old French word "escuier" (which also gave equerry) and is in the United Kingdom the second-lowest designation for a nobleman, referring only to males, and used to denote a high but indeterminate social status. The most common occurrence of term ''Esquire'' today is the conferral as the suffix ''Esq.'' in order to pay an informal compliment to a male recipient by way of implying [[Nobility|gentle birth]]. In the post-medieval world, the title of ''esquire'' came to apply to all men of the higher landed gentry; an esquire ranked socially above a gentleman but below a knight. In the modern world, where all men are assumed to be gentlemen, the term has often been extended (albeit only in very formal writing) to all men without any higher title. It is used post-nominally, usually in abbreviated form (for example, "Thomas Smith, Esq.").
A [[knight]] could refer to either a medieval tenant who gave military service as a mounted man-at-arms to a feudal landholder, or a medieval gentleman-soldier, usually high-born, raised by a sovereign to privileged military status after training as a page and squire (for a contemporary reference, see [[Orders, decorations, and medals of the United Kingdom|British honours system]]). In formal protocol, ''[[Sir]]'' is the correct [[Style (form of address)|styling]] for a knight or for a baronet, used with (one of) the knight's [[given name]](s) or full name, but not with the [[surname]] alone. The equivalent for a woman who holds the title in her own right is [[Dame]]; for such women, the title ''Dame'' is used as ''Sir'' for a man, never before the surname on its own. This usage was devised{{by whom|date=April 2017}} in 1917, derived from the practice, up to the 17th century (and still also in legal proceedings), for the wife of a knight.  The wife of a knight or baronet is now styled "[[Lady]] [husband's surname]".
====Historiography====
The "[[Storm over the gentry]]" was a major historiographical debate among scholars that took place in the 1940s and 1950s regarding the role of the gentry in causing the [[English Civil War]] of the 17th century.<ref>{{Cite book |first1=Ronald H. |last1=Fritze |first2=William B. |last2=Robison |url=https://archive.org/details/historicaldictio00frit |title=Historical Dictionary of Stuart England, 1603-1689 |publisher=Greenwood |year=1996 |isbn=9780313283918 |pages=[https://archive.org/details/historicaldictio00frit/page/205 205]–7 |url-access=registration}}</ref> [[R. H. Tawney]] had suggested in 1941 that there was a major economic crisis for the nobility in the 16th and 17th centuries, and that the rapidly rising gentry class was demanding a share of power. When the aristocracy resisted, Tawney argued, the gentry launched the civil war.<ref>R. H. Tawney, "The Rise of the Gentry, 1558-1640," ''Economic History Review'' (1941) 11#1 pp. 1–38 {{JSTOR|2590708}}</ref> After heated debate, historians generally concluded that the role of the gentry was not especially important.<ref>J.H. Hexter, 'Storm over the Gentry', in Hexter, ''Reappraisals in History'' (1961) pp. 117–62</ref>
===Irish===
[[File:Neale(1825) p2.244 - Carton House, Kildare.jpg|thumb|'''Carton House castle of Fitzgeralds''']]
{{main|Irish nobility}}The Irish gentry, often referred to as the Anglo-Irish Ascendancy, emerged as a dominant landowning class during British rule in Ireland. Comprising Protestant elites, they held significant political and social influence while overseeing vast estates. The Irish gentry also played a key role in shaping cultural and literary traditions, as seen with families like the [[FitzGerald dynasty|Fitzgeralds]] and [[Butler dynasty|Butlers]]. However, their prominence waned after [[Irish War of Independence|Irish independence]] and [[Land reform in Ireland|land reforms]].{{further|Protestant Ascendancy}}
===East Asia===
====China====
{{Main|Landed gentry in China}}The 'four divisions of society' refers to the [[Four occupations|model of society in ancient China]] and was a [[Meritocracy|meritocratic]] [[social class]] system in China and other subsequently influenced [[Confucianism|Confucian]] societies. The four castes—gentry, farmers, artisans and merchants—are combined to form the term Shìnónggōngshāng (士農工商).
[[File:First Entrance Gate of the Temple of Confucius, Ching-hai.jpg|thumb|'''First Entrance Gate of the Temple of Confucius Ching-hai''']]
Gentry (士) means different things in different countries. In China, Korea, and Vietnam, this meant that the Confucian scholar gentry that would – for the most part – make up most of the bureaucracy. This caste would comprise both the more-or-less hereditary aristocracy as well as the meritocratic scholars that rise through the rank by public service and, later, by imperial exams. Some sources, such as [[Xunzi (philosopher)|Xunzi]], list farmers before the gentry, based on the Confucian view that they directly contributed to the welfare of the state. In China, the farmer lifestyle is also closely linked with the ideals of Confucian gentlemen.
In Japan, this caste essentially equates to the samurai class.{{Also|Four occupations (East Asia)|Social structure of China}}
====Hierarchical structure of Feudal Japan====
{{Main|Edo society|Kazoku}}
[[File:Matsue daimyo c1850s.jpg|thumb|upright|Matsue ''[[daimyō]]'' (c. 1850s)]]
There were two leading classes, i.e. the gentry, in the time of feudal Japan: the ''[[Daimyo|daimyō]]'' and the ''[[samurai]]''. The Confucian ideals in the Japanese culture emphasised the importance of productive members of society, so farmers and fishermen were considered of a higher status than merchants.
In the [[Edo period]], with the creation of the [[Han (country subdivision)|Domains (''han'')]] under the rule of [[Tokugawa Ieyasu]], all land was confiscated and reissued as fiefdoms to the ''[[Daimyo|daimyōs]]''.
The small lords, the {{nihongo|samurai|武士|bushi}}, were ordered either to give up their swords and rights and remain on their lands as peasants or to move to the castle cities to become paid retainers of the ''daimyōs''. Only a few samurai were allowed to remain in the countryside; the {{Nihongo |landed samurai|郷士|gōshi}}. Some 5 per cent of the population were samurai. Only the samurai could have proper surnames, something that after the [[Meiji Restoration]] became compulsory to all inhabitants (see [[Japanese name]]).
[[Emperor Meiji]] abolished the samurai's right to be the only armed force in favor of a more modern, Western-style, conscripted army in 1873. Samurai became ''[[Shizoku]]'' ({{lang|ja|士族}}), but the right to wear a katana in public was eventually abolished along with the right to [[Capital punishment|execute]] commoners who paid them disrespect.
In defining how a modern Japan should be, members of the Meiji government decided to follow in the footsteps of the United Kingdom and Germany, basing the country on the concept of ''[[noblesse oblige]]''. Samurai were not to be a political force under the new order. The difference between the Japanese and European feudal systems was that European feudalism was grounded in [[Roman law|Roman legal structure]] while Japan feudalism had Chinese [[Confucianism|Confucian morality]] as its basis.<ref>{{Cite web |last=Snyder |first=MR |date=October 1994 |title=Japanese vs. European Feudalism |url=http://www.psych.ualberta.ca/~msnyder/Academic/japvseur.html |website=Alberta Vocational College |access-date=2010-03-09 |archive-date=2008-12-10 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20081210183422/http://www.psych.ualberta.ca/~msnyder/Academic/japvseur.html |url-status=live }}.</ref>[[File:Sainshieum.jpg|thumb|upright|Group of ''[[Seonbi]]'' (virtuous scholars) in Korea that followed confucian precepts, c. 18th century painting]]
====Korea====
{{main|Yangban}}
Korean monarchy and the native ruling upper class existed in [[Korea]] until the end of the [[Korea under Japanese rule|Japanese occupation]]. The system concerning the nobility is roughly the same as that of the [[Chinese nobility]].
As the monastical orders did during Europe's [[Dark Ages (historiography)|Dark Ages]], the Buddhist monks became the purveyors and guardians of Korea's literary traditions while documenting Korea's written history and legacies from the [[Silla]] period to the end of the [[Goryeo]] dynasty. Korean Buddhist monks also developed and used the first movable metal type printing presses in history—some 500 years before [[Johannes Gutenberg|Gutenberg]]—to print ancient Buddhist texts. Buddhist monks also engaged in record keeping, food storage and distribution, as well as the ability to exercise power by influencing the Goryeo royal court.
==== Ottoman middle east ====
{{Main article|Rural notables (Palestine)|Ayan (class)}}
[[File:Opening ceremony of the First Ottoman Parliament at the Dolmabahce Palace in 1876.jpg|thumb|Opening ceremony of the First Ottoman Parliament at the Dolmabahce Palace in 1876]]
In the [[Ottoman Empire|Ottoman]] [[Middle East|middle east]], the gentry consisted of [[Ayan (class)|notables]], or [[Ayan (class)|a'yan]].<ref>{{Citation |last=Batatu |first=Hanna |title=Syria's Peasantry, the Descendants of Its Lesser Rural Notables, and Their Politics |date=2012-09-17 |work=Syria's Peasantry, the Descendants of Its Lesser Rural Notables, and Their Politics |url=https://www.degruyter.com/document/doi/10.1515/9781400845842/html |access-date=2024-05-03 |publisher=Princeton University Press |language=en |doi=10.1515/9781400845842/html |isbn=978-1-4008-4584-2}}</ref> The a'yan consisted of two groups: urban and rural gentries. Urban elites were traditionally made of city-dwelling [[Merchant|merchants]] (''tujjar''),<ref>{{Cite book |last=Gilbar |first=Gad |url=https://www.taylorfrancis.com/books/mono/10.4324/9781003177425/trade-enterprise-gad-gilbar |title=Trade and Enterprise: The Muslim Tujjar in the Ottoman Empire and Qajar Iran, 1860-1914 |date=2022-10-31 |publisher=Routledge |isbn=978-1-003-17742-5 |location=London |doi=10.4324/9781003177425/trade-enterprise-gad-gilbar}}</ref> clerics ('''[[Ulama|ulema]]''), [[Sharif|ashraf]], [[Soldier|military officers]], and governmental [[Official|functionaries]].<ref>{{Cite journal |last=Gelvin |first=James L. |date=2006 |title=The "Politics of Notables" Forty Years After |url=https://www.jstor.org/stable/23062629 |journal=Middle East Studies Association Bulletin |volume=40 |issue=1 |pages=19–29 |issn=0026-3184}}</ref><ref>{{Cite journal |last=Cleveland |first=William L. |date=1989 |editor-last=Muslih |editor-first=Muhammad Y. |title=Politics of the Notables |url=https://www.jstor.org/stable/2537348 |journal=Journal of Palestine Studies |volume=18 |issue=3 |pages=142–144 |doi=10.2307/2537348 |issn=0377-919X}}</ref><ref>{{Cite journal |last=Toledano |first=Ehud R. |title=Ehud R. Toledano, “The Emergence of Ottoman-Local Elites (1700-1800): A Framework for Research,” in I. Pappé and M. Ma’oz (eds.), Middle Eastern Politics and Ideas: A History from within, London and New York: Tauris Academic Studies, 1997, 145-162 |url=https://www.academia.edu/4899678/Ehud_R_Toledano_The_Emergence_of_Ottoman_Local_Elites_1700_1800_A_Framework_for_Research_in_I_Papp%C3%A9_and_M_Ma_oz_eds_Middle_Eastern_Politics_and_Ideas_A_History_from_within_London_and_New_York_Tauris_Academic_Studies_1997_145_162}}</ref> The rural notability's ranks included rural [[Sheikh|sheikhs]] and village or clan [[Mukhtar|mukhtars]]. Most notables originated in, and belonged to, the [[Fellah|fellahin]] (peasantry) class, forming a lower-echelon [[Land ownership|land-owning]] gentry in the Empire's post-[[Tanzimat]] countryside and emergent towns.<ref>{{Cite web |title=Landed Property and Elite Conflict in Ottoman Tulkarm |url=https://www.palestine-studies.org/en/node/78442 |access-date=2024-05-03 |website=Institute for Palestine Studies |language=en}}</ref> In Palestine, rural notables form the majority of Palestinian [[Elite|elites]], although certainly not the richest.<ref name=":0">{{Cite journal |last=Marom |first=Roy |author-link=Roy Marom |date=April 2024 |title=The Palestinian Rural Notables’ Class in Ascendency: The Hannun Family of Tulkarm (Palestine) |url=https://www.academia.edu/118470248/THE_PALESTINIAN_RURAL_NOTABLES_CLASS_IN_ASCENDENCY_THE_HANNUN_FAMILY_OF_TULKARM_PALESTINE_1 |journal=[[Journal of Holy Land and Palestine Studies]] |language=en |volume=23 |issue=1 |pages=77–108 |doi=10.3366/hlps.2024.0327 |issn=2054-1988 |via=Academia|doi-access=free }}</ref> Rural notables took advantage of changing legal, administrative and political conditions, and [[Globalization|global economic realities]], to achieve ascendancy using [[Household|households]], [[Marriage of state|marriage alliances]] and [[Patronage|networks of patronage]].<ref name=":0" /> Over all, they played a leading role in the development of modern Palestine and other countries well into the late 20th century.<ref>{{Cite web |title=The Dynamics of Palestinian Elite Formation |url=https://www.palestine-studies.org/en/node/40116 |access-date=2024-05-03 |website=Institute for Palestine Studies |language=en}}</ref>
==Values and traditions==
===Military and clerical===
{{main|Military elite}}
[[File:Hungarian knights, Illustration for Il costume antico e moderno by Giulio Ferrario 1831 (4).jpg|thumb|[[Kingdom of Hungary|Hungarian]] nobles, circa 1831]]
Historically, the nobles in Europe became soldiers; the aristocracy in Europe can trace their origins to military leaders from the [[Migration Period|migration period]] and the Middle Ages. For many years, the British Army, together with the Church, was seen as the ideal career for the younger sons of the aristocracy. Although now much diminished, the practice has not totally disappeared. Such practices are not unique to the British either geographically or historically. As a very practical form of displaying patriotism, it has been at times fashionable for "gentlemen" to participate in the military.
The fundamental idea of gentry had come to be that of the essential superiority of the fighting man, usually maintained in the granting of arms.<ref>{{Cite book |last=Selden |first=John |title=Titles of Honour |year=1614 |page=707}}</ref> At the last, the wearing of a sword on all occasions was the outward and visible sign of a "gentleman"; the custom survives in the sword worn with "court dress". A suggestion that a gentleman must have a coat of arms was vigorously advanced by certain 19th- and 20th-century heraldists, notably [[Arthur Charles Fox-Davies]] in England and [[Thomas Innes of Learney]] in Scotland. The significance of a right to a coat of arms was that it was definitive proof of the status of gentleman, but it recognised rather than conferred such a status, and the status could be and frequently was accepted without a right to a coat of arms.
===Chivalry===
[[File:Meister der Manessischen Liederhandschrift 001.jpg|upright|thumb|A knight being armed.]]
{{Main|Chivalry}}
''Chivalry''{{Refn|group = "lower-alpha" |Etymology: English from 1292, loans from French ''chevalerie'' "[[knighthood]]", from ''chevalier'' "knight" from [[Medieval Latin]] ''caballarius'' "horseman"; ''[[cavalry]]'' is from the [[Middle French]] form of the same word.}} is a term related to the medieval institution of [[Knight|knighthood]]. It is usually associated with ideals of [[Chivalry|knightly virtues]], [[honour]] and [[courtly love]].
Christianity had a modifying influence on the virtues of chivalry, with limits placed on knights to protect and honour the weaker members of society and maintain peace. The church became more tolerant of war in the defence of faith, espousing theories of the [[Just war theory|just war]]. In the 11th century, the concept of a "knight of Christ" (''miles Christi'') gained currency in France, Spain and Italy.<ref name="sweeney">{{Cite book |last=Sweeney |first=James Ross |title=[[The Dictionary of the Middle Ages]] |year=1983 |volume=III |chapter=Chivalry |author-link=James Ross Sweeney}}.</ref> These concepts of "religious chivalry" were further elaborated in the era of the [[Crusades]].<ref name=sweeney/>
In the later Middle Ages, wealthy merchants strove to adopt chivalric attitudes.<ref name=sweeney/> This was a democratisation of chivalry, leading to a new genre called the [[courtesy book]], which were guides to the behaviour of "gentlemen".<ref name=sweeney/>
When examining [[medieval literature]], chivalry can be classified into three basic but overlapping areas:
# Duties to countrymen and fellow Christians
# Duties to God
# Duties to women
These three areas obviously overlap quite frequently in chivalry and are often indistinguishable. Another classification of chivalry divides it into warrior, religious and courtly love strands. One particular similarity between all three of these categories is honour. Honour is the foundational and guiding principle of chivalry. Thus, for the knight, honour would be one of the guides of action.
===Gentleman===
[[File:The English Gentleman Richard Brathwait by Robert Vaughan 1630.jpg|upright|thumb|A page from Brathwait's book that displays the qualities associated with being a gentleman]]
{{Main|Gentleman}}
The term gentleman (from Latin ''gentilis'', belonging to a race or ''gens'', and  "man", [[cognate]] with the French word ''gentilhomme'', the Spanish ''gentilhombre'' and the Italian ''gentil uomo'' or ''gentiluomo''), in its original and strict signification, denoted a man of good family, analogous to the Latin ''generosus'' (its invariable translation in English-Latin documents). In this sense the word equates with the French ''gentilhomme'' ("nobleman"), which was in Great Britain long confined to the peerage. The term ''gentry'' (from the Old French ''genterise'' for ''gentelise'') has much of the social-class significance of the French ''noblesse'' or of the German ''Adel'', but without the strict technical requirements of those traditions (such as [[quarters of nobility]]). To a degree, ''gentleman'' signified a man with an income derived from [[landed property]], a [[old money|legacy]] or some other source and was thus independently wealthy and did not need to work.
===Confucianism===
The [[East Asia|Far East]] also held similar ideas to the West of what a gentleman is, which are based on [[Confucianism|Confucian]] principles. The term ''[[Junzi|Jūnzǐ]]'' (君子) is a term crucial to classical Confucianism. Literally meaning "son of a ruler", "prince" or "noble", the ideal of a "gentleman", "proper man", "exemplary person", or "perfect man" is that for which Confucianism exhorts all people to strive. A succinct description of the "perfect man" is one who "combine[s] the qualities of saint, scholar, and gentleman" ([[Catholic Encyclopedia|CE]]). A hereditary elitism was bound up with the concept, and gentlemen were expected to act as moral guides to the rest of society. They were to:
* cultivate themselves morally;
* participate in the correct performance of ritual;
* show filial piety and loyalty where these are due; and
* cultivate humaneness.
The opposite of the ''Jūnzǐ'' was the ''Xiǎorén'' (小人), literally "small person" or "petty person". Like English "small", the word in this context in Chinese can mean petty in mind and heart, narrowly self-interested, greedy, superficial, and materialistic.
===Noblesse oblige===
{{main|Noblesse oblige}}
The idea of ''noblesse oblige'', "nobility obliges", among gentry is, as the ''[[Oxford English Dictionary]]'' expresses, that the term "suggests noble ancestry constrains to honorable behaviour; privilege entails to responsibility". Being a noble meant that one had responsibilities to lead, manage and so on. One was not to simply spend one's time in idle pursuits.
==Heraldry==
{{Main|Coat of arms}}
[[File:Robert Glover Pedigree de Euro.jpg|thumb|An example of an [[Elizabethan era|Elizabethan]] pedigree of the de Euro family of [[Northumberland]], barons of Warkworth and Clavering. Scrivened, circa 1570 to 1588]]
A coat of arms is a heraldic device dating to the 12th century in Europe. It was originally a cloth tunic worn over or in place of armour to establish identity in battle.<ref>{{Cite encyclopedia |encyclopedia=Encyclopædia Britannica |entry-url=https://www.britannica.com/EBchecked/topic/35518/coat-of-arms |edition=online |entry=Coat of arms |access-date=2022-06-21 |archive-date=2015-05-03 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20150503000347/http://www.britannica.com/EBchecked/topic/35518/coat-of-arms |url-status=live }}.</ref> The coat of arms is drawn with heraldic rules for a person, family or organisation. Family coats of arms were originally derived from personal ones, which then became extended in time to the whole family. In Scotland, family coats of arms are still personal ones and are mainly used by the head of the family. In heraldry, a person entitled to a coat of arms is an [[armiger]], and their family would be armigerous.{{fact|date=March 2022}}
===Ecclesiastical heraldry===
{{Main|Ecclesiastical heraldry}}
Ecclesiastical heraldry is the tradition of heraldry developed by Christian clergy. Initially used to mark documents, ecclesiastical heraldry evolved as a system for identifying people and [[diocese]]s. It is most formalised within the Catholic Church, where most [[bishop]]s, including the [[pope]], have a personal [[coat of arms]]. Clergy in [[Anglicanism|Anglican]], [[Lutheranism|Lutheran]], [[Eastern Catholic Churches|Eastern Catholic]], and [[Eastern Christianity|Orthodox churches]] follow similar customs.
==See also==
* [[American gentry]]
* [[Aristocracy]]
* [[Cabang Atas]]
* [[Gentlewoman]]
* [[Grand Burgher]]
* [[Habitus (sociology)|Habitus]]
* [[Hanseaten (class)]]
* [[Landed gentry]]
* [[Nobility]]
* [[Patrician (ancient Rome)]]
* [[Gentleman farmer]]
* [[Principalía]]
* [[Priyayi]]
* ''[[Redorer son blason]]''
* [[Bildungsbürgertum]]
* [[Social environment]]
* [[Symbolic capital]]
* [[Szlachta]]
* [[Yeoman]]
==Notes==
{{Reflist| group="lower-alpha" |colwidth=64 em}}
==References==
{{Reflist|colwidth=30em}}
==Further reading==
{{Further|Landed gentry#Further reading}}
===Great Britain===
* Acheson, Eric. ''A gentry community: Leicestershire in the fifteenth century, c. 1422–c. 1485'' (Cambridge University Press, 2003).
* Butler, Joan. ''Landed Gentry'' (1954)
* Coss, Peter R. ''The origins of the English gentry'' (2005) [https://archive.org/details/originsofenglish0000coss online]
* Heal, Felicity. ''The gentry in England and Wales, 1500–1700'' (1994) [https://archive.org/details/gentryinenglandw0000heal online].
* Mingay, Gordon E. ''The Gentry: The Rise and Fall of a Ruling Class'' (1976) [https://archive.org/details/gentryrisefallof0000ming online]
* O'Hart, John. ''The Irish And Anglo-Irish Landed Gentry, When Cromwell Came to Ireland: or, a Supplement to Irish Pedigrees'' (2 vols) (reprinted 2007)
* Sayer, M. J. ''English Nobility: The Gentry, the Heralds and the Continental Context'' (Norwich, 1979)
* Wallis, Patrick, and Cliff Webb. "The education and training of gentry sons in early modern England." ''Social History'' 36.1 (2011): 36–53. [http://eprints.lse.ac.uk/27958/1/WP128.pdf online]
===Europe===
* Eatwell, Roger, ed. ''European political cultures'' (Routledge, 2002).
* Jones, Michael ed. ''Gentry and Lesser Nobility in Late Medieval Europe'' (1986) [https://archive.org/details/gentrylessernobi00jone online].
* Lieven, Dominic C.B. ''The aristocracy in Europe, 1815–1914'' (Macmillan, 1992).
* Wallerstein, Immanuel. ''The modern world-system I: Capitalist agriculture and the origins of the European world-economy in the sixteenth century. Vol. 1'' (Univ of California Press, 2011).
* Wasson, Ellis. ''Aristocracy and the modern world'' (Macmillan International Higher Education, 2006), for 19th and 20th centuries
===Historiography===
{{Further|Storm over the gentry}}
* Hexter, Jack H. ''Reappraisals in history: New views on history and society in early modern Europe'' (1961), emphasis on England.
* MacDonald, William W. "English Historians Repeating Themselves: The Refining of the Whig Interpretation of the English Revolution and Civil War." ''Journal of Thought'' (1972): 166–175. [https://www.jstor.org/stable/42590056 online]
* Tawney, R. H. "The rise of the gentry, 1558–1640." ''Economic History Review'' 11.1 (1941): 1–38. [https://www.jstor.org/stable/2590708 online]; launched a historiographical debate
* Tawney, R. H. "The rise of the gentry: a postscript." ''Economic History Review'' 7.1 (1954): 91–97. [https://www.jstor.org/stable/2591229 online]
===China===
* Bastid-Bruguiere, Marianne. "Currents of social change." ''The Cambridge History of China 11.2 1800–1911'' (1980): pp. 536–571.
* Brook, Timothy. ''Praying for power: Buddhism and the formation of gentry society in late-Ming China'' (Brill, 2020).
* Chang, Chung-li. ''The Chinese gentry: studies on their role in nineteenth-century Chinese society'' (1955) [https://archive.org/details/chinesegentrystu0000chan online]
* Chuzo, Ichiko; "The role of the gentry: an hypothesis." in ''China in Revolution: The First Phase, 1900–1913'' ed. by Mary C. Wright  (1968) pp: 297–317.
* Miller, Harry. ''State versus Gentry in Late Ming Dynasty China, 1572–1644'' (Springer, 2008).
==External links==
{{wiktionary-inline|gentry}}
* {{Commons category-inline|Gentry}}
{{Social class}}
{{Authority control}}
[[Category:Gentry| ]]
[[Category:High society (social class)]]
[[Category:Nobility]]