View source for Reasons of the Supreme Court of Canada by Justice Binnie

{{short description|none}}
This is a list of all the opinions written by [[Ian Binnie]] during his tenure as puisne justice of the [[Supreme Court of Canada]].
==1998==
{| class="wikitable" width=825
|- bgcolor="#CCCCCC"
! width=25px | !! width=35% | Case name !!  Issue !! width=15% | Co-authored by !! width=15% | Joined by
|-
|bgcolor="red"|
| align=left valign=top|<small>''[[Union of New Brunswick Indians v New Brunswick (Minister of Finance)]]'', [1998] 1 SCR 1161 [https://web.archive.org/web/20070319021112/http://scc.lexum.umontreal.ca/en/1998/1998rcs1-1161/1998rcs1-1161.html]</small>
| valign=top |<!--general area of law and specific issues/constitutional provisions in case--><small>Taxation of aboriginals</small>
| <!--justices that co-authored the opinion--><small> None</small>
| <!--justices that joined the opinion--><small> Gonthier J.</small>
|-
| bgcolor=#EEEEEE colspan=5 valign=top |<!--description of the opinion's position and reasoning, key quotes--><small></small>
|-
|bgcolor="00B2EE"|
| align=left valign=top|<small>''[[Eurig Estate (Re)]]''<br> [1998] 2 SCR 565[https://web.archive.org/web/20070209024158/http://scc.lexum.umontreal.ca/en/1998/1998rcs2-565/1998rcs2-565.html]</small>
| valign=top |<!--general area of law and specific issues/constitutional provisions in case--><small>Constitutional law, estates</small>
| <!--justices that co-authored the opinion--><small> None</small>
| <!--justices that joined the opinion--><small> McLachlin J.</small>
|-
| bgcolor=#EEEEEE colspan=5 valign=top |<!--description of the opinion's position and reasoning, key quotes--><small></small>
|-
|bgcolor="00cd00"|
| align=left valign=top|<small>''[[Consortium Developments (Clearwater) Ltd v Sarnia (City of)]]''<br> [1998] 3 SCR 3 [https://web.archive.org/web/20071104195028/http://scc.lexum.umontreal.ca/en/1998/1998rcs3-3/1998rcs3-3.html]</small>
| valign=top |<!--general area of law and specific issues/constitutional provisions in case--><small>Federalism, municipal law</small>
| <!--justices that co-authored the opinion--><small> None</small>
| <!--justices that joined the opinion--><small> Unanimous</small>
|-
| bgcolor=#EEEEEE colspan=5 valign=top |<!--description of the opinion's position and reasoning, key quotes--><small></small>
|-
|bgcolor="red"|
| align=left valign=top|<small>''[[R v Rose]]''<br> [1998] 3 SCR 262 [https://web.archive.org/web/20080605234510/http://scc.lexum.umontreal.ca/en/1998/1998rcs3-262/1998rcs3-262.html]</small>
| valign=top |<!--general area of law and specific issues/constitutional provisions in case--><small>Charter; right to full answer and defence; jury instruction</small>
| <!--justices that co-authored the opinion--><small> None</small>
| <!--justices that joined the opinion--><small> Lamer CJ and McLachlin, Major JJ</small>
|-
| bgcolor=#EEEEEE colspan=5 valign=top |<!--description of the opinion's position and reasoning, key quotes--><small></small>
|}
==1999==
{| width=100%
|-
|
{| width=100% align=center cellpadding=0 cellspacing=0
|-
! bgcolor=#CCCCCC | Ian Binnie 1999 statistics
|-
|
{| width=100% cellpadding="2" cellspacing="2" border="0"width=25px
|-
|
{| border="1" style="border-collapse:collapse;"
|-
| align=center bgcolor=#00CD00 width=25px |?
|}
| <small>Majority or Plurality</small>
| width=25px |
{| border="1" style="border-collapse:collapse;"
|-
| align=center width=25px bgcolor=#00B2EE |?
|}
| <small>Concurrence</small>
| width=25px |
{| border="1" style="border-collapse:collapse;"
|-
| align=center width=25px bgcolor=white |?
|}
| <small>Other</small>
|-
| width=25px |
{| border="1" style="border-collapse:collapse;"
|-
| align=center width=25px bgcolor=red |?
|}
| <small>Dissent</small>
| width=25px |
{| border="1" style="border-collapse:collapse;"
|-
| align=center width=25px bgcolor=#B23AEE |?
|}
| <small>Concurrence/dissent</small>
| white-space: nowrap |'''Total = '''
| '''?'''
|-
| colspan=2 | <small>Written opinions = ?</small>
| colspan=2 | <small>Oral opinions = ?</small>
| colspan=2 | <small>Unanimous opinions = ?</small>
|-
|}
|}
|}
{| class="wikitable" width=825
|- bgcolor="#CCCCCC"
! width=25px | !! width=35% | Case name !!  Issue !! width=15% | Co-authored by !! width=15% | Joined by
|-
|bgcolor="00cd00"|
| align=left valign=top|<small>''[[Cadbury Schweppes Inc v FBI Foods Ltd]]''<br> [1999] 1 SCR 142 [https://web.archive.org/web/20060721004654/http://scc.lexum.umontreal.ca/en/1999/1999rcs1-142/1999rcs1-142.html]</small>
| valign=top |<!--general area of law and specific issues/constitutional provisions in case--><small>Breach of confidence</small>
| <!--justices that co-authored the opinion--><small> None</small>
| <!--justices that joined the opinion--><small> Unanimous</small>
|-
| bgcolor=#EEEEEE colspan=5 valign=top |<!--description of the opinion's position and reasoning, key quotes--><small></small>
|-
|bgcolor="00B2EE"|
| align=left valign=top|<small>''[[Sail Labrador Ltd v Challenge One (The)]]''<br> [1999] 1 SCR 265 [https://web.archive.org/web/20070325023103/http://scc.lexum.umontreal.ca/en/1999/1999rcs1-265/1999rcs1-265.html]</small>
| valign=top |<!--general area of law and specific issues/constitutional provisions in case--><small>Contract law, substantial performance</small>
| <!--justices that co-authored the opinion--><small> None</small>
| <!--justices that joined the opinion--><small> None</small>
|-
| bgcolor=#EEEEEE colspan=5 valign=top |<!--description of the opinion's position and reasoning, key quotes--><small></small>
|-
|bgcolor="00cd00"|
| align=left valign=top|<small>''[[R v Campbell]]''<br> [1999] 1 SCR 565 [https://web.archive.org/web/20070315153949/http://scc.lexum.umontreal.ca/en/1999/1999rcs1-565/1999rcs1-565.html]</small>
| valign=top |<!--general area of law and specific issues/constitutional provisions in case--><small>Abuse of process; solicitor-client privilege</small>
| <!--justices that co-authored the opinion--><small> None</small>
| <!--justices that joined the opinion--><small> Unanimous</small>
|-
| bgcolor=#EEEEEE colspan=5 valign=top |<!--description of the opinion's position and reasoning, key quotes--><small></small>
|-
|bgcolor="00b2ee"|
| align=left valign=top|<small>''[[R v Beaulac]]''<br> [1999] 1 SCR 768 [https://web.archive.org/web/20070325070040/http://scc.lexum.umontreal.ca/en/1999/1999rcs1-768/1999rcs1-768.html]</small>
| valign=top |<!--general area of law and specific issues/constitutional provisions in case--><small>Language of accused</small>
| <!--justices that co-authored the opinion--><small> Lamer C.J.</small>
| <!--justices that joined the opinion--><small> None</small>
|-
| bgcolor=#EEEEEE colspan=5 valign=top |<!--description of the opinion's position and reasoning, key quotes--><small></small>
|-
|bgcolor="red"|
| align=left valign=top|<small>''[[R v Stone]]''<br>[1999] 2 SCR 290 [http://scc.lexum.umontreal.ca/en/1999/1999rcs1-290/1999rcs2-290.html]</small>
| valign=top |<!--general area of law and specific issues/constitutional provisions in case--><small>Defence of automatism; sentencing</small>
| <!--justices that co-authored the opinion--><small> None</small>
| <!--justices that joined the opinion--><small>Lamer CJ, Iacobucci and Major JJ</small>
|-
| bgcolor=#EEEEEE colspan=5 valign=top |<!--description of the opinion's position and reasoning, key quotes--><small></small>
|-
|bgcolor="00cd00"|
| align=left valign=top|<small>''[[Jacobi v Griffiths]]''<br>[1999] 2 SCR 570 [https://web.archive.org/web/20070325022939/http://scc.lexum.umontreal.ca/en/1999/1999rcs2-570/1999rcs2-570.html]</small>
| valign=top |<!--general area of law and specific issues/constitutional provisions in case--><small>Vicarious liability of employer</small>
| <!--justices that co-authored the opinion--><small> None</small>
| <!--justices that joined the opinion--><small> Cory, Iacobucci and Major JJ</small>
|-
| bgcolor=#EEEEEE colspan=5 valign=top |<!--description of the opinion's position and reasoning, key quotes--><small></small>
|-
|bgcolor="00cd00"|
| align=left valign=top|<small>''[[M & D Farm Ltd v Manitoba Agricultural Credit Corp]]''<br> [1999] 2 SCR 961 [https://web.archive.org/web/20070225105402/http://scc.lexum.umontreal.ca/en/1999/1999rcs2-961/1999rcs2-961.html]</small>
| valign=top |<!--general area of law and specific issues/constitutional provisions in case--><small>Paramountcy doctrine; federalism</small>
| <!--justices that co-authored the opinion--><small> None</small>
| <!--justices that joined the opinion--><small> Unanimous</small>
|-
| bgcolor=#EEEEEE colspan=5 valign=top |<!--description of the opinion's position and reasoning, key quotes--><small></small>
|-
|bgcolor="00cd00"|
| align=left valign=top|<small>''[[Winters v Legal Services Society]]''<br> [1999] 3 SCR 160 [https://web.archive.org/web/20070325070101/http://scc.lexum.umontreal.ca/en/1999/1999rcs3-160/1999rcs3-160.html]</small>
| valign=top |<!--general area of law and specific issues/constitutional provisions in case--><small>Legal services in prison</small>
| <!--justices that co-authored the opinion--><small> None</small>
| <!--justices that joined the opinion--><small> Lamer CJ and L'Heureux-Dubé, Gonthier, McLachlin, Iacobucci, Major and Bastarache JJ</small>
|-
| bgcolor=#EEEEEE colspan=5 valign=top |<!--description of the opinion's position and reasoning, key quotes--><small></small>
|-
|bgcolor="00cd00"|
| align=left valign=top|<small>''[[R v Marshall]]''<br> [1999] 3 SCR 456 [https://web.archive.org/web/20060915100254/http://scc.lexum.umontreal.ca/en/1999/1999rcs3-456/1999rcs3-456.html]</small>
| valign=top |<!--general area of law and specific issues/constitutional provisions in case--><small>aboriginal fishing rights</small>
| <!--justices that co-authored the opinion--><small>None</small>
| <!--justices that joined the opinion--><small> Lamer CJ and L'Heureux-Dubé, Cory and Iacobucci JJ</small>
|-
| bgcolor=#EEEEEE colspan=5 valign=top |<!--description of the opinion's position and reasoning, key quotes--><small></small>
|-
|bgcolor="00cd00"|
| align=left valign=top|<small>''[[Des Champs v Conseil des écoles séparées catholiques de langue française de Prescott-Russell]]''<br> [1999] 3 SCR 281 [https://web.archive.org/web/20070325070221/http://scc.lexum.umontreal.ca/en/1999/1999rcs3-281/1999rcs3-281.html]</small>
| valign=top |<!--general area of law and specific issues/constitutional provisions in case--><small>Public authorities</small>
| <!--justices that co-authored the opinion--><small> None</small>
| <!--justices that joined the opinion--><small> L'Heureux-Dubé, Gonthier, Cory, McLachlin and Iacobucci JJ</small>
|-
| bgcolor=#EEEEEE colspan=5 valign=top |<!--description of the opinion's position and reasoning, key quotes--><small></small>
|-
|bgcolor="00cd00"|
| align=left valign=top|<small>''[[Abouchar v Ottawa-Carleton French-language School Board{{spaced ndash}}Public Sector]]''<br> [1999] 3 SCR 343 [https://web.archive.org/web/20070220101412/http://scc.lexum.umontreal.ca/en/1999/1999rcs3-343/1999rcs3-343.html]</small>
| valign=top |<!--general area of law and specific issues/constitutional provisions in case--><small>Public Authorities</small>
| <!--justices that co-authored the opinion--><small> None</small>
| <!--justices that joined the opinion--><small> L'Heureux-Dubé, Gonthier, Cory, McLachlin and Iacobucci JJ</small>
|-
| bgcolor=#EEEEEE colspan=5 valign=top |<!--description of the opinion's position and reasoning, key quotes--><small></small>
|}
==2000==
{| width=100%
|-
|
{| width=100% align=center cellpadding=0 cellspacing=0
|-
! bgcolor=#CCCCCC | Ian Binnie 2000 statistics
|-
|
{| width=100% cellpadding="2" cellspacing="2" border="0"width=25px
|-
|
{| border="1" style="border-collapse:collapse;"
|-
| align=center bgcolor=#00CD00 width=25px |?
|}
| <small>Majority or Plurality</small>
| width=25px |
{| border="1" style="border-collapse:collapse;"
|-
| align=center width=25px bgcolor=#00B2EE |?
|}
| <small>Concurrence</small>
| width=25px |
{| border="1" style="border-collapse:collapse;"
|-
| align=center width=25px bgcolor=white |?
|}
| <small>Other</small>
|-
| width=25px |
{| border="1" style="border-collapse:collapse;"
|-
| align=center width=25px bgcolor=red |?
|}
| <small>Dissent</small>
| width=25px |
{| border="1" style="border-collapse:collapse;"
|-
| align=center width=25px bgcolor=#B23AEE |?
|}
| <small>Concurrence/dissent</small>
| white-space: nowrap |'''Total = '''
| '''?'''
|-
| colspan=2 | <small>Written opinions = ?</small>
| colspan=2 | <small>Oral opinions = ?</small>
| colspan=2 | <small>Unanimous opinions = ?</small>
|-
|}
|}
|}
{| class="wikitable" width=825
|- bgcolor="#CCCCCC"
! width=25px | !! width=35% | Case name !!  Issue !! width=15% | Co-authored by !! width=15% | Joined by
|-
|bgcolor="00B2EE"|
| align=left valign=top|<small>''[[R v Brooks]]''<br> [2000] 1 SCR 237; 2000 SCC 11 [https://web.archive.org/web/20101110084712/http://scc.lexum.umontreal.ca/en/2000/2000scc11/2000scc11.html]</small>
| valign=top |<!--general area of law and specific issues/constitutional provisions in case--><small>[[informant#Jailhouse informants|jailhouse informant]] evidence</small>
| <!--justices that co-authored the opinion--><small>None</small>
| <!--justices that joined the opinion--><small> None</small>
|-
| bgcolor=#EEEEEE colspan=5 valign=top |<!--description of the opinion's position and reasoning, key quotes--><small></small>
|-
|bgcolor="00cd00"|
| align=left valign=top|<small>''[[Granovsky v Canada (Minister of Employment and Immigration)]]''<br> [2000] 1 SCR 703; 2000 SCC 28 [https://web.archive.org/web/20070318003712/http://scc.lexum.umontreal.ca/en/2000/2000scc28/2000scc28.html]</small>
| valign=top |<!--general area of law and specific issues/constitutional provisions in case--><small>equality rights the disabled</small>
| <!--justices that co-authored the opinion--><small> None</small>
| <!--justices that joined the opinion--><small> Unanimous</small>
|-
| bgcolor=#EEEEEE colspan=5 valign=top |<!--description of the opinion's position and reasoning, key quotes--><small></small>
|-
|bgcolor="00cd00"|
| align=left valign=top|<small>''[[R v Jolivet]]''<br>  [2000] 1 SCR 751; 2000 SCC 29 [https://web.archive.org/web/20101208112127/http://scc.lexum.umontreal.ca/en/2000/2000scc29/2000scc29.html]</small>
| valign=top |<!--general area of law and specific issues/constitutional provisions in case--><small>evidence</small>
| <!--justices that co-authored the opinion--><small> None</small>
| <!--justices that joined the opinion--><small> Unanimous</small>
|-
| bgcolor=#EEEEEE colspan=5 valign=top |<!--description of the opinion's position and reasoning, key quotes--><small></small>
|-
|bgcolor="00cd00"|
| align=left valign=top|<small>''[[FN (Re)]]''<br>  [2000] 1 SCR 880; 2000 SCC 35  [https://web.archive.org/web/20070316232147/http://scc.lexum.umontreal.ca/en/2000/2000scc35/2000scc35.html]</small>
| valign=top |<!--general area of law and specific issues/constitutional provisions in case--><small>non-disclosure of young offenders information</small>
| <!--justices that co-authored the opinion--><small> None</small>
| <!--justices that joined the opinion--><small> Unanimous</small>
|-
| bgcolor=#EEEEEE colspan=5 valign=top |<!--description of the opinion's position and reasoning, key quotes--><small></small>
|-
|bgcolor="red"|
| align=left valign=top|<small>''[[Will-Kare Paving & Contracting Ltd v Canada]]''<br>  [2000] 1 SCR 915; 2000 SCC 36  [https://web.archive.org/web/20070317115821/http://scc.lexum.umontreal.ca/en/2000/2000scc36/2000scc36.html]</small>
| valign=top |<!--general area of law and specific issues/constitutional provisions in case--><small>taxation</small>
| <!--justices that co-authored the opinion--><small> None</small>
| <!--justices that joined the opinion--><small> Gonthier and McLachlin JJ</small>
|-
| bgcolor=#EEEEEE colspan=5 valign=top |<!--description of the opinion's position and reasoning, key quotes--><small></small>
|-
|bgcolor="00cd00"|
| align=left valign=top|<small>''[[R v J-LJ]]''<br> [2000] 2 SCR 600; 2000 SCC 51  [https://web.archive.org/web/20060716152935/http://scc.lexum.umontreal.ca/en/2000/2000scc51/2000scc51.html]</small>
| valign=top |<!--general area of law and specific issues/constitutional provisions in case--><small>Expert evidence; ''[[R. v. Mohan]]'' test</small>
| <!--justices that co-authored the opinion--><small> None</small>
| <!--justices that joined the opinion--><small> Unanimous</small>
|-
| bgcolor=#EEEEEE colspan=5 valign=top |<!--description of the opinion's position and reasoning, key quotes--><small></small>
|-
|bgcolor="00cd00"|
| align=left valign=top|<small>''[[Free World Trust v Électro Santé Inc]]''<br>  [2000] 2 SCR 1024; 2000 SCC 66  [https://web.archive.org/web/20071222075127/http://scc.lexum.umontreal.ca/en/2000/2000scc66/2000scc66.html]</small>
| valign=top |<!--general area of law and specific issues/constitutional provisions in case--><small>Patent infringement</small>
| <!--justices that co-authored the opinion--><small>None</small>
| <!--justices that joined the opinion--><small> Unanimous</small>
|-
| bgcolor=#EEEEEE colspan=5 valign=top |<!--description of the opinion's position and reasoning, key quotes--><small></small>
|-
|bgcolor="00cd00"|
| align=left valign=top|<small>''[[Whirlpool Corp v Camco Inc]]''<br>  [2000] 2 SCR 1067; 2000 SCC 67 [https://web.archive.org/web/20060725202230/http://scc.lexum.umontreal.ca/en/2000/2000scc67/2000scc67.html]</small>
| valign=top |<!--general area of law and specific issues/constitutional provisions in case--><small>Patent construction</small>
| <!--justices that co-authored the opinion--><small> None</small>
| <!--justices that joined the opinion--><small> Unanimous</small>
|-
| bgcolor=#EEEEEE colspan=5 valign=top |<!--description of the opinion's position and reasoning, key quotes--><small></small>
|-
|bgcolor="00cd00"|
| align=left valign=top|<small>''[[Whirlpool Corp v Maytag Corp]]''<br>  [2000] 2 SCR 1116; 2000 SCC 68  [https://web.archive.org/web/20090324041627/http://scc.lexum.umontreal.ca/en/2000/2000scc68/2000scc68.html]</small>
| valign=top |<!--general area of law and specific issues/constitutional provisions in case--><small>Patent construction</small>
| <!--justices that co-authored the opinion--><small> None</small>
| <!--justices that joined the opinion--><small> Unanimous</small>
|-
| bgcolor=#EEEEEE colspan=5 valign=top |<!--description of the opinion's position and reasoning, key quotes--><small></small>
|-
|bgcolor="00cd00"|
| align=left valign=top|<small>''[[Little Sisters Book and Art Emporium v Canada (Minister of Justice)]]''<br> [2000] 2 SCR 1120, 2000 SCC 69 [https://web.archive.org/web/20061229121728/http://scc.lexum.umontreal.ca/en/2000/2000scc69/2000scc69.html]</small>
| valign=top |<!--general area of law and specific issues/constitutional provisions in case--><small>Freedom of expression</small>
| <!--justices that co-authored the opinion--><small> None</small>
| <!--justices that joined the opinion--><small> McLachlin CJ and L'Heureux‑Dubé, Gonthier, Major and Bastarache JJ</small>
|-
| bgcolor=#EEEEEE colspan=5 valign=top |<!--description of the opinion's position and reasoning, key quotes--><small></small>
|}
==2001==
{| width=100%
|-
|
{| width=100% align=center cellpadding=0 cellspacing=0
|-
! bgcolor=#CCCCCC | Ian Binnie 2001 statistics
|-
|
{| width=100% cellpadding="2" cellspacing="2" border="0"width=25px
|-
|
{| border="1" style="border-collapse:collapse;"
|-
| align=center bgcolor=#00CD00 width=25px |?
|}
| <small>Majority or Plurality</small>
| width=25px |
{| border="1" style="border-collapse:collapse;"
|-
| align=center width=25px bgcolor=#00B2EE |?
|}
| <small>Concurrence</small>
| width=25px |
{| border="1" style="border-collapse:collapse;"
|-
| align=center width=25px bgcolor=white |?
|}
| <small>Other</small>
|-
| width=25px |
{| border="1" style="border-collapse:collapse;"
|-
| align=center width=25px bgcolor=red |?
|}
| <small>Dissent</small>
| width=25px |
{| border="1" style="border-collapse:collapse;"
|-
| align=center width=25px bgcolor=#B23AEE |?
|}
| <small>Concurrence/dissent</small>
| white-space: nowrap |'''Total = '''
| '''?'''
|-
| colspan=2 | <small>Written reasons = ?</small>
| colspan=2 | <small>Oral reasons = ?</small>
| colspan=2 | <small>Unanimous reasons = ?</small>
|-
|}
|}
|}
{| class="wikitable" width=825
|- bgcolor="#CCCCCC"
! width=25px | !! width=35% | Case name !!  Issue !! width=15% | Co-authored by !! width=15% | Joined by
|-
|bgcolor="00cd00"|
| align=left valign=top|<small>''[[R v Parrott]]''<br>[2001] 1 SCR 178; 2001 SCC 3 [https://web.archive.org/web/20060726084855/http://scc.lexum.umontreal.ca/en/2001/2001scc3/2001scc3.html]</small>
| valign=top |<!--general area of law and specific issues/constitutional provisions in case--><small> Hearsay exception</small>
| <!--justices that co-authored the opinion--><small> None</small>
| <!--justices that joined the opinion--><small> Major, Bastarache and Arbour JJ</small>
|-
| bgcolor=#EEEEEE colspan=5 valign=top |<!--description of the opinion's position and reasoning, key quotes--><small></small>
|-
|bgcolor="red"|
| align=left valign=top|<small>''[[Ellis-Don Ltd v Ontario (Labour Relations Board)]]''<br> [2001] 1 SCR 221; 2001 SCC 4 [https://web.archive.org/web/20070214063308/http://scc.lexum.umontreal.ca/en/2001/2001scc4/2001scc4.html]</small>
| valign=top |<!--general area of law and specific issues/constitutional provisions in case--><small>natural justice; judicial review</small>
| <!--justices that co-authored the opinion--><small> None</small>
| <!--justices that joined the opinion--><small> Major J</small>
|-
| bgcolor=#EEEEEE colspan=5 valign=top |<!--description of the opinion's position and reasoning, key quotes--><small></small>
|-
|bgcolor="00B2EE"|
| align=left valign=top|<small>''[[Mitchell v MNR]]''<br> [2001] 1 SCR 911; 2001 SCC 33 [https://web.archive.org/web/20070319014425/http://scc.lexum.umontreal.ca/en/2001/2001scc33/2001scc33.html]</small>
| valign=top |<!--general area of law and specific issues/constitutional provisions in case--><small>Aboriginal rights</small>
| <!--justices that co-authored the opinion--><small> None</small>
| <!--justices that joined the opinion--><small> Major J</small>
|-
| bgcolor=#EEEEEE colspan=5 valign=top |<!--description of the opinion's position and reasoning, key quotes--><small></small>
|-
|bgcolor="00B2EE"|
| align=left valign=top|<small>''[[Mount Sinai Hospital Center v Quebec (Minister of Health and Social Services)]]''<br> [2001] 2 SCR 281; 2001 SCC 41 [https://web.archive.org/web/20080419172505/http://scc.lexum.umontreal.ca/en/2001/2001scc41/2001scc41.html]</small>
| valign=top |<!--general area of law and specific issues/constitutional provisions in case--><small>judicial review; ministerial discretion</small>
| <!--justices that co-authored the opinion--><small> None</small>
| <!--justices that joined the opinion--><small> Major J</small>
|-
| bgcolor=#EEEEEE colspan=5 valign=top |<!--description of the opinion's position and reasoning, key quotes--><small></small>
|-
|bgcolor="00cd00"|
| align=left valign=top|<small>''[[Danyluk v Ainsworth Technologies Inc]]''<br> [2001] 2 SCR 460; 2001 SCC 44 [https://web.archive.org/web/20071017155526/http://scc.lexum.umontreal.ca/en/2001/2001scc44/2001scc44.html]</small>
| valign=top |<!--general area of law and specific issues/constitutional provisions in case--><small>employment law; issue estoppel</small>
| <!--justices that co-authored the opinion--><small> None</small>
| <!--justices that joined the opinion--><small> Unanimous</small>
|-
| bgcolor=#EEEEEE colspan=5 valign=top |<!--description of the opinion's position and reasoning, key quotes--><small></small>
|-
|bgcolor="00cd00"|
| align=left valign=top|<small>''[[Saint-Romuald (City of) v Olivier]]''<br> [2001] 2 SCR 898; 2001 SCC 57 [https://web.archive.org/web/20090921005727/http://scc.lexum.umontreal.ca/en/2001/2001scc57/2001scc57.html]</small>
| valign=top |<!--general area of law and specific issues/constitutional provisions in case--><small>Zoning by-laws</small>
| <!--justices that co-authored the opinion--><small> None</small>
| <!--justices that joined the opinion--><small> McLachlin CJ and Major and Arbour JJ</small>
|-
| bgcolor=#EEEEEE colspan=5 valign=top |<!--description of the opinion's position and reasoning, key quotes--><small></small>
|-
|bgcolor="00cd00"|
| align=left valign=top|<small>''[[Naylor Group Inc v Ellis-Don Construction Ltd]]''<br> [2001] 2 SCR 943; 2001 SCC 58 [https://web.archive.org/web/20080714053433/http://scc.lexum.umontreal.ca/en/2001/2001scc58/2001scc58.html]</small>
| valign=top |<!--general area of law and specific issues/constitutional provisions in case--><small>Contracts</small>
| <!--justices that co-authored the opinion--><small> None</small>
| <!--justices that joined the opinion--><small> Unanimous</small>
|-
| bgcolor=#EEEEEE colspan=5 valign=top |<!--description of the opinion's position and reasoning, key quotes--><small></small>
|-
|bgcolor="00cd00"|
| align=left valign=top|<small>''[[Proulx v Quebec (AG)]]''<br> [2001] 3 SCR 9; 2001 SCC 66 [https://web.archive.org/web/20080602130320/http://scc.lexum.umontreal.ca/en/2001/2001scc66/2001scc66.html]</small>
| valign=top |<!--general area of law and specific issues/constitutional provisions in case--><small>Malicious prosecution</small>
| <!--justices that co-authored the opinion--><small> Iacobucci J</small>
| <!--justices that joined the opinion--><small> McLachlin CJ and Major J</small>
|-
| bgcolor=#EEEEEE colspan=5 valign=top |<!--description of the opinion's position and reasoning, key quotes--><small></small>
|-
|bgcolor="00cd00"|
| align=left valign=top|<small>''[[Holt Cargo Systems Inc v ABC Containerline NV (Trustees of)]]''<br> [2001] 3 SCR 907; 2001 SCC 90 [https://web.archive.org/web/20060823163648/http://scc.lexum.umontreal.ca/en/2001/2001scc90/2001scc90.html]</small>
| valign=top |<!--general area of law and specific issues/constitutional provisions in case--><small>Maritime law</small>
| <!--justices that co-authored the opinion--><small> None</small>
| <!--justices that joined the opinion--><small> Unanimous</small>
|-
| bgcolor=#EEEEEE colspan=5 valign=top |<!--description of the opinion's position and reasoning, key quotes--><small></small>
|-
|bgcolor="00cd00"|
| align=left valign=top|<small>''[[Antwerp Bulkcarriers, NV (Re)]]''<br> [2001] 3 SCR 951; 2001 SCC 91 [https://web.archive.org/web/20071104223324/http://scc.lexum.umontreal.ca/en/2001/2001scc91/2001scc91.html]</small>
| valign=top |<!--general area of law and specific issues/constitutional provisions in case--><small>Bankruptcy</small>
| <!--justices that co-authored the opinion--><small> None</small>
| <!--justices that joined the opinion--><small> Unanimous</small>
|-
| bgcolor=#EEEEEE colspan=5 valign=top |<!--description of the opinion's position and reasoning, key quotes--><small></small>
|-
|bgcolor="00cd00"|
| align=left valign=top|<small>''[[Sam Lévy & Associés Inc v Azco Mining Inc]]''<br> [2001] 3 SCR 978; 2001 SCC 92 [https://web.archive.org/web/20090213012015/http://scc.lexum.umontreal.ca/en/2001/2001scc92/2001scc92.html]</small>
| valign=top |<!--general area of law and specific issues/constitutional provisions in case--><small>Bankruptcy</small>
| <!--justices that co-authored the opinion--><small> None</small>
| <!--justices that joined the opinion--><small> Unanimous</small>
|-
| bgcolor=#EEEEEE colspan=5 valign=top |<!--description of the opinion's position and reasoning, key quotes--><small></small>
|}
==2002==
{| width=100%
|-
|
{| width=100% align=center cellpadding=0 cellspacing=0
|-
! bgcolor=#CCCCCC | Ian Binnie 2002 statistics
|-
|
{| width=100% cellpadding="2" cellspacing="2" border="0"width=25px
|-
|
{| border="1" style="border-collapse:collapse;"
|-
| align=center bgcolor=#00CD00 width=25px |?
|}
| <small>Majority or Plurality</small>
| width=25px |
{| border="1" style="border-collapse:collapse;"
|-
| align=center width=25px bgcolor=#00B2EE |?
|}
| <small>Concurrence</small>
| width=25px |
{| border="1" style="border-collapse:collapse;"
|-
| align=center width=25px bgcolor=white |?
|}
| <small>Other</small>
|-
| width=25px |
{| border="1" style="border-collapse:collapse;"
|-
| align=center width=25px bgcolor=red |?
|}
| <small>Dissent</small>
| width=25px |
{| border="1" style="border-collapse:collapse;"
|-
| align=center width=25px bgcolor=#B23AEE |?
|}
| <small>Concurrence/dissent</small>
| white-space: nowrap |'''Total = '''
| '''?'''
|-
| colspan=2 | <small>Written opinions = ?</small>
| colspan=2 | <small>Oral opinions = ?</small>
| colspan=2 | <small>Unanimous opinions = ?</small>
|-
|}
|}
|}
{| class="wikitable" width=825
|- bgcolor="#CCCCCC"
! width=25px | !! width=35% | Case name !!  Issue !! width=15% | Co-authored by !! width=15% | Joined by
|-
|bgcolor="red"|
| align=left valign=top|<small>''[[R v Regan]]''<br> [2002] 1 SCR 297; 2002 SCC 12 [https://web.archive.org/web/20060923043223/http://scc.lexum.umontreal.ca/en/2002/2002scc12/2002scc12.html]</small>
| valign=top |<!--general area of law and specific issues/constitutional provisions in case--><small>abuse of process</small>
| <!--justices that co-authored the opinion--><small> None</small>
| <!--justices that joined the opinion--><small> Iacobucci, Major and Arbour JJ</small>
|-
| bgcolor=#EEEEEE colspan=5 valign=top |<!--description of the opinion's position and reasoning, key quotes--><small></small>
|-
|bgcolor="red"|
| align=left valign=top|<small>''[[Mackin v New Brunswick (Minister of Finance); Rice v New Brunswick]]''<br> [2002] 1 SCR 405; 2002 SCC 13 [https://web.archive.org/web/20060923184942/http://scc.lexum.umontreal.ca/en/2002/2002scc13/2002scc13.html]</small>
| valign=top |<!--general area of law and specific issues/constitutional provisions in case--><small>judicial independence; constitutional remedies</small>
| <!--justices that co-authored the opinion--><small> None</small>
| <!--justices that joined the opinion--><small> LeBel J</small>
|-
| bgcolor=#EEEEEE colspan=5 valign=top |<!--description of the opinion's position and reasoning, key quotes--><small></small>
|-
|bgcolor="00cd00"|
| align=left valign=top|<small>''[[R v Fliss]]''<br> [2002] 1 SCR 535; 2002 SCC 16 [https://web.archive.org/web/20060925060253/http://scc.lexum.umontreal.ca/en/2002/2002scc16/2002scc16.html]</small>
| valign=top |<!--general area of law and specific issues/constitutional provisions in case--><small>Charter, search and seizure</small>
| <!--justices that co-authored the opinion--><small> None</small>
| <!--justices that joined the opinion--><small> Iacobucci, Major and Bastarache JJ</small>
|-
| bgcolor=#EEEEEE colspan=5 valign=top |<!--description of the opinion's position and reasoning, key quotes--><small></small>
|-
|bgcolor="00cd00"|
| align=left valign=top|<small>''[[Whiten v Pilot Insurance Co]]''<br> [2002] 1 SCR 595; 2002 SCC 18 [https://web.archive.org/web/20060923184954/http://scc.lexum.umontreal.ca/en/2002/2002scc18/2002scc18.html]</small>
| valign=top |<!--general area of law and specific issues/constitutional provisions in case--><small>Insurance, damages</small>
| <!--justices that co-authored the opinion--><small> None</small>
| <!--justices that joined the opinion--><small> McLachlin CJ and L'Heureux‑Dubé, Gonthier, Major and Arbour JJ</small>
|-
| bgcolor=#EEEEEE colspan=5 valign=top |<!--description of the opinion's position and reasoning, key quotes--><small></small>
|-
|bgcolor="00cd00"|
| align=left valign=top|<small>''[[Performance Industries Ltd v Sylvan Lake Golf & Tennis Club Ltd]]''<br> [2002] 1 SCR 678; 2002 SCC 19 [https://web.archive.org/web/20060924052017/http://scc.lexum.umontreal.ca/en/2002/2002scc19/2002scc19.html]</small>
| valign=top |<!--general area of law and specific issues/constitutional provisions in case--><small>Equitable remedies in contract</small>
| <!--justices that co-authored the opinion--><small> None</small>
| <!--justices that joined the opinion--><small> McLachlin CJ and L'Heureux‑Dubé, Gonthier, Major and Arbour JJ</small>
|-
| bgcolor=#EEEEEE colspan=5 valign=top |<!--description of the opinion's position and reasoning, key quotes--><small></small>
|-
|bgcolor="00cd00"|
| align=left valign=top|<small>''[[R v Sheppard]]''<br> [2002] 1 SCR 869; 2002 SCC 26 [https://web.archive.org/web/20060924184132/http://scc.lexum.umontreal.ca/en/2002/2002scc26/2002scc26.html]</small>
| valign=top |<!--general area of law and specific issues/constitutional provisions in case--><small>Duty to give reasons in criminal trials</small>
| <!--justices that co-authored the opinion--><small> None</small>
| <!--justices that joined the opinion--><small> Unanimous</small>
|-
| bgcolor=#EEEEEE colspan=5 valign=top |<!--description of the opinion's position and reasoning, key quotes--><small></small>
|-
|bgcolor="00cd00"|
| align=left valign=top|<small>''[[R v Braich]]''<br> [2002] 1 SCR 903; 2002 SCC 27 [https://web.archive.org/web/20060925054436/http://scc.lexum.umontreal.ca/en/2002/2002scc27/2002scc27.html]</small>
| valign=top |<!--general area of law and specific issues/constitutional provisions in case--><small>Duty to give reason for judgment</small>
| <!--justices that co-authored the opinion--><small> None</small>
| <!--justices that joined the opinion--><small> Unanimous</small>
|-
| bgcolor=#EEEEEE colspan=5 valign=top |<!--description of the opinion's position and reasoning, key quotes--><small></small>
|-
|bgcolor="00cd00"|
| align=left valign=top|<small>''[[Théberge v Galerie d'Art du Petit Champlain Inc]]''<br> [2002] 2 SCR 336, 2002 SCC 34 [https://web.archive.org/web/20080430131913/http://scc.lexum.umontreal.ca/en/2002/2002scc34/2002scc34.html]</small>
| valign=top |<!--general area of law and specific issues/constitutional provisions in case--><small>Copyright, fixation</small>
| <!--justices that co-authored the opinion--><small> None</small>
| <!--justices that joined the opinion--><small> McLachlin CJ and Iacobucci and Major JJ</small>
|-
| bgcolor=#EEEEEE colspan=5 valign=top |<!--description of the opinion's position and reasoning, key quotes--><small></small>
|-
|bgcolor="00cd00"|
| align=left valign=top|<small>''[[R v Handy]]''<br> [2002] 2 SCR 908, 2002 SCC 56 [https://web.archive.org/web/20060710102625/http://scc.lexum.umontreal.ca/en/2002/2002scc56/2002scc56.html]</small>
| valign=top |<!--general area of law and specific issues/constitutional provisions in case--><small>Similar fact evidence</small>
| <!--justices that co-authored the opinion--><small> None</small>
| <!--justices that joined the opinion--><small> Unanimous</small>
|-
| bgcolor=#EEEEEE colspan=5 valign=top |<!--description of the opinion's position and reasoning, key quotes--><small></small>
|-
|bgcolor="00cd00"|
| align=left valign=top|<small>''[[R v Shearing]]''<br> [2002] 3 SCR 33; 2002 SCC 58 [https://archive.today/20070620154231/http://scc.lexum.umontreal.ca/en/2002/2002scc58/2002scc58.html]</small>
| valign=top |<!--general area of law and specific issues/constitutional provisions in case--><small>Similar fact evidence</small>
| <!--justices that co-authored the opinion--><small> None</small>
| <!--justices that joined the opinion--><small> McLachlin CJ and Iacobucci, Major, Bastarache, Arbour and LeBel JJ</small>
|-
| bgcolor=#EEEEEE colspan=5 valign=top |<!--description of the opinion's position and reasoning, key quotes--><small></small>
|-
|bgcolor="red"|
| align=left valign=top|<small>''[[Somersall v Friedman]]''<br> [2002] 3 SCR 109; 2002 SCC 59 [https://web.archive.org/web/20090921055044/http://scc.lexum.umontreal.ca/en/2002/2002scc59/2002scc59.html]</small>
| valign=top |<!--general area of law and specific issues/constitutional provisions in case--><small>Insurance, subrogation</small>
| <!--justices that co-authored the opinion--><small> None</small>
| <!--justices that joined the opinion--><small> Major J</small>
|-
| bgcolor=#EEEEEE colspan=5 valign=top |<!--description of the opinion's position and reasoning, key quotes--><small></small>
|-
|bgcolor="00cd00"|
| align=left valign=top|<small>''[[R v Neil]]''<br> [2002] 3 SCR 631; 2002 SCC 70 [https://web.archive.org/web/20060725074401/http://scc.lexum.umontreal.ca/en/2002/2002scc70/2002scc70.html]</small>
| valign=top |<!--general area of law and specific issues/constitutional provisions in case--><small>Conflict of interest, lawyers</small>
| <!--justices that co-authored the opinion--><small> None</small>
| <!--justices that joined the opinion--><small> Unanimous</small>
|-
| bgcolor=#EEEEEE colspan=5 valign=top |<!--description of the opinion's position and reasoning, key quotes--><small></small>
|-
|bgcolor="red"|
| align=left valign=top|<small>''[[Harvard College v Canada (Commissioner of Patents)]]''<br> [2002] 4 SCR 45; 2002 SCC 76 [https://web.archive.org/web/20060710102704/http://scc.lexum.umontreal.ca/en/2002/2002scc76/2002scc76.html]</small>
| valign=top |<!--general area of law and specific issues/constitutional provisions in case--><small>patent of higher lifeforms</small>
| <!--justices that co-authored the opinion--><small> None</small>
| <!--justices that joined the opinion--><small> McLachlin CJ and Major and Arbour JJ</small>
|-
| bgcolor=#EEEEEE colspan=5 valign=top |<!--description of the opinion's position and reasoning, key quotes--><small></small>
|-
|bgcolor="00cd00"|
| align=left valign=top|<small>''[[Apotex Inc v Wellcome Foundation Ltd]]''<br> [2002] 4 SCR 153; 2002 SCC 77 [https://web.archive.org/web/20101231060210/http://scc.lexum.umontreal.ca/en/2002/2002scc77/2002scc77.html]</small>
| valign=top |<!--general area of law and specific issues/constitutional provisions in case--><small>Patent validity</small>
| <!--justices that co-authored the opinion--><small> None</small>
| <!--justices that joined the opinion--><small> Unanimous</small>
|-
| bgcolor=#EEEEEE colspan=5 valign=top |<!--description of the opinion's position and reasoning, key quotes--><small></small>
|-
|bgcolor="00cd00"|
| align=left valign=top|<small>''[[Wewaykum Indian Band v Canada]]''<br> [2002] 4 SCR 245; 2002 SCC 79  [https://web.archive.org/web/20090311012033/http://scc.lexum.umontreal.ca/en/2002/2002scc79/2002scc79.html]</small>
| valign=top |<!--general area of law and specific issues/constitutional provisions in case--><small> Crown’s fiduciary duty to aboriginals</small>
| <!--justices that co-authored the opinion--><small> None</small>
| <!--justices that joined the opinion--><small> Unanimous</small>
|-
| bgcolor=#EEEEEE colspan=5 valign=top |<!--description of the opinion's position and reasoning, key quotes--><small></small>
|}
==2003==
{| width=100%
|-
|
{| width=100% align=center cellpadding=0 cellspacing=0
|-
! bgcolor=#CCCCCC | Ian Binnie 2003 statistics
|-
|
{| width=100% cellpadding="2" cellspacing="2" border="0"width=25px
|-
|
{| border="1" style="border-collapse:collapse;"
|-
| align=center bgcolor=#00CD00 width=25px |?
|}
| <small>Majority or Plurality</small>
| width=25px |
{| border="1" style="border-collapse:collapse;"
|-
| align=center width=25px bgcolor=#00B2EE |?
|}
| <small>Concurrence</small>
| width=25px |
{| border="1" style="border-collapse:collapse;"
|-
| align=center width=25px bgcolor=white |?
|}
| <small>Other</small>
|-
| width=25px |
{| border="1" style="border-collapse:collapse;"
|-
| align=center width=25px bgcolor=red |?
|}
| <small>Dissent</small>
| width=25px |
{| border="1" style="border-collapse:collapse;"
|-
| align=center width=25px bgcolor=#B23AEE |?
|}
| <small>Concurrence/dissent</small>
| white-space: nowrap |'''Total = '''
| '''?'''
|-
| colspan=2 | <small>Written opinions = ?</small>
| colspan=2 | <small>Oral opinions = ?</small>
| colspan=2 | <small>Unanimous opinions = ?</small>
|-
|}
|}
|}
{| class="wikitable" width=825
|- bgcolor="#CCCCCC"
! width=25px | !! width=35% | Case name !!  Issue !! width=15% | Co-authored by !! width=15% | Joined by
|-
|bgcolor="00cd00"|
| align=left valign=top|<small>''[[Goudie v Ottawa (City of)]]''<br> [2003] 1 SCR 141; 2003 SCC 14 [https://web.archive.org/web/20070317115912/http://scc.lexum.umontreal.ca/en/2003/2003scc14/2003scc14.html]</small>
| valign=top |<!--general area of law and specific issues/constitutional provisions in case--><small>Labour relations</small>
| <!--justices that co-authored the opinion--><small> None</small>
| <!--justices that joined the opinion--><small> Unanimous</small>
|-
| bgcolor=#EEEEEE colspan=5 valign=top |<!--description of the opinion's position and reasoning, key quotes--><small></small>
|-
|bgcolor="00cd00"|
| align=left valign=top|<small>''[[Canadian Union of Public Employees v Ontario (Minister of Labour)]]''<br> [2003] 1 SCR 539; 2003 SCC 29 [https://web.archive.org/web/20060913023318/http://scc.lexum.umontreal.ca/en/2003/2003scc29/2003scc29.html]</small>
| valign=top |<!--general area of law and specific issues/constitutional provisions in case--><small>Labour relations, judicial review, appointment of arbitrators</small>
| <!--justices that co-authored the opinion--><small> None</small>
| <!--justices that joined the opinion--><small> Gonthier, Iacobucci, Arbour, LeBel and Deschamps JJ</small>
|-
| bgcolor=#EEEEEE colspan=5 valign=top |<!--description of the opinion's position and reasoning, key quotes--><small></small>
|-
|bgcolor="00cd00"|
| align=left valign=top|<small>''[[R v Owen]]''<br> [2003] 1 SCR 779; 2003 SCC 33 [https://web.archive.org/web/20060721001244/http://scc.lexum.umontreal.ca/en/2003/2003scc33/2003scc33.html]</small>
| valign=top |<!--general area of law and specific issues/constitutional provisions in case--><small>Mental disorder</small>
| <!--justices that co-authored the opinion--><small> None</small>
| <!--justices that joined the opinion--><small> McLachlin CJ and Gonthier, Iacobucci, Major, Bastarache, LeBel and Deschamps JJ</small>
|-
| bgcolor=#EEEEEE colspan=5 valign=top |<!--description of the opinion's position and reasoning, key quotes--><small></small>
|-
|bgcolor="00cd00"|
| align=left valign=top|<small>''[[R v Asante-Mensah]]''<br> [2003] 2 SCR 3; 2003 SCC 38 [https://web.archive.org/web/20060726084958/http://scc.lexum.umontreal.ca/en/2003/2003scc38/2003scc38.html]</small>
| valign=top |<!--general area of law and specific issues/constitutional provisions in case--><small> citizen's arrest; use of force</small>
| <!--justices that co-authored the opinion--><small> None</small>
| <!--justices that joined the opinion--><small> Unanimous</small>
|-
| bgcolor=#EEEEEE colspan=5 valign=top |<!--description of the opinion's position and reasoning, key quotes--><small></small>
|-
|bgcolor="00cd00"|
| align=left valign=top|<small>''[[Unifund Assurance Co v Insurance Corp of British Columbia]]''<br> [2003] 2 SCR 63; 2003 SCC 40 [https://web.archive.org/web/20060831164300/http://scc.lexum.umontreal.ca/en/2003/2003scc40/2003scc40.html]</small>
| valign=top |<!--general area of law and specific issues/constitutional provisions in case--><small>Interprovincial jurisdiction</small>
| <!--justices that co-authored the opinion--><small> None</small>
| <!--justices that joined the opinion--><small> McLachlin CJ and Iacobucci and LeBel JJ</small>
|-
| bgcolor=#EEEEEE colspan=5 valign=top |<!--description of the opinion's position and reasoning, key quotes--><small></small>
|-
|bgcolor="00cd00"|
| align=left valign=top|<small>''[[R v Williams]]''<br> [2003] 2 SCR 134; 2003 SCC 41 [https://web.archive.org/web/20080220215147/http://scc.lexum.umontreal.ca/en/2003/2003scc41/2003scc41.html]</small>
| valign=top |<!--general area of law and specific issues/constitutional provisions in case--><small>Assault, Non‑disclosure of HIV status</small>
| <!--justices that co-authored the opinion--><small> None</small>
| <!--justices that joined the opinion--><small> Unanimous</small>
|-
| bgcolor=#EEEEEE colspan=5 valign=top |<!--description of the opinion's position and reasoning, key quotes--><small></small>
|-
|bgcolor="red"|
| align=left valign=top|<small>''[[Beals v Saldanha]]''<br> [2003] 3 SCR 416; 2003 SCC 72 [https://web.archive.org/web/20070715111527/http://scc.lexum.umontreal.ca/en/2003/2003scc72/2003scc72.html]</small>
| valign=top |<!--general area of law and specific issues/constitutional provisions in case--><small>conflict of laws; enforcement of judgment</small>
| <!--justices that co-authored the opinion--><small> None</small>
| <!--justices that joined the opinion--><small> Iacobucci J</small>
|-
| bgcolor=#EEEEEE colspan=5 valign=top |<!--description of the opinion's position and reasoning, key quotes--><small></small>
|-
|bgcolor="00cd00"|
| align=left valign=top|<small>''[[R v Wu]]''<br> [2003] 3 SCR 530; 2003 SCC 73 [https://web.archive.org/web/20071117111951/http://scc.lexum.umontreal.ca/en/2003/2003scc73/2003scc73.html]</small>
| valign=top |<!--general area of law and specific issues/constitutional provisions in case--><small>Conditional sentencing</small>
| <!--justices that co-authored the opinion--><small> None</small>
| <!--justices that joined the opinion--><small> McLachlin CJ and Gonthier, Iacobucci, Major, Bastarache, Arbour and LeBel JJ</small>
|-
| bgcolor=#EEEEEE colspan=5 valign=top |<!--description of the opinion's position and reasoning, key quotes--><small></small>
|-
|bgcolor="00cd00"|
| align=left valign=top|<small>''[[R v Malmo-Levine; R v Caine]]''<br> [2003] 3 SCR 571; 2003 SCC 74 [https://web.archive.org/web/20060721001331/http://scc.lexum.umontreal.ca/en/2003/2003scc74/2003scc74.html]</small>
| valign=top |<!--general area of law and specific issues/constitutional provisions in case--><small>Charter of Rights, division of powers, prohibition of marijuana</small>
| <!--justices that co-authored the opinion--><small> Gonthier J</small>
| <!--justices that joined the opinion--><small> McLachlin CJ and Iacobucci, Major and Bastarache JJ</small>
|-
| bgcolor=#EEEEEE colspan=5 valign=top |<!--description of the opinion's position and reasoning, key quotes--><small></small>
|-
|bgcolor="00cd00"|
| align=left valign=top|<small>''[[R v Clay]]''<br> [2003] 3 SCR 735; 2003 SCC 75 [https://web.archive.org/web/20060918232320/http://scc.lexum.umontreal.ca/en/2003/2003scc75/2003scc75.html]</small>
| valign=top |<!--general area of law and specific issues/constitutional provisions in case--><small>Charter, section 7</small>
| <!--justices that co-authored the opinion--><small> Gonthier J</small>
| <!--justices that joined the opinion--><small> McLachlin CJ and Iacobucci, Major and Bastarache JJ</small>
|-
| bgcolor=#EEEEEE colspan=5 valign=top |<!--description of the opinion's position and reasoning, key quotes--><small></small>
|}
==2004==
{| width=100%
|-
|
{| width=100% align=center cellpadding=0 cellspacing=0
|-
! bgcolor=#CCCCCC | Ian Binnie 2004 statistics
|-
|
{| width=100% cellpadding="2" cellspacing="2" border="0"width=25px
|-
|
{| border="1" style="border-collapse:collapse;"
|-
| align=center bgcolor=#00CD00 width=25px |?
|}
| <small>Majority or Plurality</small>
| width=25px |
{| border="1" style="border-collapse:collapse;"
|-
| align=center width=25px bgcolor=#00B2EE |?
|}
| <small>Concurrence</small>
| width=25px |
{| border="1" style="border-collapse:collapse;"
|-
| align=center width=25px bgcolor=white |?
|}
| <small>Other</small>
|-
| width=25px |
{| border="1" style="border-collapse:collapse;"
|-
| align=center width=25px bgcolor=red |?
|}
| <small>Dissent</small>
| width=25px |
{| border="1" style="border-collapse:collapse;"
|-
| align=center width=25px bgcolor=#B23AEE |?
|}
| <small>Concurrence/dissent</small>
| white-space: nowrap |'''Total = '''
| '''?'''
|-
| colspan=2 | <small>Written opinions = ?</small>
| colspan=2 | <small>Oral opinions = ?</small>
| colspan=2 | <small>Unanimous opinions = ?</small>
|-
|}
|}
|}
{| class="wikitable" width=825
|- bgcolor="#CCCCCC"
! width=25px | !! width=35% | Case name !!  Issue !! width=15% | Co-authored by !! width=15% | Joined by
|-
|bgcolor="B23AEE"|
| align=left valign=top|<small>''[[Canadian Foundation for Children, Youth and the Law v Canada (AG)]]''<br> [2004] 1 SCR 76; 2004 SCC 4 [https://web.archive.org/web/20060710021317/http://scc.lexum.umontreal.ca/en/2004/2004scc4/2004scc4.html]</small>
| valign=top |<!--general area of law and specific issues/constitutional provisions in case--><small>Charter, spanking</small>
| <!--justices that co-authored the opinion--><small> None</small>
| <!--justices that joined the opinion--><small> None</small>
|-
| bgcolor=#EEEEEE colspan=5 valign=top |<!--description of the opinion's position and reasoning, key quotes--><small></small>
|-
|bgcolor="00cd00"|
| align=left valign=top|<small>''[[R v Smith]]''<br> [2004] 1 SCR 385; 2004 SCC 14 [https://web.archive.org/web/20071013171339/http://scc.lexum.umontreal.ca/en/2004/2004scc14/2004scc14.html]</small>
| valign=top |<!--general area of law and specific issues/constitutional provisions in case--><small>Death of appellant</small>
| <!--justices that co-authored the opinion--><small> None</small>
| <!--justices that joined the opinion--><small> Unanimous</small>
|-
| bgcolor=#EEEEEE colspan=5 valign=top |<!--description of the opinion's position and reasoning, key quotes--><small></small>
|-
|bgcolor="00cd00"|
| align=left valign=top|<small>''[[Penetanguishene Mental Health Centre v Ontario (AG)]]''<br> [2004] 1 SCR 498; 2004 SCC 20 [https://web.archive.org/web/20070318221455/http://scc.lexum.umontreal.ca/en/2004/2004scc20/2004scc20.html]</small>
| valign=top |<!--general area of law and specific issues/constitutional provisions in case--><small>Mental disorder defence</small>
| <!--justices that co-authored the opinion--><small> None</small>
| <!--justices that joined the opinion--><small> Unanimous</small>
|-
| bgcolor=#EEEEEE colspan=5 valign=top |<!--description of the opinion's position and reasoning, key quotes--><small></small>
|-
|bgcolor="00cd00"|
| align=left valign=top|<small>''[[Pinet v St Thomas Psychiatric Hospital]]''<br> [2004] 1 SCR 528; 2004 SCC 21 [https://web.archive.org/web/20070318221644/http://scc.lexum.umontreal.ca/en/2004/2004scc21/2004scc21.html]</small>
| valign=top |<!--general area of law and specific issues/constitutional provisions in case--><small>Mental disorder defence</small>
| <!--justices that co-authored the opinion--><small> None</small>
| <!--justices that joined the opinion--><small> Unanimous</small>
|-
| bgcolor=#EEEEEE colspan=5 valign=top |<!--description of the opinion's position and reasoning, key quotes--><small></small>
|-
|bgcolor="00cd00"|
| align=left valign=top|<small>''[[British Columbia v Canadian Forest Products Ltd]]''<br> [2004] 2 SCR 74; 2004 SCC 38 [https://web.archive.org/web/20071013171538/http://scc.lexum.umontreal.ca/en/2004/2004scc38/2004scc38.html]</small>
| valign=top |<!--general area of law and specific issues/constitutional provisions in case--><small>Damage to public lands</small>
| <!--justices that co-authored the opinion--><small> None</small>
| <!--justices that joined the opinion--><small> McLachlin CJ and Iacobucci, Major, Arbour and Deschamps JJ</small>
|-
| bgcolor=#EEEEEE colspan=5 valign=top |<!--description of the opinion's position and reasoning, key quotes--><small></small>
|-
|bgcolor="00b2ee"|
| align=left valign=top|<small>''[[Quebec (AG) v Quebec (Human Rights Tribunal)]]''<br> [2004] 2 SCR 223; 2004 SCC 40 [https://web.archive.org/web/20070319014953/http://scc.lexum.umontreal.ca/en/2004/2004scc40/2004scc40.html]</small>
| valign=top |<!--general area of law and specific issues/constitutional provisions in case--><small>Jurisdiction of human rights tribunals</small>
| <!--justices that co-authored the opinion--><small> None</small>
| <!--justices that joined the opinion--><small> Fish J</small>
|-
| bgcolor=#EEEEEE colspan=5 valign=top |<!--description of the opinion's position and reasoning, key quotes--><small></small>
|-
|bgcolor="red"|
| align=left valign=top|<small>''[[Application under s 83.28 of the Criminal Code (Re)]]''<br> [2004] 2 SCR 248; 2004 SCC 42 [https://web.archive.org/web/20071013171606/http://scc.lexum.umontreal.ca/en/2004/2004scc42/2004scc42.html]</small>
| valign=top |<!--general area of law and specific issues/constitutional provisions in case--><small> Charter, terrorism</small>
| <!--justices that co-authored the opinion--><small> None</small>
| <!--justices that joined the opinion--><small> None</small>
|-
| bgcolor=#EEEEEE colspan=5 valign=top |<!--description of the opinion's position and reasoning, key quotes--><small></small>
|-
|bgcolor="red"|
| align=left valign=top|<small>''[[R v Kerr]]''<br>[2004] 2 SCR 371; 2004 SCC 44 [https://web.archive.org/web/20071013171617/http://scc.lexum.umontreal.ca/en/2004/2004scc44/2004scc44.html]</small>
| valign=top |<!--general area of law and specific issues/constitutional provisions in case--><small>Weapons offences</small>
| <!--justices that co-authored the opinion--><small> None</small>
| <!--justices that joined the opinion--><small> None</small>
|-
| bgcolor=#EEEEEE colspan=5 valign=top |<!--description of the opinion's position and reasoning, key quotes--><small></small>
|-
|bgcolor="00cd00"|
| align=left valign=top|<small>''[[Society of Composers, Authors and Music Publishers of Canada v Canadian Assn of Internet Providers]]''<br>[2004] 2 SCR 427; 2004 SCC 45 [https://web.archive.org/web/20071013171621/http://scc.lexum.umontreal.ca/en/2004/2004scc45/2004scc45.html]</small>
| valign=top |<!--general area of law and specific issues/constitutional provisions in case--><small>Copyright infringement</small>
| <!--justices that co-authored the opinion--><small> None</small>
| <!--justices that joined the opinion--><small> McLachlin CJ and Iacobucci, Major, Bastarache, Arbour, Deschamps and Fish JJ</small>
|-
| bgcolor=#EEEEEE colspan=5 valign=top |<!--description of the opinion's position and reasoning, key quotes--><small></small>
|-
|bgcolor="red"|
| align=left valign=top|<small>''[[Syndicat Northcrest v Amselem]]''<br> [2004] 2 SCR 551; 2004 SCC 47 [https://web.archive.org/web/20071013171625/http://scc.lexum.umontreal.ca/en/2004/2004scc47/2004scc47.html]</small>
| valign=top |<!--general area of law and specific issues/constitutional provisions in case--><small>Freedom of religion</small>
| <!--justices that co-authored the opinion--><small> None</small>
| <!--justices that joined the opinion--><small> None</small>
|-
| bgcolor=#EEEEEE colspan=5 valign=top |<!--description of the opinion's position and reasoning, key quotes--><small></small>
|-
|bgcolor="red"|
| align=left valign=top|<small>''[[Gilles E Néron Communication Marketing Inc v Chambre des notaires du Québec]]''<br> [2004] 3 SCR 95; 2004 SCC 53 [https://web.archive.org/web/20070311042401/http://scc.lexum.umontreal.ca/en/2004/2004scc53/2004scc53.html]</small>
| valign=top |<!--general area of law and specific issues/constitutional provisions in case--><small>Defamation, television broadcasts</small>
| <!--justices that co-authored the opinion--><small> None</small>
| <!--justices that joined the opinion--><small> None</small>
|-
| bgcolor=#EEEEEE colspan=5 valign=top |<!--description of the opinion's position and reasoning, key quotes--><small></small>
|-
|bgcolor="00cd00"|
| align=left valign=top|<small>''[[Hodge v Canada (Minister of Human Resources Development)]]''<br> [2004] 3 SCR 357; 2004 SCC 65 [https://web.archive.org/web/20060710102958/http://scc.lexum.umontreal.ca/en/2004/2004scc65/2004scc65.html]</small>
| valign=top |<!--general area of law and specific issues/constitutional provisions in case--><small>Charter equality rights, marriage</small>
| <!--justices that co-authored the opinion--><small> None</small>
| <!--justices that joined the opinion--><small> Unanimous</small>
|-
| bgcolor=#EEEEEE colspan=5 valign=top |<!--description of the opinion's position and reasoning, key quotes--><small></small>
|-
|bgcolor="00cd00"|
| align=left valign=top|<small>''[[Newfoundland (Treasury Board) v Newfoundland and Labrador Association of Public and Private Employees]]''<br> [2004] 3 SCR 381; 2004 SCC 66 [https://web.archive.org/web/20071013010116/http://scc.lexum.umontreal.ca/en/2004/2004scc66/2004scc66.html]</small>
| valign=top |<!--general area of law and specific issues/constitutional provisions in case--><small>Charter equality rights, gender, reasonable limits</small>
| <!--justices that co-authored the opinion--><small> None</small>
| <!--justices that joined the opinion--><small> Unanimous</small>
|-
| bgcolor=#EEEEEE colspan=5 valign=top |<!--description of the opinion's position and reasoning, key quotes--><small></small>
|-
|bgcolor="00cd00"|
| align=left valign=top|<small>''[[R v Tessling]]''<br> [2004] 3 SCR 432; 2004 SCC 67 [https://web.archive.org/web/20060710023845/http://scc.lexum.umontreal.ca/en/2004/2004scc67/2004scc67.html]</small>
| valign=top |<!--general area of law and specific issues/constitutional provisions in case--><small>Charter, search and seizure</small>
| <!--justices that co-authored the opinion--><small> None</small>
| <!--justices that joined the opinion--><small> Unanimous</small>
|-
| bgcolor=#EEEEEE colspan=5 valign=top |<!--description of the opinion's position and reasoning, key quotes--><small></small>
|-
|bgcolor="00cd00"|
| align=left valign=top|<small>''[[Pacific National Investments Ltd v Victoria (City of)]]''<br> [2004] 3 SCR 575; 2004 SCC 75 [https://web.archive.org/web/20071013171841/http://scc.lexum.umontreal.ca/en/2004/2004scc75/2004scc75.html]</small>
| valign=top |<!--general area of law and specific issues/constitutional provisions in case--><small>Zoning, unjust enrichment</small>
| <!--justices that co-authored the opinion--><small> None</small>
| <!--justices that joined the opinion--><small> Unanimous</small>
|-
| bgcolor=#EEEEEE colspan=5 valign=top |<!--description of the opinion's position and reasoning, key quotes--><small></small>
|-
|bgcolor="00cd00"|
| align=left valign=top|<small>''[[R v Lohrer]]''<br> [2004] 3 SCR 732; 2004 SCC 80 [https://web.archive.org/web/20071013171905/http://scc.lexum.umontreal.ca/en/2004/2004scc80/2004scc80.html]</small>
| valign=top |<!--general area of law and specific issues/constitutional provisions in case--><small>Misapprehension of evidence</small>
| <!--justices that co-authored the opinion--><small> None</small>
| <!--justices that joined the opinion--><small> Unanimous</small>
|-
| bgcolor=#EEEEEE colspan=5 valign=top |<!--description of the opinion's position and reasoning, key quotes--><small></small>
|}
==2005==
{| width=100%
|-
|
{| width=100% align=center cellpadding=0 cellspacing=0
|-
! bgcolor=#CCCCCC | Ian Binnie 2005 statistics
|-
|
{| width=100% cellpadding="2" cellspacing="2" border="0"width=25px
|-
|
{| border="1" style="border-collapse:collapse;"
|-
| align=center bgcolor=#00CD00 width=25px |?
|}
| <small>Majority or Plurality</small>
| width=25px |
{| border="1" style="border-collapse:collapse;"
|-
| align=center width=25px bgcolor=#00B2EE |?
|}
| <small>Concurrence</small>
| width=25px |
{| border="1" style="border-collapse:collapse;"
|-
| align=center width=25px bgcolor=white |?
|}
| <small>Other</small>
|-
| width=25px |
{| border="1" style="border-collapse:collapse;"
|-
| align=center width=25px bgcolor=red |?
|}
| <small>Dissent</small>
| width=25px |
{| border="1" style="border-collapse:collapse;"
|-
| align=center width=25px bgcolor=#B23AEE |?
|}
| <small>Concurrence/dissent</small>
| white-space: nowrap |'''Total = '''
| '''?'''
|-
| colspan=2 | <small>Written opinions = ?</small>
| colspan=2 | <small>Oral opinions = ?</small>
| colspan=2 | <small>Unanimous opinions = ?</small>
|-
|}
|}
|}
{| class="wikitable" width=825
|- bgcolor="#CCCCCC"
! width=25px | !! width=35% | Case name !!  Issue !! width=15% | Co-authored by !! width=15% | Joined by
|-
|bgcolor="00cd00"|
| align=left valign=top|<small>''[[Vaughan v Canada]]''<br> [2005] 1 SCR 146; 2005 SCC 11 [https://web.archive.org/web/20070317120032/http://scc.lexum.umontreal.ca/en/2005/2005scc11/2005scc11.html]</small>
| valign=top |<!--general area of law and specific issues/constitutional provisions in case--><small>Labour law; early retirement</small>
| <!--justices that co-authored the opinion--><small> None</small>
| <!--justices that joined the opinion--><small> Major, LeBel, Deschamps, Fish, Abella and Charron JJ</small>
|-
| bgcolor=#EEEEEE colspan=5 valign=top |<!--description of the opinion's position and reasoning, key quotes--><small></small>
|-
|bgcolor="00cd00"|
| align=left valign=top|<small>''[[Bristol-Myers Squibb Co v Canada (AG)]]''<br> [2005] 1 SCR 533; 2005 SCC 26 [https://web.archive.org/web/20070319015054/http://scc.lexum.umontreal.ca/en/2005/2005scc26/2005scc26.html]</small>
| valign=top |<!--general area of law and specific issues/constitutional provisions in case--><small>Patents, Notice of compliance</small>
| <!--justices that co-authored the opinion--><small>None</small>
| <!--justices that joined the opinion--><small> McLachlin CJ and LeBel, Deschamps, Fish and Abella JJ</small>
|-
| bgcolor=#EEEEEE colspan=5 valign=top |<!--description of the opinion's position and reasoning, key quotes--><small></small>
|-
|bgcolor="00cd00"|
| align=left valign=top|<small>''[[Canada (House of Commons) v Vaid]]''<br> [2005] 1 SCR 667, 2005 SCC 30 [https://web.archive.org/web/20070319015115/http://scc.lexum.umontreal.ca/en/2005/2005scc30/2005scc30.html]</small>
| valign=top |<!--general area of law and specific issues/constitutional provisions in case--><small>Parliamentary privilege</small>
| <!--justices that co-authored the opinion--><small> None</small>
| <!--justices that joined the opinion--><small> Unanimous</small>
|-
| bgcolor=#EEEEEE colspan=5 valign=top |<!--description of the opinion's position and reasoning, key quotes--><small></small>
|-
|bgcolor="red"|
| align=left valign=top|<small>''[[Chaoulli v Quebec (AG)]]''<br> [2005] 1 SCR 791; 2005 SCC 35 [https://web.archive.org/web/20110202122636/http://scc.lexum.umontreal.ca/en/2005/2005scc35/2005scc35.html]</small>
| valign=top |<!--general area of law and specific issues/constitutional provisions in case--><small>Charter, section 7; prohibition on medical insurance</small>
| <!--justices that co-authored the opinion--><small> LeBel J</small>
| <!--justices that joined the opinion--><small> Fish J</small>
|-
| bgcolor=#EEEEEE colspan=5 valign=top |<!--description of the opinion's position and reasoning, key quotes--><small></small>
|-
|bgcolor="00cd00"|
| align=left valign=top|<small>''[[Mugesera v Canada (Minister of Citizenship and Immigration)]]''<br> [2005] 2 SCR 100; 2005 SCC 40 [https://web.archive.org/web/20070311042216/http://scc.lexum.umontreal.ca/en/2005/2005scc40/2005scc40.html]</small>
| valign=top |<!--general area of law and specific issues/constitutional provisions in case--><small>Administrative law; crimes against humanity; deportation orders</small>
| <!--justices that co-authored the opinion--><small> Unanimous</small>
| <!--justices that joined the opinion--><small> None</small>
|-
| bgcolor=#EEEEEE colspan=5 valign=top |<!--description of the opinion's position and reasoning, key quotes--><small></small>
|-
|bgcolor="00cd00"|
| align=left valign=top|<small>''[[R v GR]]''<br> [2005] 2 SCR 371; 2005 SCC 45 [https://web.archive.org/web/20070312215358/http://scc.lexum.umontreal.ca/en/2005/2005scc45/2005scc45.html]</small>
| valign=top |<!--general area of law and specific issues/constitutional provisions in case--><small>Incest</small>
| <!--justices that co-authored the opinion--><small> None</small>
| <!--justices that joined the opinion--><small> McLachlin CJ and Major, Fish and Charron JJ</small>
|-
| bgcolor=#EEEEEE colspan=5 valign=top |<!--description of the opinion's position and reasoning, key quotes--><small></small>
|-
|bgcolor="00cd00"|
| align=left valign=top|<small>''[[EB v Order of the Oblates of Mary Immaculate in the Province of British Columbia]]''<br> [2005] 3 SCR 45; 2005 SCC 60 [https://web.archive.org/web/20070312215408/http://scc.lexum.umontreal.ca/en/2005/2005scc60/2005scc60.html]</small>
| valign=top |<!--general area of law and specific issues/constitutional provisions in case--><small>Vicarious liability</small>
| <!--justices that co-authored the opinion--><small> None</small>
| <!--justices that joined the opinion--><small> McLachlin CJ and Major, Bastarache, LeBel, Deschamps, Fish and Charron JJ</small>
|-
| bgcolor=#EEEEEE colspan=5 valign=top |<!--description of the opinion's position and reasoning, key quotes--><small></small>
|-
|bgcolor="red"|
| align=left valign=top|<small>''[[Montréal (City of) v 2952-1366 Québec Inc]]''<br> [2005] 3 SCR 141; 2005 SCC 62 [https://web.archive.org/web/20071017120454/http://scc.lexum.umontreal.ca/en/2005/2005scc62/2005scc62.html]</small>
| valign=top |<!--general area of law and specific issues/constitutional provisions in case--><small>Freedom of expression; public property</small>
| <!--justices that co-authored the opinion--><small> None</small>
| <!--justices that joined the opinion--><small> None</small>
|-
| bgcolor=#EEEEEE colspan=5 valign=top |<!--description of the opinion's position and reasoning, key quotes--><small></small>
|-
|bgcolor="00cd00"|
| align=left valign=top|<small>''[[Mikisew Cree First Nation v Canada (Minister of Canadian Heritage)]]''<br> [2005] 3 SCR 388; 2005 SCC 69 [https://web.archive.org/web/20070606024606/http://scc.lexum.umontreal.ca/en/2005/2005scc69/2005scc69.html]</small>
| valign=top |<!--general area of law and specific issues/constitutional provisions in case--><small>Aboriginal treaty rights; duty to consult</small>
| <!--justices that co-authored the opinion--><small> None</small>
| <!--justices that joined the opinion--><small> Unanimous</small>
|-
| bgcolor=#EEEEEE colspan=5 valign=top |<!--description of the opinion's position and reasoning, key quotes--><small></small>
|-
|bgcolor="00cd00"|
| align=left valign=top|<small>''[[Merk v International Association of Bridge, Structural, Ornamental and Reinforcing Iron Workers, Local 771]]''<br> [2005] 3 SCR 425; 2005 SCC 70 [https://web.archive.org/web/20071121014106/http://scc.lexum.umontreal.ca/en/2005/2005scc70/2005scc70.html]</small>
| valign=top |<!--general area of law and specific issues/constitutional provisions in case--><small>Whistleblowers</small>
| <!--justices that co-authored the opinion--><small> None</small>
| <!--justices that joined the opinion--><small> McLachlin CJ and Major, LeBel, Abella and Charron JJ</small>
|-
| bgcolor=#EEEEEE colspan=5 valign=top |<!--description of the opinion's position and reasoning, key quotes--><small></small>
|-
|bgcolor="00cd00"|
| align=left valign=top|<small>''[[R v Spence]]''<br> [2005] 3 SCR 458; 2005 SCC 71 [https://web.archive.org/web/20071120112915/http://scc.lexum.umontreal.ca/en/2005/2005scc71/2005scc71.html]</small>
| valign=top |<!--general area of law and specific issues/constitutional provisions in case--><small>Jury selection; judicial notice</small>
| <!--justices that co-authored the opinion--><small> None</small>
| <!--justices that joined the opinion--><small> Unanimous</small>
|-
| bgcolor=#EEEEEE colspan=5 valign=top |<!--description of the opinion's position and reasoning, key quotes--><small></small>
|-
|bgcolor="00cd00"|
| align=left valign=top|<small>''[[R v Henry]]''<br> [2005] 3 SCR 609; 2005 SCC 76 [https://web.archive.org/web/20071120112924/http://scc.lexum.umontreal.ca/en/2005/2005scc76/2005scc76.html]</small>
| valign=top |<!--general area of law and specific issues/constitutional provisions in case--><small>Right against self-incrimination; obiter dicta</small>
| <!--justices that co-authored the opinion--><small> None</small>
| <!--justices that joined the opinion--><small> Unanimous</small>
|-
| bgcolor=#EEEEEE colspan=5 valign=top |<!--description of the opinion's position and reasoning, key quotes--><small></small>
|}
==2006==
{| width=100%
|-
|
{| width=100% align=center cellpadding=0 cellspacing=0
|-
! bgcolor=#CCCCCC | Ian Binnie 2006 statistics
|-
|
{| width=100% cellpadding="2" cellspacing="2" border="0"width=25px
|-
|
{| border="1" style="border-collapse:collapse;"
|-
| align=center bgcolor=#00CD00 width=25px |7
|}
| <small>Majority or Plurality</small>
| width=25px |
{| border="1" style="border-collapse:collapse;"
|-
| align=center width=25px bgcolor=#00B2EE |1
|}
| <small>Concurrence</small>
| width=25px |
{| border="1" style="border-collapse:collapse;"
|-
| align=center width=25px bgcolor=white |0
|}
| <small>Other</small>
|-
| width=25px |
{| border="1" style="border-collapse:collapse;"
|-
| align=center width=25px bgcolor=red |3
|}
| <small>Dissent</small>
| width=25px |
{| border="1" style="border-collapse:collapse;"
|-
| align=center width=25px bgcolor=#B23AEE |0
|}
| <small>Concurrence/dissent</small>
| white-space: nowrap |'''Total = '''
| '''11'''
|-
| colspan=2 | <small>Written reasons= ?</small>
| colspan=2 | <small>Oral reasons= ?</small>
| colspan=2 | <small>Unanimous reasons= ?</small>
|-
|}
|}
|}
{| class="wikitable" width=825
|- bgcolor="#CCCCCC"
! width=25px | !! width=35% | Case name !!  Issue !! width=15% | Co-authored by !! width=15% | Joined by
|-
|bgcolor="#00cd00"|
| align=left valign=top|<small>''[[Young v Bella]]''<br> [2006] 1 SCR 108; 2006 SCC 3 [https://web.archive.org/web/20060912123340/http://scc.lexum.umontreal.ca/en/2006/2006scc3/2006scc3.html]</small>
| valign=top |<!--general area of law and specific issues/constitutional provisions in case--><small>Duty of care</small>
| <!--justices that co-authored the opinion--><small> McLachlin CJ</small>
| <!--justices that joined the opinion--><small> Unanimous</small>
|-
| bgcolor=#EEEEEE colspan=5 valign=top |<!--description of the opinion's position and reasoning, key quotes--><small></small>
|-
|bgcolor="red"|
| align=left valign=top|<small>''[[ATCO Gas & Pipelines Ltd v Alberta (Energy & Utilities Board)]]''<br> [2006] 1 SCR 140; 2006 SCC 4 [https://web.archive.org/web/20060913023425/http://scc.lexum.umontreal.ca/en/2006/2006scc4/2006scc4.html]</small>
| valign=top |<!--general area of law and specific issues/constitutional provisions in case--><small>Judicial review</small>
| <!--justices that co-authored the opinion--><small> None</small>
| <!--justices that joined the opinion--><small> McLachlin CJ and Fish J</small>
|-
| bgcolor=#EEEEEE colspan=5 valign=top |<!--description of the opinion's position and reasoning, key quotes--><small></small>
|-
|bgcolor="#00cd00"|
| align=left valign=top|<small>''[[Mattel, Inc v 3894207 Canada Inc]]''<br> [2006] 1 SCR 772; 2006 SCC 22 [https://web.archive.org/web/20060711033522/http://scc.lexum.umontreal.ca/en/2006/2006scc22/2006scc22.html]</small>
| valign=top |<!--general area of law and specific issues/constitutional provisions in case--><small>Trade-marks</small>
| <!--justices that co-authored the opinion--><small> None</small>
| <!--justices that joined the opinion--><small> McLachlin CJ and Bastarache, Deschamps, Fish, Abella and Charron JJ</small>
|-
| bgcolor=#EEEEEE colspan=5 valign=top |<!--description of the opinion's position and reasoning, key quotes--><small></small>
|-
|bgcolor="#00cd00"|
| align=left valign=top|<small>''[[Veuve Clicquot Ponsardin v Boutiques Cliquot Ltée]]''<br> [2006] 1 SCR 824; 2006 SCC 23 [https://web.archive.org/web/20060726085024/http://scc.lexum.umontreal.ca/en/2006/2006scc23/2006scc23.html]</small>
| valign=top |<!--general area of law and specific issues/constitutional provisions in case--><small>Trade-marks, confusion, goodwill</small>
| <!--justices that co-authored the opinion--><small> None</small>
| <!--justices that joined the opinion--><small> Unanimous</small>
|-
| bgcolor=#EEEEEE colspan=5 valign=top |<!--description of the opinion's position and reasoning, key quotes--><small></small>
|-
|bgcolor="#00cd00"|
| align=left valign=top|<small>''[[Canada 3000 Inc, Re; Inter‑Canadian (1991) Inc (Trustee of)]]''<br> [2006] 1 SCR 865; 2006 SCC 24 [https://web.archive.org/web/20060725074504/http://scc.lexum.umontreal.ca/en/2006/2006scc24/2006scc24.html]</small>
| valign=top |<!--general area of law and specific issues/constitutional provisions in case--><small>Seizure of property, airplanes; statutory interpretation</small>
| <!--justices that co-authored the opinion--><small> None</small>
| <!--justices that joined the opinion--><small> Unanimous</small>
|-
| bgcolor=#EEEEEE colspan=5 valign=top |<!--description of the opinion's position and reasoning, key quotes--><small></small>
|-
|bgcolor="#00cd00"|
| align=left valign=top|<small>''[[Leskun v Leskun]]''<br> [2006] 1 SCR 920; 2006 SCC 25 [https://web.archive.org/web/20060722061819/http://scc.lexum.umontreal.ca/en/2006/2006scc25/2006scc25.html]</small>
| valign=top |<!--general area of law and specific issues/constitutional provisions in case--><small>Misconduct in spousal support</small>
| <!--justices that co-authored the opinion--><small> None</small>
| <!--justices that joined the opinion--><small> Unanimous</small>
|-
| bgcolor=#EEEEEE colspan=5 valign=top |<!--description of the opinion's position and reasoning, key quotes--><small></small>
|-
|bgcolor="#00cd00"|
| align=left valign=top|<small>''[[Celanese Canada Inc v Murray Demolition Corp]]''<br> 2006 SCC 36 [https://web.archive.org/web/20070313211040/http://scc.lexum.umontreal.ca/en/2006/2006scc36/2006scc36.html]</small>
| valign=top |<!--general area of law and specific issues/constitutional provisions in case--><small>Anton Piller orders; solicitor-client privilege</small>
| <!--justices that co-authored the opinion--><small> None</small>
| <!--justices that joined the opinion--><small> Unanimous</small>
|-
| bgcolor=#EEEEEE colspan=5 valign=top |<!--description of the opinion's position and reasoning, key quotes--><small></small>
|-
|bgcolor="red"|
| align=left valign=top|<small>''[[Imperial Oil Ltd v Canada; Inco Ltd v Canada]]''<br> 2006 SCC 46 [https://web.archive.org/web/20070318003928/http://scc.lexum.umontreal.ca/en/2006/2006scc46/2006scc46.html]</small>
| valign=top |<!--general area of law and specific issues/constitutional provisions in case--><small>Taxation, business income</small>
| <!--justices that co-authored the opinion--><small> None</small>
| <!--justices that joined the opinion--><small> Fish and Charron JJ</small>
|-
| bgcolor=#EEEEEE colspan=5 valign=top |<!--description of the opinion's position and reasoning, key quotes--><small></small>
|-
|bgcolor="#00cd00"|
| align=left valign=top|<small>''[[AstraZeneca Canada Inc v Canada (Minister of Health)]]''<br> 2006 SCC 49 [https://web.archive.org/web/20070221023256/http://scc.lexum.umontreal.ca/en/2006/2006scc49/2006scc49.html]</small>
| valign=top |<!--general area of law and specific issues/constitutional provisions in case--><small>Patents; notice of compliance</small>
| <!--justices that co-authored the opinion--><small> None</small>
| <!--justices that joined the opinion--><small> Unanimous</small>
|-
| bgcolor=#EEEEEE colspan=5 valign=top |<!--description of the opinion's position and reasoning, key quotes--><small></small>
|-
|bgcolor="#00b2ee"|
| align=left valign=top|<small>''[[R v Sappier; R v Gray]]''<br> 2006 SCC 54 [https://web.archive.org/web/20070107031453/http://scc.lexum.umontreal.ca/en/2006/2006scc54/2006scc54.html]</small>
| valign=top |<!--general area of law and specific issues/constitutional provisions in case--><small>Logging rights</small>
| <!--justices that co-authored the reason--><small> None</small>
| <!--justices that joined the reason--><small> None</small>
|-
| bgcolor=#EEEEEE colspan=5 valign=top |<!--description of the reason's position and reasoning, key quotes--><small></small>
|-
|bgcolor="red"|
| align=left valign=top|<small>''[[McDiarmid Lumber Ltd v God's Lake First Nation]]''<br> 2006 SCC 58 [https://web.archive.org/web/20070107031348/http://scc.lexum.umontreal.ca/en/2006/2006scc58/2006scc58.html]</small>
| valign=top |<!--general area of law and specific issues/constitutional provisions in case--><small>Aboriginal law, property rights</small>
| <!--justices that co-authored the reason--><small> None</small>
| <!--justices that joined the reason--><small> Fish and Abella JJ</small>
|-
| bgcolor=#EEEEEE colspan=5 valign=top |<!--description of the reason's position and reasoning, key quotes--><small></small>
|}
==2007==
{| class="wikitable" width=825
|- bgcolor="#CCCCCC"
! width=25px | !! width=35% | Case name !!  Issue !! width=15% | Co-authored by !! width=15% | Joined by
|-
|bgcolor="red"|
| align=left valign=top|<small>''[[Little Sisters Book and Art Emporium v Canada (Commissioner of Customs and Revenue)]]''<br> 2007 SCC 2</small>
| valign=top |<!--general area of law and specific issues/constitutional provisions in case--><small></small>
| <!--justices that co-authored the opinion--><small></small>
| <!--justices that joined the opinion--><small></small>
|-
| bgcolor=#EEEEEE colspan=5 valign=top |<!--description of the opinion's position and reasoning, key quotes--><small></small>
|-
|bgcolor=""|
| align=left valign=top|<small>''[[R v Beaudry]]''<br> 2007 SCC 5</small>
| valign=top |<!--general area of law and specific issues/constitutional provisions in case--><small></small>
| <!--justices that co-authored the opinion--><small></small>
| <!--justices that joined the opinion--><small></small>
|-
| bgcolor=#EEEEEE colspan=5 valign=top |<!--description of the opinion's position and reasoning, key quotes--><small></small>
|-
|bgcolor="00cd00"|
| align=left valign=top|<small>''[[Canadian Western Bank v Alberta]]''<br> 2007 SCC 22</small>
| valign=top |<!--general area of law and specific issues/constitutional provisions in case--><small></small>
| <!--justices that co-authored the opinion--><small></small>
| <!--justices that joined the opinion--><small></small>
|-
| bgcolor=#EEEEEE colspan=5 valign=top |<!--description of the opinion's position and reasoning, key quotes--><small></small>
|-
|bgcolor="00cd00"|
| align=left valign=top|<small>''[[British Columbia (AG) v Lafarge Canada Inc]]''<br> 2007 SCC 23</small>
| valign=top |<!--general area of law and specific issues/constitutional provisions in case--><small></small>
| <!--justices that co-authored the opinion--><small></small>
| <!--justices that joined the opinion--><small></small>
|-
| bgcolor=#EEEEEE colspan=5 valign=top |<!--description of the opinion's position and reasoning, key quotes--><small></small>
|-
|bgcolor="00cd00"|
| align=left valign=top|<small>''[[Strother v 3464920 Canada Inc]]''<br> 2007 SCC 24</small>
| valign=top |<!--general area of law and specific issues/constitutional provisions in case--><small></small>
| <!--justices that co-authored the opinion--><small></small>
| <!--justices that joined the opinion--><small></small>
|-
| bgcolor=#EEEEEE colspan=5 valign=top |<!--description of the opinion's position and reasoning, key quotes--><small></small>
|-
|bgcolor=""|
| align=left valign=top|<small>''[[R v Hape]]''<br> 2007 SCC 26</small>
| valign=top |<!--general area of law and specific issues/constitutional provisions in case--><small></small>
| <!--justices that co-authored the opinion--><small></small>
| <!--justices that joined the opinion--><small></small>
|-
| bgcolor=#EEEEEE colspan=5 valign=top |<!--description of the opinion's position and reasoning, key quotes--><small></small>
|-
|bgcolor=""|
| align=left valign=top|<small>''[[R v Clayton]]''<br> 2007 SCC 32</small>
| valign=top |<!--general area of law and specific issues/constitutional provisions in case--><small></small>
| <!--justices that co-authored the opinion--><small></small>
| <!--justices that joined the opinion--><small></small>
|-
| bgcolor=#EEEEEE colspan=5 valign=top |<!--description of the opinion's position and reasoning, key quotes--><small></small>
|-
|bgcolor=""|
| align=left valign=top|<small>''[[Kerr v Danier Leather Inc]]''<br> 2007 SCC 45</small>
| valign=top |<!--general area of law and specific issues/constitutional provisions in case--><small></small>
| <!--justices that co-authored the opinion--><small></small>
| <!--justices that joined the opinion--><small></small>
|-
| bgcolor=#EEEEEE colspan=5 valign=top |<!--description of the opinion's position and reasoning, key quotes--><small></small>
|-
|bgcolor="00cd00"|
| align=left valign=top|<small>''[[Citadel General Assurance Co v Vytlingam]]''<br> 2007 SCC 46</small>
| valign=top |<!--general area of law and specific issues/constitutional provisions in case--><small></small>
| <!--justices that co-authored the opinion--><small></small>
| <!--justices that joined the opinion--><small></small>
|-
| bgcolor=#EEEEEE colspan=5 valign=top |<!--description of the opinion's position and reasoning, key quotes--><small></small>
|-
|bgcolor="00cd00"|
| align=left valign=top|<small>''[[Lumbermens Mutual Casualty Co v Herbison]]''<br> 2007 SCC 47</small>
| valign=top |<!--general area of law and specific issues/constitutional provisions in case--><small></small>
| <!--justices that co-authored the opinion--><small></small>
| <!--justices that joined the opinion--><small></small>
|-
| bgcolor=#EEEEEE colspan=5 valign=top |<!--description of the opinion's position and reasoning, key quotes--><small></small>
|}
==2008==
==2009==
==2010==
{| width=100%
|-
|
{| width=100% align=center cellpadding=0 cellspacing=0
|-
! bgcolor=#CCCCCC | Statistics
|-
|
{| width=100% cellpadding="2" cellspacing="2" border="0"width=25px
|-
|
{| border="1" style="border-collapse:collapse;"
|-
| align=center bgcolor=#00CD00 width=25px | XXXXX
|}
| <small>Majority or Plurality</small>
| width=25px |
{| border="1" style="border-collapse:collapse;"
|-
| align=center width=25px bgcolor=#00B2EE |XXX
|}
| <small>Concurrence</small>
| width=25px |
{| border="1" style="border-collapse:collapse;"
|-
| align=center width=25px bgcolor=white |XXXX
|}
| <small>Other</small>
|-
| width=25px |
{| border="1" style="border-collapse:collapse;"
|-
| align=center width=25px bgcolor=red |XXXX
|}
| <small>Dissent</small>
| width=25px |
{| border="1" style="border-collapse:collapse;"
|-
| align=center width=25px bgcolor=#B23AEE |XXXX
|}
| <small>Concurrence/dissent</small>
| white-space: nowrap |'''Total = '''
| '''XXXXXX'''
|-
| colspan=2 | <small>Written opinions = XXX</small>
| colspan=2 | <small>Oral opinions = XXX</small>
| colspan=2 |<small> Unanimous decisions = XXX</small>
|}
|}
|}
{| class="wikitable" width=100%
|- bgcolor="#CCCCCC"
! width=25px | !! width=32.5% | Case name !!  Issue !! width=15% | Co-authored by !! width=15% | Joined by
|-
|bgcolor="00cd00"|
| align=left valign=top|<small>''XXX''<br> CITATIONS [URL]</small>
| valign=top |<!--general area of law and specific issues/constitutional provisions in case--><small> XXX</small>
| <!--justices that co-authored the opinion--><small> XXX</small>
| <!--justices that joined the opinion--><small>  XXX</small>
|-
| bgcolor=#EEEEEE colspan=5 valign=top |<!--description of the opinion's position and reasoning, key quotes--><small></small>
|-
|bgcolor="00cd00"|
| align=left valign=top|<small>''XXX''<br> CITATIONS [URL]</small>
| valign=top |<!--general area of law and specific issues/constitutional provisions in case--><small>XXX</small>
| <!--justices that co-authored the opinion--><small> XXX</small>
| <!--justices that joined the opinion--><small> XXX</small>
|-
|}
==2011==
{| width=100%
|-
|
{| width=100% align=center cellpadding=0 cellspacing=0
|-
! bgcolor=#CCCCCC | Statistics
|-
|
{| width=100% cellpadding="2" cellspacing="2" border="0"width=25px
|-
|
{| border="1" style="border-collapse:collapse;"
|-
| align=center bgcolor=#00CD00 width=25px | XXXXX
|}
| <small>Majority or Plurality</small>
| width=25px |
{| border="1" style="border-collapse:collapse;"
|-
| align=center width=25px bgcolor=#00B2EE |XXX
|}
| <small>Concurrence</small>
| width=25px |
{| border="1" style="border-collapse:collapse;"
|-
| align=center width=25px bgcolor=white |XXXX
|}
| <small>Other</small>
|-
| width=25px |
{| border="1" style="border-collapse:collapse;"
|-
| align=center width=25px bgcolor=red |XXXX
|}
| <small>Dissent</small>
| width=25px |
{| border="1" style="border-collapse:collapse;"
|-
| align=center width=25px bgcolor=#B23AEE |XXXX
|}
| <small>Concurrence/dissent</small>
| white-space: nowrap |'''Total = '''
| '''XXXXXX'''
|-
| colspan=2 | <small>Written opinions = XXX</small>
| colspan=2 | <small>Oral opinions = XXX</small>
| colspan=2 |<small> Unanimous decisions = XXX</small>
|}
|}
|}
{| class="wikitable" width=100%
|- bgcolor="#CCCCCC"
! width=25px | !! width=32.5% | Case name !!  Issue !! width=15% | Co-authored by !! width=15% | Joined by
|-
|bgcolor="00cd00"|
| align=left valign=top|<small>''R v Carron''<br> 2011 SCC 5 [https://scc-csc.lexum.com/scc-csc/scc-csc/en/item/7917/index.do]</small>
| valign=top |<!--general area of law and specific issues/constitutional provisions in case--><small> Whether a superior court has inherent jurisdiction to grant interim costs in litigation taking place in the provincial court</small>
| <!--justices that co-authored the opinion--><small> –</small>
| <!--justices that joined the opinion--><small>  McLachlin CJ and LeBel, Deschamps, Fish, Charron, Rothstein and Cromwell JJ</small>
|-
| bgcolor=#EEEEEE colspan=5 valign=top |<!--description of the opinion's position and reasoning, key quotes--><small></small>
|-
|bgcolor="red"|
| align=left valign=top|<small>''R v White''<br> 2011 SCC 13 [https://scc-csc.lexum.com/scc-csc/scc-csc/en/item/7926/index.do]</small>
| valign=top |<!--general area of law and specific issues/constitutional provisions in case--><small> Whether the trial judge's failure to state to the jury that post-offence conduct has no probative value constituted an error of law</small>
| <!--justices that co-authored the opinion--><small> –</small>
| <!--justices that joined the opinion--><small> McLachlin CJ and Fish J</small>
|-
| bgcolor=#EEEEEE colspan=5 valign=top |<!--description of the opinion's position and reasoning, key quotes--><small></small>
|-
|bgcolor="00cd00"|
| align=left valign=top|<small>''R v SD''<br> 2011 SCC 14 [https://scc-csc.lexum.com/scc-csc/scc-csc/en/item/7928/index.do]</small>
| valign=top |<!--general area of law and specific issues/constitutional provisions in case--><small>Whether the fact the accused was convicted of an offence on a date other than the one referred to in the indictment affected trial fairness</small>
| <!--justices that co-authored the opinion--><small> –</small>
| <!--justices that joined the opinion--><small> LeBel, Deschamps, Charron, Rothstein and Cromwell JJ</small>
|-
| bgcolor=#EEEEEE colspan=5 valign=top |<!--description of the opinion's position and reasoning, key quotes--><small></small>
|-
|bgcolor="00cd00"|
| align=left valign=top|<small>''Seidel v TELUS Communications Inc''<br> 2011 SCC 15 [https://scc-csc.lexum.com/scc-csc/scc-csc/en/item/7927/index.do]</small>
| valign=top |<!--general area of law and specific issues/constitutional provisions in case--><small> Whether provincial legislation, stating that contractual agreements to waive or release rights, benefits or protects under the legislation area void, renders an arbitration clause in a standard form cell phone contract void</small>
| <!--justices that co-authored the opinion--><small> –</small>
| <!--justices that joined the opinion--><small> McLachlin CJ and Fish, Rothstein and Cromwell JJ</small>
|-
| bgcolor=#EEEEEE colspan=5 valign=top |<!--description of the opinion's position and reasoning, key quotes--><small></small>
|-
|bgcolor="00cd00"|
| align=left valign=top|<small>''British Columbia (AG) v Malik''<br> 2011 SCC 18 [URL]</small>
| valign=top |<!--general area of law and specific issues/constitutional provisions in case--><small> Whether a prior decision is admissible only where respondents are precluded by issue estoppel or abuse of process from relitigating the facts adduced — Whether a superior court judge hearing an ''ex parte'' application for an interlocutory order may admit findings and conclusions of prior judicial decision into evidence — Whether there was sufficient admissible evidence adduced to justify an ''Anton Piller'' order</small>
| <!--justices that co-authored the opinion--><small> –</small>
| <!--justices that joined the opinion--><small> ''Unanimous''</small>
|-
| bgcolor=#EEEEEE colspan=5 valign=top |<!--description of the opinion's position and reasoning, key quotes--><small></small>
|-
|bgcolor="red"|
| align=left valign=top|<small>''R v O'Brien''<br> 2011 SCC 29 [https://scc-csc.lexum.com/scc-csc/scc-csc/en/item/7943/index.do]</small>
| valign=top |<!--general area of law and specific issues/constitutional provisions in case--><small> Whether trial judge's error in not excluding bad character evidence and in not specifically addressing that evidence in his reasons caused a substantial wrong or a miscarriage of justice</small>
| <!--justices that co-authored the opinion--><small> –</small>
| <!--justices that joined the opinion--><small> LeBel J</small>
|-
| bgcolor=#EEEEEE colspan=5 valign=top |<!--description of the opinion's position and reasoning, key quotes--><small></small>
|-
|bgcolor="00cd00"|
| align=left valign=top|<small>''Canada (AG) v Mavi''<br> 2011 SCC 30 [https://scc-csc.lexum.com/scc-csc/scc-csc/en/item/7944/index.do]</small>
| valign=top |<!--general area of law and specific issues/constitutional provisions in case--><small> Whether ''Immigration and Refugee Protection Act'' provides discretion to enforce immigration sponsorship debt — Whether Ontario debt recovery policy improperly fettering exercise of statutory discretion</small>
| <!--justices that co-authored the opinion--><small> –</small>
| <!--justices that joined the opinion--><small> ''Unanimous''</small>
|-
| bgcolor=#EEEEEE colspan=5 valign=top |<!--description of the opinion's position and reasoning, key quotes--><small></small>
|-
|bgcolor="00cd00"|
| align=left valign=top|<small>''R v Barros''<br> 2011 SCC 51 [https://scc-csc.lexum.com/scc-csc/scc-csc/en/item/7967/index.do]</small>
| valign=top |<!--general area of law and specific issues/constitutional provisions in case--><small> Whether investigator hired by the defence is bound by informer privilege — Whether trial judge committed errors of law allowing appellate review of acquittals for offences of obstructing justice and extortion</small>
| <!--justices that co-authored the opinion--><small> –</small>
| <!--justices that joined the opinion--><small> McLachlin CJ and LeBel, Deschamps, Abella, Charron and Rothstein JJ</small>
|-
| bgcolor=#EEEEEE colspan=5 valign=top |<!--description of the opinion's position and reasoning, key quotes--><small></small>
|-
|bgcolor="00cd00"|
| align=left valign=top|<small>''R v Sarrazin''<br> 2011 SCC 54 [https://scc-csc.lexum.com/scc-csc/scc-csc/en/item/7970/index.do]</small>
| valign=top |<!--general area of law and specific issues/constitutional provisions in case--><small> Whether the potential verdict of attempted murder should have been left with the jury by the trial judge</small>
| <!--justices that co-authored the opinion--><small> –</small>
| <!--justices that joined the opinion--><small> McLachlin CJ and LeBel, Fish, Abella and Charron JJ</small>
|-
| bgcolor=#EEEEEE colspan=5 valign=top |<!--description of the opinion's position and reasoning, key quotes--><small></small>
|-
|bgcolor="00cd00"|
| align=left valign=top|<small>''Lax Kw'alaams Indian Band v Canada (AG)''<br> 2011 SCC 56 [https://scc-csc.lexum.com/scc-csc/scc-csc/en/item/7972/index.do]</small>
| valign=top |<!--general area of law and specific issues/constitutional provisions in case--><small> First Nations claiming rights to commercial harvesting and sale of all species of fish within their traditional waters, and whether pre-contact trade in fish product could evolve into modern commercial fishery — Whether historical record supported existence of fiduciary duty to grant claimants right to modern commercial fishery</small>
| <!--justices that co-authored the opinion--><small> –</small>
| <!--justices that joined the opinion--><small> ''Unanimous''</small>
|-
| bgcolor=#EEEEEE colspan=5 valign=top |<!--description of the opinion's position and reasoning, key quotes--><small></small>
|-
|bgcolor="00B2EE"|
| align=left valign=top|<small>''Alberta (Information and Privacy Commissioner) v Alberta Teachers' Association''<br> 2011 SCC 61 [https://scc-csc.lexum.com/scc-csc/scc-csc/en/item/7979/index.do]</small>
| valign=top |<!--general area of law and specific issues/constitutional provisions in case--><small> Whether a matter that was not raised at a tribunal may be judicially reviewed — Whether a tribunal's decision relating to the interpretation of its home statute or statutes closely connected to its functions is reviewable on a standard of reasonableness or correctness</small>
| <!--justices that co-authored the opinion--><small> –</small>
| <!--justices that joined the opinion--><small> Deschamps J</small>
|-
|}
==2012==
{| width=100%
|-
|
{| width=100% align=center cellpadding=0 cellspacing=0
|-
! bgcolor=#CCCCCC | Statistics
|-
|
{| width=100% cellpadding="2" cellspacing="2" border="0"width=25px
|-
|
{| border="1" style="border-collapse:collapse;"
|-
| align=center bgcolor=#00CD00 width=25px | 0
|}
| <small>Majority or Plurality</small>
| width=25px |
{| border="1" style="border-collapse:collapse;"
|-
| align=center width=25px bgcolor=#00B2EE |0
|}
| <small>Concurrence</small>
| width=25px |
{| border="1" style="border-collapse:collapse;"
|-
| align=center width=25px bgcolor=white |0
|}
| <small>Other</small>
|-
| width=25px |
{| border="1" style="border-collapse:collapse;"
|-
| align=center width=25px bgcolor=red |1
|}
| <small>Dissent</small>
| width=25px |
{| border="1" style="border-collapse:collapse;"
|-
| align=center width=25px bgcolor=#B23AEE |0
|}
| <small>Concurrence/dissent</small>
| white-space: nowrap |'''Total = '''
| '''1'''
|-
| colspan=2 | <small>Written opinions = 1</small>
| colspan=2 | <small>Oral opinions = 0</small>
| colspan=2 |<small> Unanimous decisions = 0</small>
|}
|}
|}
{| class="wikitable" width=100%
|- bgcolor="#CCCCCC"
! width=25px | !! width=45% | Case name !!  Issue !! width=15% | Co-authored by !! width=15% | Joined by
|-
|bgcolor="red"|
| align=left valign=top|<small>''R v DAI''<br> 2012 SCC 5 [https://scc-csc.lexum.com/scc-csc/scc-csc/en/item/7990/index.do]</small>
| valign=top |<!--general area of law and specific issues/constitutional provisions in case--><small> Whether adult witnesses with mental disabilities must demonstrate understanding of nature of obligation to tell truth in order to be deemed competent to testify</small>
| <!--justices that co-authored the opinion--><small> –</small>
| <!--justices that joined the opinion--><small>  LeBel and Fish JJ</small>
|-
|}
{{Supreme Court of Canada}}
[[Category:Supreme Court of Canada reasons by judge|Binnie]]