View source for Language deprivation in children with hearing loss

{{Short description|none}}
{{Multiple issues|
{{weasel|date=February 2018}}
{{unbalanced|date=February 2018}}
{{globalize|date=February 2018}}
{{more citations needed|date=February 2018}}
}}
'''Language deprivation in deaf and hard-of-hearing children''' is a delay in [[language development]] that occurs when sufficient exposure to language, spoken or [[Sign language|signed]], is not provided in the first few years of a deaf or hard of hearing child's life, often called the [[Critical period hypothesis|critical]] or sensitive period. Early intervention, parental involvement, and other resources all work to prevent language deprivation. Children who experience limited access to language—spoken or signed—may not develop the necessary skills to successfully assimilate into the academic learning environment.<ref name=":02">{{Cite book |last1=Marschark |first1=Marc |url=http://www.oxfordscholarship.com/view/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195368673.001.0001/acprof-9780195368673 |title=Deaf Cognition |last2=Hauser |first2=Peter C |date=2008-07-10 |publisher=Oxford University Press |isbn=978-0-19-536867-3 |doi=10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195368673.003.0012}}</ref> There are various educational approaches for teaching deaf and hard of hearing individuals. Decisions about language instruction is dependent upon a number of factors including extent of hearing loss, availability of programs, and family dynamics.
==Access to language==
=== Typical language development for deaf and hard of hearing children ===
Similar linguistic milestones are found in both signed and spoken languages.<ref>{{Cite web |title=ASL Stages of Development (CSD) |url=https://www.nysd.net/asl-stages-of-development-csd.html |access-date=2022-11-13 |website=NYSD |language=en}}</ref><ref>{{Cite web |title=Age-Appropriate Speech and Language Milestones - Stanford Medicine Children's Health |url=https://www.stanfordchildrens.org/en/topic/default?id=age-appropriate-speech-and-language-milestones-90-P02170 |access-date=2022-11-13 |website=www.stanfordchildrens.org}}</ref> Reduced access to language may result in behavior problems as the child does not have a way to express his wants or needs.<ref name="halleigsti">{{cite journal |last1=Hall |first1=Matthew L. |last2=Eigsti |first2=Inge-Marie |last3=Bortfeld |first3=Heather |last4=Lillo-Martin |first4=Diane |date=January 2017 |title=Auditory Deprivation Does Not Impair Executive Function, But Language Deprivation Might: Evidence From a Parent-Report Measure in Deaf Native Signing Children |journal=Journal of Deaf Studies and Deaf Education |volume=22 |issue=1 |pages=9–21 |doi=10.1093/deafed/enw054 |pmc=5189172 |pmid=27624307}}</ref><ref name=":144">{{Cite journal |last1=Humphries |first1=Tom |last2=Kushalnagar |first2=Poorna |last3=Mathur |first3=Gaurav |last4=Napoli |first4=Donna Jo |last5=Padden |first5=Carol |last6=Pollard |first6=Robert |last7=Rathmann |first7=Christian |last8=Smith |first8=Scott |date=2014-12-01 |title=What Medical Education can do to Ensure Robust Language Development in Deaf Children |journal=Medical Science Educator |language=en |volume=24 |issue=4 |pages=409–419 |doi=10.1007/s40670-014-0073-7 |s2cid=73150101 |issn=2156-8650|doi-access=free }}</ref><ref>{{Cite journal |last1=Stevenson |first1=Jim |last2=Kreppner |first2=Jana |last3=Pimperton |first3=Hannah |last4=Worsfold |first4=Sarah |last5=Kennedy |first5=Colin |date=May 2015 |title=Emotional and behavioural difficulties in children and adolescents with hearing impairment: a systematic review and meta-analysis |journal=European Child & Adolescent Psychiatry |language=en |volume=24 |issue=5 |pages=477–496 |doi=10.1007/s00787-015-0697-1 |issn=1018-8827 |pmc=4419186 |pmid=25758233}}</ref> Language deprivation may also affect their neurological development.<ref name="halleigsti" /><ref name=":42">[https://www.researchgate.net/publication/331585895_Language_Deprivation_in_Deaf_Children_EHDI_Poster_2019 Language_Deprivation_in_Deaf_Children_EHDI_Poster_2019]</ref> The timing and quality of language exposure are more important than hearing status for developing age-appropriate skills.<ref name=":42" />
=== Technology and interventions ===
With currently available technology and interventions, children are likely to successfully achieve age-expected spoken language skills. Technology such as [[cochlear implant]]s, [[hearing aids]], and [[bone-anchored hearing aid]]s can potentially help provide access to spoken language. This access can vary greatly from person to person due to factors such as cause and severity of deafness, the age of when hearing technology is introduced, and time of language exposure. [[Speech therapy]], [[audiology]], and other services have the potential to help maximize the access provided through hearing technology. Even for children using hearing technology, the age they were exposed to language (whether visual or spoken) will have a role in how much they can benefit from the technology. Speaking, though, is not the only option for communication for deaf and hard of hearing children. Language exposure, either signed or spoken, from birth builds and strengthens brain tissue that can be used in a variety of language contexts in the future. For example, if in the future the person undergoes surgery to receive a cochlear implant, their language exposure from birth can be an important factor in regards to acquisition of spoken language aided by the implant.<ref>{{Citation|title=BL2: What the Eyes Reveal About the Brain| date=2 May 2014 |url=https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=snE4pD882v4|language=en|access-date=2021-04-20}}</ref>
All too often, though, deaf and hard of hearing children do not follow the typical [[language development]] timeline. When a child is deprived of language from the beginning, they can be dramatically behind their peers in terms of hitting milestones. This can impact learning for the rest of their lives.<ref name="Hall2017">{{cite journal |last1=Hall |first1=Wyatte C. |date=May 2017 |title=What You Don't Know Can Hurt You: The Risk of Language Deprivation by Impairing Sign Language Development in Deaf Children |journal=Maternal and Child Health Journal |volume=21 |issue=5 |pages=961–965 |doi=10.1007/s10995-017-2287-y |pmc=5392137 |pmid=28185206}}</ref>
=== Age and quality of language exposure ===
The first five years of a child's life is a critical time for [[cognitive development]] and the establishment of their native language.<ref name="Skotara et al 2012">{{cite journal |last1=Skotara |first1=Nils |last2=Salden |first2=Uta |last3=Kügow |first3=Monique |last4=Hänel-Faulhaber |first4=Barbara |last5=Röder |first5=Brigitte |date=December 2012 |title=The influence of language deprivation in early childhood on L2 processing: An ERP comparison of deaf native signers and deaf signers with a delayed language acquisition |journal=BMC Neuroscience |volume=13 |issue=1 |pages=44 |doi=10.1186/1471-2202-13-44 |pmc=3404011 |pmid=22554360 |doi-access=free }}</ref> This [[Critical period hypothesis|critical period]] deems the first few years of life as the period during which the brain is most primed for language development. The critical period is also referred to as the sensitive period for language development, or the language acquisition window. Studies on [[Neonatal stroke|stroke in infancy]] and typical language development unveiled a critical period for language acquisition.<ref>{{cite book |last1=Lenneberg |first1=Eric H. |last2=Chomsky |first2=Noam |last3=Marx |first3=Otto |title=Biological Foundations of Language |date=15 January 1967 |publisher=Wiley |isbn=978-0-471-52626-1 }}{{page needed|date=October 2021}}</ref> After this critical period of language acquisition, it remains exceedingly laborious and strenuous to master a native language.<ref>{{cite book |last1=Siegler |first1=Robert S |title=How children develop |date=2006 |publisher=Worth Pub |isbn=978-0-7167-6113-6 |oclc=946919425 }}{{page needed|date=October 2021}}</ref> Language development is not impossible after the five year mark, but will likely bear the cognitive and linguistic characteristics of language deprivation.
Timing and quality of language exposure, not language used or how many languages used, are the factors that matter most when determining language and literacy outcomes.<ref>{{cite journal |last1=Petitto |first1=Laura-Ann |last2=Dunbar |first2=KN |title=New Discoveries From the Bilingual Brain and Mind Across the Life Span: Implications for Education |journal=Mind, Brain, and Education |date=December 2009 |volume=3 |issue=4 |pages=185–197 |doi=10.1111/j.1751-228X.2009.01069.x |pmid=22545067 |pmc=3338206 }}</ref><ref>{{cite journal |last1=Kovelman |first1=Ioulia |last2=Baker |first2=Stephanie A. |last3=Petitto |first3=Laura-Ann |title=Age of first bilingual language exposure as a new window into bilingual reading development |journal=Bilingualism: Language and Cognition |date=July 2008 |volume=11 |issue=2 |pages=203–223 |doi=10.1017/S1366728908003386 |pmid=19823598 |pmc=2759761 }}</ref><ref>{{Cite journal|last=Genesee|first=Fred|date=April 2009|title=Early childhood bilingualism: Perils and possibilities|url=http://talkingtogether.com.au/wp-content/uploads/2018/09/early-childhood-bilingualism-perils-and-possibilities-fred-genesee-april-09.pdf|journal=Journal of Applied Research on Learning}}</ref> When deaf and hard of hearing children are fully exposed to natural language along a timeline equivalent to their hearing peers, they will acquire language along equivalent milestones. This timeline includes babbling around 10 months and first sign around one year.<ref>{{Cite book|last=Pichler|first=Deborah|url=https://www.researchgate.net/publication/260119989|title=Sign Language - An international handbook|year=2012|pages=647–686}}</ref><ref name=":14">{{Cite web|date=2015|title=Setting Language in Motion: Family Supports and Early Intervention for Babies Who are Deaf or Hard of Hearing|url=https://www.gallaudet.edu/clerc-center-sites/Documents/Clerc%20Microsite/Assets/Module4-CommunicationLanguageMilestones.pdf|website=Gallaudet University}}</ref> The full timeline of children who use sign was published by [[Gallaudet University Press]] and is a resource that parents of deaf children can use to track their child's language development which includes milestones like following eye gaze, pointing, and imitating [[handshape]]s.<ref name=":14" /> This resource is unique because it is normed for deaf and hard-of-hearing children, and can be used to establish parent expectations for their child's language progress.<ref>{{cite journal |last1=Simms |first1=Laurene |last2=Baker |first2=Sharon |last3=Clark |first3=M. Diane |title=The Standardized Visual Communication and Sign Language Checklist for Signing Children |journal=Sign Language Studies |date=2013 |volume=14 |issue=1 |pages=101–124 |id={{Project MUSE|523171}} |doi=10.1353/sls.2013.0029 |s2cid=144795083 }}</ref>
=== Critical period ===
The critical stage in language development is important in deaf individuals.<ref name=Newport1990>{{cite journal |last1=Newport |first1=Elissa L. |title=Maturational Constraints on Language Learning |journal=Cognitive Science |date=January 1990 |volume=14 |issue=1 |pages=11–28 |doi=10.1207/s15516709cog1401_2 |s2cid=207056257 |doi-access=free }}</ref> Deaf individuals who lack exposure to [[sign language]] at a young age fail to achieve full language proficiency as they develop.<ref name=Newport1990/> Inconsistencies in exposure to a natural language during this [[critical period]] of language acquisition could result in persistent symptoms, known as language deprivation syndrome.<ref name="Hall et al 2017">{{cite journal |last1=Hall |first1=Wyatte C. |last2=Levin |first2=Leonard L. |last3=Anderson |first3=Melissa L. |title=Language deprivation syndrome: a possible neurodevelopmental disorder with sociocultural origins |journal=Social Psychiatry and Psychiatric Epidemiology |date=June 2017 |volume=52 |issue=6 |pages=761–776 |doi=10.1007/s00127-017-1351-7 |pmid=28204923 |pmc=5469702 }}</ref> Symptoms of language deprivation syndrome include language dysfluency (e.g., lack of fluency in native language), knowledge gaps about the world around them, abnormal thinking, mood and/or behavior disorders, academic, and literacy delays.<ref>{{Cite book|last=Gulati|first=Sanjay|title=Language Deprivation and Deaf Mental Health|date=3 September 2018|isbn=978-1-315-16672-8|pages=24–53|publisher=Routledge/Taylor & Francis }}</ref> It was found that deaf individuals who acquired sign language after five years of age were not nearly as proficient as deaf individuals who were exposed to sign language from birth.<ref name=Newport1990/>
==== Misconceptions of critical period ====
One misconception is that deaf children will be at a disadvantage since they lack access to auditory input and, therefore, deafness results in delayed development.<ref name=":0">{{Cite web|title=National Association of the Deaf - NAD|url=https://www.nad.org/about-us/position-statements/position-statement-on-early-cognitive-and-language-development-and-education-of-deaf-and-hard-of-hearing-children/|access-date=2021-03-21|website=www.nad.org|language=en-US}}</ref><ref>{{cite journal |last1=Humphries |first1=Tom |last2=Kushalnagar |first2=Poorna |last3=Mathur |first3=Gaurav |last4=Napoli |first4=Donna Jo |last5=Rathmann |first5=Christian |last6=Smith |first6=Scott |title=Support for parents of deaf children: Common questions and informed, evidence-based answers |journal=International Journal of Pediatric Otorhinolaryngology |date=March 2019 |volume=118 |pages=134–142 |doi=10.1016/j.ijporl.2018.12.036 |pmid=30623850 |s2cid=58621632 |doi-access=free }}</ref> Because of this, a focus on auditory language exposure for deaf children is usually recommended. However, deafness, or the lack of auditory input, is not a cause of delayed development, language deprivation is. Profoundly deaf children who had early exposure to a visual signed language possess high levels of language organization.<ref name=":0" /> If development of spoken language is desired, listening technology (hearing aids or cochlear implants) can help, but the overall process is enhanced when paired with sign language. These devices vary greatly in benefit to different hard of hearing and deaf individuals and do not guarantee better auditory understanding or speaking ability.<ref name=":0" />
Other studies address the neurological differences between individuals who have experienced language deprivation and those who did not. The first five years of life are foundational for many skills as the brain develops the neural connections and processes that will be built upon for years to come. Without full access and exposure to [[natural language]] during the critical period, the brain does not have the tools it needs to build the typical framework for processing and producing language.<ref name="Skotara et al 2012"/><ref name="Cheng Roth 2019">{{cite journal |last1=Cheng |first1=Qi |last2=Roth |first2=Austin |last3=Halgren |first3=Eric |last4=Mayberry |first4=Rachel I. |title=Effects of Early Language Deprivation on Brain Connectivity: Language Pathways in Deaf Native and Late First-Language Learners of American Sign Language |journal=Frontiers in Human Neuroscience |date=19 September 2019 |volume=13 |pages=320 |doi=10.3389/fnhum.2019.00320 |pmid=31607879 |pmc=6761297 |doi-access=free }}</ref><ref>{{cite journal |last1=Leybaert |first1=Jacqueline |last2=D'hondt |first2=Murielle |title=Neurolinguistic development in deaf children: the effect of early language experience |journal=International Journal of Audiology |date=January 2003 |volume=42 |issue=sup1 |pages=34–40 |doi=10.3109/14992020309074622 |pmid=12918608 |s2cid=39122614 |url=https://dipot.ulb.ac.be/dspace/bitstream/2013/165973/3/leybaert2003b.pdf }}</ref><ref name="Mayberry et al 2011">{{cite journal |last1=Mayberry |first1=Rachel I. |last2=Chen |first2=Jen-Kai |last3=Witcher |first3=Pamela |last4=Klein |first4=Denise |title=Age of acquisition effects on the functional organization of language in the adult brain |journal=Brain and Language |date=October 2011 |volume=119 |issue=1 |pages=16–29 |doi=10.1016/j.bandl.2011.05.007 |pmid=21705060 |s2cid=18930728 }}</ref> In turn, language deprivation can cause abnormalities in other areas of cognitive functioning, particularly the establishment of concepts, processing things in a set order, and [[Executive functions|executive function]].<ref>{{cite journal |last1=Kral |first1=Andrej |last2=Kronenberger |first2=William G |last3=Pisoni |first3=David B |last4=O'Donoghue |first4=Gerard M |title=Neurocognitive factors in sensory restoration of early deafness: a connectome model |journal=The Lancet Neurology |date=May 2016 |volume=15 |issue=6 |pages=610–621 |doi=10.1016/s1474-4422(16)00034-x |pmid=26976647 |pmc=6260790 }}</ref> Similar results were seen in deaf individuals. Language deprivation influenced altered neural activation patterns in deaf individuals that were exposed to sign language later, as compared to deaf individuals who received typical language development.<ref name="Mayberry et al 2011"/>
==== Language acquisition in deaf children ====
Most children naturally learn their native language at a young age.<ref name=":53">{{Cite journal |last1=RAMÍREZ |first1=NAJA FERJAN |last2=LIEBERMAN |first2=AMY M. |last3=MAYBERRY |first3=RACHEL I. |date=2012-01-20 |title=The initial stages of first-language acquisition begun in adolescence: when late looks early |url=http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/s0305000911000535 |journal=Journal of Child Language |volume=40 |issue=2 |pages=391–414 |doi=10.1017/s0305000911000535 |issn=0305-0009 |pmc=3645343 |pmid=22261245}}</ref> Although spoken language is ubiquitous for children who hear normally, congenitally deaf children do not have access to it from birth. Less than 10% of the children with hearing loss are born into deaf families who use sign language as their main communication method.<ref>{{Cite web |title=Quick Statistics About Hearing |url=https://www.nidcd.nih.gov/health/statistics/quick-statistics-hearing |access-date=2022-10-29 |website=NIDCD |language=en}}</ref> Signed languages are natural languages with linguistic features similar to spoken languages, and the developmental milestones are similar to those of spoken languages.<ref name=":63">{{Cite book |last=Stokoe |first=William C. |url=https://www.worldcat.org/oclc/4606225 |title=Sign language structure : the first linguistic analysis of American sign language |date=1978 |publisher=Linstok Press |isbn=0-932130-03-8 |edition=Newly rev |location=Silver Spring, MD |oclc=4606225}}</ref><ref name=":73">{{Cite book |last=Klima |first=Edward S. |url=https://www.worldcat.org/oclc/4569939 |title=The signs of language |date=1979 |others=Ursula Bellugi |isbn=0-674-80795-2 |location=Cambridge, Mass. |oclc=4569939}}</ref><ref name=":83">{{Cite journal |last1=Reilly |first1=Judy Snitzer |last2=Mcintire |first2=Marina |last3=Bellugi |first3=Ursula |date=December 1990 |title=The acquisition of conditionals in American Sign Language: Grammaticized facial expressions |url=https://www.cambridge.org/core/journals/applied-psycholinguistics/article/abs/acquisition-of-conditionals-in-american-sign-language-grammaticized-facial-expressions/9F21CC624EA4FF3732606F0FCD6A8D9A |journal=Applied Psycholinguistics |language=en |volume=11 |issue=4 |pages=369–392 |doi=10.1017/S0142716400009632 |s2cid=146327328 |issn=1469-1817}}</ref><ref name=":93">{{Cite journal |last=Anderson |first=D. |date=2002-06-01 |title=The MacArthur Communicative Development Inventory: Normative Data for American Sign Language |url=https://academic.oup.com/jdsde/article-lookup/doi/10.1093/deafed/7.2.83 |journal=Journal of Deaf Studies and Deaf Education |volume=7 |issue=2 |pages=83–106 |doi=10.1093/deafed/7.2.83|pmid=15451878 |doi-access=free }}</ref><ref name=":102">{{Cite journal |last=Pichler |first=Deborah Chen |date=2002-01-01 |title=Word order variation and acquisition in American Sign Language |url=https://www.jbe-platform.com/content/journals/10.1075/sll.5.1.10pic |journal=Sign Language & Linguistics |language=en |volume=5 |issue=1 |pages=89–97 |doi=10.1075/sll.5.1.10pic |issn=1387-9316}}</ref><ref name=":112">{{Citation |last1=Mayberry |first1=R.I. |title=Sign Language: Acquisition |date=2006 |url=https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/B0080448542008543 |encyclopedia=Encyclopedia of Language & Linguistics |pages=291–296 |publisher=Elsevier |language=en |doi=10.1016/b0-08-044854-2/00854-3 |isbn=978-0-08-044854-1 |access-date=2022-11-16 |last2=Squires |first2=B.}}</ref> Deaf and hard of hearing children with deaf parents who sign with them thus experience language from birth, like typically developing children with normal hearing.<ref name=":122">{{Citation |last1=Mayberry |first1=R.I. |title=Sign Language: Acquisition |date=2006 |url=http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/b0-08-044854-2/00854-3 |encyclopedia=Encyclopedia of Language & Linguistics |pages=291–296 |publisher=Elsevier |doi=10.1016/b0-08-044854-2/00854-3 |isbn=9780080448541 |access-date=2022-05-10 |last2=Squires |first2=B.}}</ref> To succeed, children must acquire at least one language (spoken or signed).<ref name=":144"/> Some researchers and practitioners encourage families to focus exclusively on spoken language.<ref>{{Cite journal |last1=Lim |first1=S. Y. C. |last2=Simser |first2=J. |date=May 2005 |title=Auditory-verbal therapy for children with hearing impairment |url=https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/15937571 |journal=Annals of the Academy of Medicine, Singapore |volume=34 |issue=4 |pages=307–312 |doi=10.47102/annals-acadmedsg.V34N4p307 |issn=0304-4602 |pmid=15937571}}</ref> There is also evidence that suggests that natural sign languages are beneficial to deaf and hard of hearing children.<ref name=":132">{{Cite journal |last1=Hall |first1=Matthew L. |last2=Hall |first2=Wyatte C. |last3=Caselli |first3=Naomi K. |date=2019-03-13 |title=Deaf children need language, not (just) speech |journal=First Language |volume=39 |issue=4 |pages=367–395 |doi=10.1177/0142723719834102 |issn=0142-7237 |s2cid=140083091|doi-access=free }}</ref>
=== Incidental learning and access to knowledge ===
When hearing individuals share information with each other in a way that is not accessible to deaf individuals, the deaf individuals are not privy to incidental learning experiences. Incidental learning refers to any unprompted, unplanned, or unintended learning.<ref>{{cite book |doi=10.1007/978-1-4419-1428-6_366 |chapter=Incidental Learning |title=Encyclopedia of the Sciences of Learning |year=2012 |last1=Kelly |first1=Steve W. |pages=1517–1518 |isbn=978-1-4419-1427-9 }}</ref> Hearing children typically learn incidentally when they overhear conversations between other family members in the home. This type of learning occurs in everyday communication including emotional expression, navigating arguments, and managing triggers. Language deprivation syndrome coupled with the lack of these every day incidental learning experiences may impact mental health, physical health, and academic advancements.<ref name="Hall et al 2017"/><ref>{{cite journal |last1=Traxler |first1=C. B. |title=The Stanford Achievement Test, 9th Edition: National Norming and Performance Standards for Deaf and Hard-of-Hearing Students |journal=Journal of Deaf Studies and Deaf Education |date=1 September 2000 |volume=5 |issue=4 |pages=337–348 |doi=10.1093/deafed/5.4.337 |pmid=15454499 |doi-access=free }}</ref> A lack of incidental learning can also limit an individual's general wealth of knowledge and comprehension skills used to learn about and understand the world around them.<ref name="Cheng Roth 2019"/> Without the wealth of knowledge and language skills hearing children typically demonstrate, deaf and hard of hearing children can arrive at school already behind their peers. This trend can continue as they spend school years working to learn the things their hearing peers picked up effortlessly in the home before starting school. Incidental learning is possible for deaf and hard-of-hearing children when the family uses language that is fully accessible to all family members and includes the child with atypical hearing in family communications directly and indirectly.
=== Early accessible communication ===
The importance of early accessible communication with family and peers can be seen in "dinner table syndrome"—the experience of observing spoken conversations between other family members and not understanding these conversations.<ref>{{cite journal |last1=Fellinger |first1=Johannes |last2=Holzinger |first2=Daniel |last3=Pollard |first3=Robert |title=Mental health of deaf people |journal=The Lancet |date=March 2012 |volume=379 |issue=9820 |pages=1037–1044 |doi=10.1016/S0140-6736(11)61143-4 |pmid=22423884 |s2cid=20731408 }}</ref> As statistics show, 90–95% of deaf children are born to hearing parents, thus, they may often experience this phenomenon if their family does not incorporate sign language into their communication.<ref>{{cite journal |last1=Mitchell |first1=Ross E |last2=Karchmer |first2=Michael A |title=Chasing the Mythical Ten Percent: Parental Hearing Status of Deaf and Hard of Hearing Students in the United States |journal=Sign Language Studies |date=2004 |volume=4 |issue=2 |pages=138–163 |id={{Project MUSE|51652}} |doi=10.1353/sls.2004.0005 |s2cid=145578065 }}</ref><ref>{{cite journal |last1=Mitchell |first1=Ross E |last2=Karchmer |first2=Michael A |title=Parental Hearing Status and Signing among Deaf and Hard of Hearing Students |journal=Sign Language Studies |date=2005 |volume=5 |issue=2 |pages=231–244 |id={{Project MUSE|176936}} |doi=10.1353/sls.2005.0004 |s2cid=143689745 }}</ref> These parents may be unfamiliar with Deaf culture and are often unaware of the best communication methods to assist their children with developing into contributing members of society.<ref>{{Cite book|last=Moores|first=D|title=Educating the Deaf: Psychology, Principles, and Practices |edition=5th |publisher=Houghton Mifflin Company|year=2001|location=Boston, MA}}{{page needed|date=October 2021}}</ref><ref>{{cite journal |last1=Stacey |first1=Lim |title=Children with hearing loss: developing listening and talking, birth to six, 3rd edition |journal=International Journal of Audiology |date=4 May 2017 |volume=56 |issue=5 |pages=358–359 |doi=10.1080/14992027.2016.1270470 }}</ref> A famous Deaf artist, Susan Dupor, painted an art piece called "Family Dog" to represent this experience. Her artwork represents the feeling of isolation being deaf in an all-hearing family.<ref>{{Cite web|last=Culture|first=Deaf|date=2015-07-14|title=Deaf Culture: Family Dog|url=https://deafcuture.blogspot.com/2015/07/7.html|access-date=2021-03-21|website=Deaf Culture}}</ref> This painting was designed to emphasize deaf family members' perspectives with the blurred faces of the family metaphorically representing the difficulties of [[lip reading]]. Only 30–45% of the English language can be understood solely through lip reading.<ref>{{Cite web|last1=Callis|first1=Lydia|date=2016-03-23|title=Lip Reading Is No Simple Task|url=https://www.huffpost.com/entry/lip-reading-is-no-simple-task_b_9526300|access-date=2021-03-21|website=HuffPost|language=en}}</ref> In these situations, deaf children are unable to participate in the conversations without using a commonly accessible language.<ref>{{cite journal |last1=Hauser |first1=Peter C. |last2=O'Hearn |first2=Amanda |last3=McKee |first3=Michael |last4=Steider |first4=Anne |last5=Thew |first5=Denise |title=Deaf Epistemology: Deafhood and Deafness |journal=American Annals of the Deaf |date=2010 |volume=154 |issue=5 |pages=486–492 |id={{Project MUSE|377925}} |doi=10.1353/aad.0.0120 |pmid=20415284 |s2cid=41199044 }}</ref> Similarly, these experiences occur during social engagements where deaf individuals cannot communicate with other individuals through a spoken language.
== Prevention ==
=== Language ===
==== Modality ====
When it comes to language deprivation prevention, modality, which in this case means using either spoken or signed language, does not matter to the brain as long as it is fully accessible. Studies from [[Laura-Ann Petitto|Dr. Laura-Ann Petitto]] reveal that brain tissue used for language accepts both auditory and visual input to develop language pathways. This is because the brain focuses on patterns in language, whether it is a pattern of sounds or a pattern of hand movements.<ref>{{Cite web|title=Language is more than speaking: How the brain processes sign language {{!}} Max Planck Neuroscience|date=16 February 2021 |url=https://maxplanckneuroscience.org/language-is-more-than-speaking-how-the-brain-processes-sign-language/|access-date=2021-03-21|language=en-US}}</ref> Access to the full range of patterns embedded in a language is key for developing strong language pathways in the brain.<ref>{{Cite web|last=Vries|first=Ellen de|date=2017-07-17|title=Patterns in language and language in patterns.|url=https://medium.com/clear-left-thinking/patterns-in-language-and-language-in-patterns-73bd03ca3ec0|access-date=2021-03-21|website=Medium|language=en}}</ref> The brain connections developed in response to linguistic input can then be utilized if/when the child is exposed to a second language. Even in cases where the brain receives absolutely no auditory input, the brain is still able to develop typical language skills when exposed to high-quality visual language. Hearing technologies can also be used to grant spoken language access, though the quality of this access varies from person to person.
==== Methods ====
Communication methods used with deaf children may include spoken language, signed language, systems or philosophies such as [[cued speech]], [[Signing Exact English]], and other forms of [[manually coded language]], as well as philosophies and techniques like [[simultaneous communication]] or [[total communication]]. Signed languages can provide the child with full language access, but they pose challenges to the family as they work to learn a new language. Manually coded language systems as well as philosophies like simultaneous communication or total communication are more closely linked to the spoken language used in the area and therefore are usually easier for acquisition by people whose native language is the spoken language of the area. However, these methods may not have the same linguistic characteristics as natural languages, such as morphology, phonology, syntax, and semantics.<ref name=":123">{{Cite web|title=Language In Brief|url=https://www.asha.org/Practice-Portal/Clinical-Topics/Spoken-Language-Disorders/Language-In-Brief/|access-date=|website=American Speech-Language-Hearing Association}}</ref><ref name=":52">{{Cite web|last=CMPASL|date=April 21, 2016|title=ASL as a Foreign Language|url=https://ctlsites.uga.edu/cse/asl-as-a-foreign-language/|website=Critical Studies in Education}}</ref>
Children whose parents opt for spoken language may use hearing technology to receive spoken language input and are encouraged to go to speech therapy to work on expressive language skills, leading them to speak and listen to language. Medical professionals could perform cochlear implant surgery on these individuals if elected, or audiologists could test residual hearing and order hearing aids. This method is often used by families who utilize spoken language at home and cannot or will not learn sign language. Modern research reveals that there is a wide range of results from this method as there are many background factors that impact the success of this method, such as family socioeconomic status, location, parental employment, quality of the language model at home, and the child's residual hearing.<ref>{{cite journal |last1=Glennon |first1=Erin |last2=Svirsky |first2=Mario A |last3=Froemke |first3=Robert C |title=Auditory cortical plasticity in cochlear implant users |journal=Current Opinion in Neurobiology |date=February 2020 |volume=60 |pages=108–114 |doi=10.1016/j.conb.2019.11.003 |pmid=31864104 |pmc=7002179 }}</ref><ref>{{Cite web|date=2017-11-02|title=6 Pre-Implant Factors That Can Influence Success With Your Device|url=https://blog.medel.com/6-pre-implant-factors-that-can-influence-success-with-your-device/|access-date=|website=The MED-EL Blog|language=en-US}}</ref><ref>{{cite book |doi=10.1159/000094644 |chapter=Factors Influencing Spoken Language Outcomes in Children following Early Cochlear Implantation |title=Cochlear and Brainstem Implants |series=Advances in Oto-Rhino-Laryngology |year=2006 |last1=Geers |first1=Ann E. |volume=64 |pages=50–65 |pmid=16891836 |isbn=978-3-8055-8157-8 }}</ref>
==== Code switching ====
{{unreferenced section|date=May 2021}}
By prioritizing the child's visual and auditory language equally from birth, children are given every opportunity and tool to develop language. As children grow and become adults, they may naturally prefer one modality over the other, but will have developed useful skills in both. [[Code-switching]] allows bilingual individuals to experience all the benefits of each language they know. For deaf and hard of hearing children especially, a strong language foundation in a signed language paired with a spoken language (or written) sets the stage for literacy later on. In a study conducted with Deaf and hearing individuals, psychologists found that deaf children born to deaf parents were the most proficient at code-switching. In turn, deaf children born to hearing parents struggled more with the ability to code-switch and communicate in various conditions. Parents' hearing status and age that the child is exposed to language affect deaf children's ability to code-switch.<ref>{{Cite journal |last1=Hoffmeister |first1=Robert |last2=Moores |first2=Donald F. |date=1987 |title=Code Switching in Deaf Adults |url=http://dx.doi.org/10.1353/aad.2012.0770 |journal=American Annals of the Deaf |volume=132 |issue=1 |pages=31–34 |doi=10.1353/aad.2012.0770 |pmid=3630869 |s2cid=27972463 |issn=1543-0375}}</ref> Deaf children may lack proficiency or fluency in either language during early language-learning development, they still engage in code switching activities, in which they go back and forth between signing and English to communicate.<ref>{{Cite journal |last1=Andrews |first1=Jean F. |last2=Rusher |first2=Melissa |date=2010 |title=Codeswitching Techniques: Evidence-Based Instructional Practices for the ASL/English Bilingual Classroom |url=http://dx.doi.org/10.1353/aad.2010.0036 |journal=American Annals of the Deaf |volume=155 |issue=4 |pages=407–424 |doi=10.1353/aad.2010.0036 |pmid=21305977 |s2cid=23734679 |issn=1543-0375}}</ref> Code switching from oral speech is difficult for Deaf children. Lexical borrowing and code switching do occur between sign and oral languages.<ref>{{Cite journal |last=Berent |first=Gerald P. |date=December 1993 |title=Language contact in the American deaf community. Ceil Lucas and Clayton Valli. San Diego, CA: Academic Press, 1992. Pp. xviii + 161. $32.50. |url=http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/s0272263100012493 |journal=Studies in Second Language Acquisition |volume=15 |issue=4 |pages=531–532 |doi=10.1017/s0272263100012493 |s2cid=146406644 |issn=0272-2631}}</ref> Lexicon is similar to borrowing and oral speech to code switching.{{Clarify|date=October 2022}}
==== Conflict and controversies ====
{{more citations needed|section|date=May 2021}}
There has been much conflict and controversy regarding language modality for deaf and hard of hearing children. When it is discovered that a child is deaf or hard of hearing, this assessment is usually made via a hearing test in a medical setting. The first people the parents interact with after their child's hearing status is identified can be very influential.<ref>{{Cite journal |last1=Easson |first1=Anne |last2=Walter |first2=Simone |date=December 2017 |title=Hearing-impaired young people – a physician's guide |journal=Clinical Medicine |volume=17 |issue=6 |pages=521–524 |doi=10.7861/clinmedicine.17-6-521 |issn=1470-2118 |pmc=6297701 |pmid=29196352}}</ref> The Joint Commission on Infant Hearing recommends that  professionals working with families of deaf infants should provide parents with unbiased, well-rounded information to help guide decisions they will need to make.<ref>{{cite journal |last=The Joint Committee on Infant Hearing|date=2019 |title=Year 2019 Position Statement: Principles and Guidelines for Early Hearing Detection and Intervention Programs |url=https://digitalcommons.usu.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1104&context=jehdi |journal=Journal of Early Hearing Detection and Intervention |volume=4 |issue=2 |page=21 |quote=It is often the audiologist who provides the first information to the family for an identified child following diagnosis. The audiologist has the responsibility for communicating the information to the family in an empathetic, non-biased, open-ended fashion, and in a language (spoken or signed) that is accessible to the parents, using interpreters/translators as necessary |access-date=2023-03-27}}</ref> Systemic bias towards deafness, known as [[audism]], can impact what information and guidance parents receive. If a deaf child does not meet appropriate early benchmarks for the first chosen communication method or modality, it is important to consider additional or different methods, in order to prevent [[language delay]], or in extreme cases, [[language deprivation]].<ref>{{Cite book |last=Glickman |first=Neil S. |date=2018-09-03 |title=Language Deprivation and Deaf Mental Health |url=http://dx.doi.org/10.4324/9781315166728 |doi=10.4324/9781315166728|isbn=9781315166728 |s2cid=149837579 }}</ref>
=== Early intervention ===
Early intervention is one of the main methods of preventing language deprivation. A main focus of early intervention programs and services for deaf and hard of hearing children is language development. Early interventionists are able to work with the family during the early, critical years for language acquisition.<ref name=":62">{{Cite web|last=CDC|date=2018-04-11|title=What is "Early Intervention" and is my child eligible?|url=https://www.cdc.gov/ncbddd/actearly/parents/states.html|access-date=2021-03-21|website=Centers for Disease Control and Prevention|language=en-us}}</ref> Early intervention can take many forms and usually depends on where the family lives. In the United States, the School for the Deaf in the state the family lives in likely provides programs and resources. Other services can come from the state itself, national programs, and educational centers. These services may be paid for through state and federal funds. Independent organizations like the [[National Association of the Deaf (United States)|National Association of the Deaf]] and the [[American Society for Deaf Children]] in the United States and the [[National Deaf Children's Society]] in London can provide additional resources and support.<ref name=":72">{{Cite web|title=National Association of the Deaf - NAD|url=https://www.nad.org/resources/early-intervention-for-infants-and-toddlers/|access-date=2021-03-21|website=www.nad.org}}</ref>
==== Deaf mentor ====
Children whose parents select the signed language route can benefit from signed language models, such as a Deaf mentor.<ref>{{Cite web|title=Deaf Mentor Program – Outreach Services for the Deaf, Hard of Hearing, and Deafblind|url=https://wesp-dhh.wi.gov/outreach/servicesresources/dmp/|access-date=2021-04-19|language=en-US}}</ref> Deaf mentors provide a role model for the child that they may not see anywhere else, as well as providing a language model for the whole family. Deaf mentors can help parents understand what their deaf child is capable of and establish high expectations for the child to fulfill their potential.<ref>{{Cite web |title=Hands & Voices :: Communication Considerations |url=https://www.handsandvoices.org/comcon/articles/mentorsRolemodels.htm |access-date=2023-02-12 |website=www.handsandvoices.org}}</ref> When working with a Deaf mentor, the family typically takes signing classes and engages in Deaf community events in addition to working with the mentor.{{Citation needed|date=May 2021|reason=This statement is one that definitely has sources that can back it up.}} Everyone, including the child, learns to sign together and use their skills to communicate with one another with the mentor helping to facilitate mastery by being a native-level language model.<ref>{{Cite web |title=Ski Hi Deaf Mentor Program |url=https://deaf-mentor.skihi.org/ |access-date=2022-10-13 |website=deaf-mentor.skihi.org}}</ref>
==== Success of early intervention ====
A team must be cooperative for the success of early intervention. Members of the early intervention team can include education and medical professionals, therapists (speech, occupational, physical, psychological), specialists (vision, hearing/deafness, family dynamics, and kinesthetic), the audiologist, a social worker, the interventionist, and the family.<ref>{{Cite web|title=National Association of the Deaf - NAD|url=https://www.nad.org/resources/early-intervention-for-infants-and-toddlers/information-for-parents/early-intervention-services/|access-date=2021-04-20|website=www.nad.org}}</ref> A Deaf mentor can also be included as a key member of the team. Early interventionists can also work with the family in the home through game play, language and communication instruction and activities, providing strategies, helping establish routines and discipline methods, and more.<ref name=":82">{{Cite web|title=Deaf Mentor Program – Outreach Services for the Deaf, Hard of Hearing, and Deafblind|url=https://wesp-dhh.wi.gov/outreach/servicesresources/dmp/|access-date=2021-03-21|language=en-US}}</ref> Home visits are one way early intervention can take place, but it is not limited to the home given the broad range of services provided. Geographic location of the family influences available services and resources due to distance, but virtual intervention measures have helped address this challenge.
Early intervention has also helped prevent language deprivation through [[Universal neonatal hearing screening|newborn hearing screening]].<ref>{{Cite journal |last1=Neumann |first1=Katrin |last2=Mathmann |first2=Philipp |last3=Chadha |first3=Shelly |last4=Euler |first4=Harald A. |last5=White |first5=Karl R. |date=2022-01-05 |title=Newborn Hearing Screening Benefits Children, but Global Disparities Persist |journal=Journal of Clinical Medicine |volume=11 |issue=1 |pages=271 |doi=10.3390/jcm11010271 |pmid=35012010 |pmc=8746089 |issn=2077-0383|doi-access=free }}</ref> Before universal hearing screening was established in hospitals shortly after birth, many deaf children's hearing status was not identified until years after birth, when language milestones were not being met. At the time of identification, the child was already behind. Newborn hearing screening supports early identification and allows professionals to help keep the child's language development on track.<ref name=":92">{{Cite web|title=Universal Newborn Hearing Screening|url=https://www.nationwidechildrens.org/specialties/audiology/universal-newborn-hearing-screening|access-date=2021-03-21|website=www.nationwidechildrens.org|language=en}}</ref>
=== Legislation ===
Another way language deprivation can be prevented is through legislation providing standards for language access in [[deaf education]]. Globally, there are a number of laws and policies that relate to the topic of language deprivation.{{clarify|date=May 2021}} Other related laws in the United States focusing on special education including deaf education include national legislation such as the [[Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990|Americans with Disabilities Act]] (ADA), [[Individuals with Disabilities Education Act]] (IDEA), and the [[Rehabilitation Act of 1973]].<ref name=":92"/>
==== LEAD-K ====
One current{{when|date=May 2021}} example of state legislation in the United States is [[LEAD-K]], Language Equality & Acquisition for Deaf Kids. LEAD-K varies from state to state because each state is responsible for drafting its version of the bill. The main focus of LEAD-K is full language development in English, ASL, or both, for school readiness and the prevention of language deprivation.<ref name=":123"/> Twelve states have passed LEAD-K legislation as of August 5, 2019.{{update inline|date=May 2021}} The model bill for LEAD-K calls for five actions:
# Create a resource for informal parental use to chart their deaf or hard of hearing children's language growth—this resource-based on milestones for specific language and English literacy development.
# Provide a similar resource for educators that, instead of being created through LEAD-K, is chosen from current methods.
# Distribute the parent and educator resources to relevant individuals and organizations and equip these recipients for its use.
# Hold [[Individualized Education Program]] (IEP) and [[Individual Family Service Plan]] (IFSP) teams accountable for the child's language development progress.
# Establish an advisory committee outline the model bills and the requirements for the composition to ensure the creation of a balanced, knowledgeable, and diverse team.<ref name=":52"/>
===== Controversies =====
LEAD-K has faced opposition from the [[American Speech-Language-Hearing Association]] (ASHA) and American Cochlear Implant Alliance (ACIA). Both groups released statements regarding their concerns about the parental choice of modality for their child.<ref name=":622">{{Cite web |last=CDC |date=2018-04-11 |title=What is "Early Intervention" and is my child eligible? |url=https://www.cdc.gov/ncbddd/actearly/parents/states.html |access-date=2021-03-21 |website=Centers for Disease Control and Prevention |language=en-us}}</ref><ref name=":722">{{Cite web |title=National Association of the Deaf - NAD |url=https://www.nad.org/resources/early-intervention-for-infants-and-toddlers/ |access-date=2021-03-21 |website=www.nad.org}}</ref> They argued that such legislation could negatively impact the services the child receives under IDEA. ACIA also argued that there was a lack of evidence suggesting that ASL benefits all children with a hearing loss.<ref name=":1">{{Cite web |date= |title=Position Paper: Supporting Parent Choice for Children who are Deaf and Hard of Hearing |url=https://www.acialliance.org/page/SupportingParentChoice}}</ref> ASHA expressed its concern that parents might not receive information regarding all possible options and that the policy elevated one modality over all others.<ref name=":2">{{Cite web |title=Language Equality and Acquisition for Deaf Kids (LEAD-K) |url=https://www.asha.org/advocacy/lead-k/ |access-date=2022-11-11 |website=American Speech-Language-Hearing Association}}</ref> LEAD-K responded to these concerns by reiterating their commitment to deaf and hard of hearing children achieving age appropriate language milestones regardless of the language chosen by the parents and that they were not advocating for one modality over another.<ref>{{Cite web |date=2019-02-28 |title=OPEN LETTER to American Speech-Language-Hearing Association (ASHA) |url=https://www.lead-k.org/posts/open-letter-to-asha/ |access-date=2022-11-30 |website=Language Equality and Acquisition for Deaf Kids |language=en-US}}</ref><ref>{{Cite web |date=2019-02-21 |title=OPEN LETTER TO American Cochlear Implant Alliance (ACIA) |url=https://www.lead-k.org/posts/open-letter-to-acia/ |access-date=2022-11-30 |website=Language Equality and Acquisition for Deaf Kids |language=en-US}}</ref>
One notable revision came via a collaboration between LEAD-K and the [[Alexander Graham Bell Association for the Deaf and Hard of Hearing|Alexander Graham Bell Association]], a historically spoken-language-only group. These two traditionally opposed groups were able to reach an agreement by focusing on the shared desire to provide equal language acquisition opportunities for deaf and hard of hearing children as are received by their hearing peers and promote the spread of accurate and balanced information.<ref name=":82"/>
== Educational considerations ==
=== General education ===
One education placement for students who are deaf or hard of hearing is general education, also called [[mainstreaming (education)|mainstreaming]]. This method integrates students requiring special education services into a general education classroom based on their skills. The Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (IDEA) mandates the specificities of this integration.<ref>{{Cite web|title=[USC02] 20 USC Ch. 33: EDUCATION OF INDIVIDUALS WITH DISABILITIES|url=https://uscode.house.gov/view.xhtml?path=/prelim@title20/chapter33&edition=prelim|access-date=2021-03-21|website=uscode.house.gov}}</ref> IDEA protects students who are typically a part of the special education classroom by granting the right to access the same education setting as their peers.<ref>{{Cite web|title=About IDEA|url=https://sites.ed.gov/idea/about-idea/|website=Individuals with Disabilities Education Act}}</ref> The student also has a right to the school-provided accommodations and services necessary for them to be able to participate in the general education classroom. The student's needs, services, and goals are detailed in their Individualized Education Plan (IEP). All deaf and hard of hearing students have a right to access general education instruction at their local school with their peers, but it depends on the individual if this option will be the best fit.
==== Classroom accommodations ====
In terms of deaf students, deafness is considered a low-incidence disability. This translates to the possibility of one deaf child belonging to a classroom of all "hearing" children<ref>{{cite journal |last1=Stinson |first1=M |last2=Antia |first2=S |title=Considerations in educating deaf and hard-of-hearing students in inclusive settings |journal=Journal of Deaf Studies and Deaf Education |date=1 September 1999 |volume=4 |issue=3 |pages=163–175 |doi=10.1093/deafed/4.3.163 |pmid=15579885 |doi-access=free }}</ref> and can result in unique barriers. For example, teachers and students within the general education setting may not know sign language, causing significant communication and cultural barriers to social interaction, friendship, and learning. Accommodations such as [[Language interpretation#Sign language|sign language interpreters]], [[communication access real-time translation]] (CART), or an FM system can help with some of these issues, but they will always be present. These accommodations work to increase access, but for students using sign language in general education settings, communication will be indirect since it is through the interpreter. There is always a risk of interpreting miscommunication and even with these accommodations, the learning and social interactions will be an obstacle.<ref name="Paatsch & Toe 2020">{{cite journal |last1=Paatsch |first1=Louise |last2=Toe |first2=Dianne |title=The Impact of Pragmatic Delays for Deaf and Hard of Hearing Students in Mainstream Classrooms |journal=Pediatrics |date=November 2020 |volume=146 |issue=Supplement 3 |pages=S292–S297 |doi=10.1542/peds.2020-0242I |pmid=33139443 |doi-access=free }}</ref>
Students who use hearing technology and spoken language can be supported by reducing classroom background noise, seating close to the instructor, and speakers who face the class while talking one at a time.<ref>{{Cite web|title=Tips for Working with Students who are Deaf or Hard of Hearing|url=https://diversity.utexas.edu/disability/tips-for-working-with-students-who-are-deaf-or-hard-of-hearing/|access-date=2021-04-20|website=diversity.utexas.edu}}</ref> Learning can be difficult when these conditions are not provided.
=== Bilingual–bicultural education ===
Deaf children without early access to signed language remain at risk for starting school unprepared for the rigors of academic learning.<ref name="Paatsch & Toe 2020"/> These different challenges of the deaf children for educational progress are not limited to those with their language exposure.<ref name="Dammeyer & Marschark 2016">{{cite journal |last1=Dammeyer |first1=Jesper |last2=Marschark |first2=Marc |title=Level of Educational Attainment Among Deaf Adults Who Attended Bilingual–Bicultural Programs |journal=Journal of Deaf Studies and Deaf Education |date=October 2016 |volume=21 |issue=4 |pages=394–402 |doi=10.1093/deafed/enw036 |pmid=27235699 |doi-access=free }}</ref> That is where an educational philosophy known as the [[Bilingual–bicultural education|Bilingual-bicultural]] (Bi-Bi) method can benefit deaf students.
This approach began to emerge in schools during the late 1980s in the United States, Denmark, and Sweden.<ref name="Dammeyer & Marschark 2016"/><ref>{{cite journal |last1=Davies |first1=Shawn Neal |title=The Transition toward Bilingual Education of Deaf Children in Sweden & Denmark: Perspectives on Language |journal=Sign Language Studies |date=1991 |volume=1071 |issue=1 |pages=169–195 |doi=10.1353/sls.1991.0023 |s2cid=143879785 }}</ref> In the United States, the ASL/English Bi-Bi is designed to facilitate academic success and provide education to deaf students by teaching sign language as a first language, followed by a written or spoken language (such as English) as their second language.<ref name="Dammeyer & Marschark 2016"/><ref>{{cite journal |last1=Hoffmeister |first1=Robert J. |last2=Caldwell-Harris |first2=Catherine L. |title=Acquiring English as a second language via print: The task for deaf children |journal=Cognition |date=August 2014 |volume=132 |issue=2 |pages=229–242 |doi=10.1016/j.cognition.2014.03.014 |pmid=24813574 |s2cid=37573361 }}</ref><ref>{{cite book |last1=Marschark |first1=Marc |last2=Albertini |first2=John Anthony |last3=Lang |first3=Harry G. |title=Educating Deaf Students: From Research to Practice |date=2002 |publisher=Oxford University Press |isbn=978-0-19-531070-2 }}{{page needed|date=October 2021}}</ref> Furthermore, state schools specifically for the deaf offer exposure to [[Deaf culture]]—a unique facet not provided by general education. Through the Bi-Bi approach, deaf students may develop multiple cultural identities: one based on their hearing status and others based on that of their family or local majority culture.
This method aims to provide deaf and hard of hearing students with instruction in both signed and written languages and exposes students to both Deaf culture and other cultural contexts, i.e. the wider culture of the area or country. Bi-Bi emphasizes that deaf children learn visually and education should be provided through a [[visual language]]. Bi-Bi supporters argue because of the variability in cochlear implant and hearing aid outcomes, sign language access is crucial for preventing deaf and hard-of-hearing children from experiencing inequalities in education. However, since it is a method with a bilingual focus, the written form of the majority spoken language is given equal value. Deaf and hard of hearing students have a right to the same academic content as their peers and to literacy.{{citation needed|date=October 2021}}
== See also ==
* [[Critical period]]
* [[Deaf education]]
* [[Language acquisition by deaf children]]
* [[Language deprivation experiments]]
== References ==
{{Reflist}}
==External links==
* [https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sR8CNTqGQgE Video: LEAD-K]
[[Category:Deafness]]
[[Category:Language acquisition]]
[[Category:Speech and language pathology]]