View source for Zeugma and syllepsis

{{Short description|Figures of speech}}
{{about|the rhetorical concept|other uses|Zeugma (disambiguation)}}
{{Use dmy dates|date=December 2013}}
In [[rhetoric]], '''zeugma''' ({{IPAc-en|audio=En-us-zeugma.ogg|ˈ|zj|uː|ɡ|m|ə}}; from the [[Ancient Greek language|Ancient Greek]] {{lang|grc|ζεῦγμα}}, {{transl|grc|''zeûgma''}}, <small>lit.</small> "a yoking together"<ref name=Slidell>Liddell, H. G. & al. ''A Greek-English Lexicon''. [https://www.perseus.tufts.edu/hopper/text?doc=Perseus%3Atext%3A1999.04.0057%3Aentry%3Dzeu%3Dgma "{{lang|grc|ζεῦγμα}}"]. Perseus Project. Retrieved 24 January 2013.</ref>) and '''syllepsis''' ({{IPAc-en|s|ɪ|ˈ|l|ɛ|p|s|ɪ|s}}; from the Ancient Greek {{lang|grc|σύλληψις}}, {{transl|grc|''sullēpsis''}}, <small>lit.</small> "a taking together"<ref name="Random House Syllepsis">''[[Random House Dictionary]]''. [http://dictionary.reference.com/browse/syllepsis?s=t "Syllepsis"]. 2013. Retrieved 24 January 2013.</ref>) are [[figures of speech]] in which a single phrase or word joins different parts of a sentence.<ref name=Dupriez1991>{{cite book|author=Bernard Marie Dupriez|title=A Dictionary of Literary Devices: Gradus, A-Z|url=https://archive.org/details/dictionaryoflite0000dupr|url-access=registration|access-date=25 September 2013|year=1991|publisher=University of Toronto Press|isbn=978-0-8020-6803-3|page=[https://archive.org/details/dictionaryoflite0000dupr/page/440 440]}}</ref>
== Definition ==
In current usage, there are multiple and sometimes conflicting definitions for zeugma and syllepsis.<ref>{{Cite web|date=2020-05-21|title=What is a Zeugma? {{!}}{{!}} Oregon State Guide to Literary Terms|url=https://liberalarts.oregonstate.edu/wlf/what-zeugma|access-date=2021-08-31|website=College of Liberal Arts|language=en}}</ref> This article categorizes these two figures of speech into four types, based on four definitions:
=== Type 1 ===
Grammatical syllepsis (sometimes also called ''zeugma''): where a single word is used in relation to two parts of a sentence although grammatically or logically applying to only one.<ref name="Random House Syllepsis" /><ref name="literarydevices.net">{{cite web|work=Literary Devices|url=https://literarydevices.net/zeugma/|title=Zeugma|access-date=7 April 2018|date=16 September 2013}}</ref>
By definition, grammatical syllepsis will often be [[Solecism|grammatically "incorrect"]] according to traditional grammatical rules. However, such solecisms are sometimes not errors but intentional constructions in which the rules of grammar are bent by necessity or for stylistic effect.
* "He works his work, I mine"
This quote from [[Alfred Tennyson]]'s poem "[[Ulysses (poem)|Ulysses]]" is ungrammatical from a grammarian's viewpoint, because "works" does not grammatically [[Agreement (linguistics)|agree]] with "I": the sentence "I works mine" would be [[Agreement (linguistics)#Person|ungrammatical]]. On the other hand, Tennyson's two sentences could be taken to deploy a different figure of speech, namely "ellipsis". The sentence would be taken to mean,
* "He works his work, [and] I [work] mine."
Read in this way, the conjunction is not ungrammatical.
=== Type 2 ===
Zeugma (often also called ''syllepsis'', or ''semantic syllepsis''): a single word is used in two parts of a sentence but must be understood differently in relation to each.<ref name="Random">''Random House Dictionary''. [http://dictionary.reference.com/browse/zeugma?s=t "Zeugma"]. 2013. Retrieved 24 January 2013.</ref><ref>''Oxford Dictionaries Online''. [https://web.archive.org/web/20130917121425/http://oxforddictionaries.com/definition/english/zeugma?q=zeugma "Zeugma"]. [[Oxford University Press]]. Retrieved 24 January 2013.</ref><ref>WordNet. [http://wordnetweb.princeton.edu/perl/webwn?s=zeugma "Zeugma"]. Princeton University Press. Retrieved 23 January 2013.</ref><ref>Knapp, James F. ''The Norton Anthology of Poetry''. [http://www.wwnorton.com/college/english/nap/Glossary_Versification.htm "Glossary of Literary Terms"]. [[W.W. Norton|W.&nbsp;W. Norton & Co.]], 2005. Retrieved 24 January 2013.</ref> Example: "He took his hat and his leave." The type of figure is grammatically correct but creates its effect by seeming, at first hearing, to be incorrect by its exploiting multiple shades of meaning in a single word or phrase.<!-- Sorted by author's last name-->
*"[[Kensington Palace|Here]] Thou, great [[Anne, Queen of Great Britain|Anna]]! whom [[Kingdom of Great Britain|three Realms]] obey,<br />Dost sometimes Counsel take {{ndash}} and sometimes Tea." ([[Alexander Pope]], ''[[The Rape of the Lock]]'', Canto III)<ref name="Baldwick, Chris 2008. p. 325">Baldwick, Chris. 2008. ''Oxford Dictionary of Literary Terms''. "Syllepsis" Oxford University Press. New York. p. 325.</ref><ref>Corbett, Edward P.J. and Conners, Robert J. 1999. ''Style and Statement''. Oxford University Press. New York. Oxford. pp. 63-64.</ref>
* "Miss Bolo [...] went straight home, in a flood of tears and a [[sedan chair|sedan-chair]]." ([[Charles Dickens]], ''[[The Pickwick Papers]]'', [[wikisource:The Pickwick Papers/Chapter 35|Chapter 35]])<ref name="Baldwick, Chris 2008. p. 325"/>
* “They sought it with thimbles, they sought it with care; / They pursued it with forks and hope.”([[Lewis Carroll]], “[[The Hunting of the Snark]]”)
* "And he said as he hastened to put out the cat, the wine, his cigar, and the lamps... She lowered her standards by raising her glass, her courage, her eyes and his hopes... When he asked 'What in heaven?' she made no reply, up her mind, and a dash for the door." ([[Flanders and Swann]], "[[Have Some Madeira M'Dear]]")<ref name="literarydevices.net"/><ref>{{Cite book|last=Burton|first=Neel|title=Hypersanity: Thinking Beyond Thinking|publisher=Acheron|year=2019|isbn=9781913260002|chapter=Chapter 6: Rhetoric}}</ref>
* "They covered themselves with dust and glory." ([[Mark Twain]], ''[[The Adventures of Tom Sawyer]]'').<ref name="literarydevices.net"/>
* "He watches afternoon [[Rerun|repeats]] and the food he eats." ([[Blur (band)|Blur]], "[[Country House (song)|Country House]]")
* "You held your breath and the door for me." ([[Alanis Morissette]], "[[Head Over Feet]]")
* "I took the podium and my second trophy of the evening." ([[Samuel R. Delany]], "Racism and Science Fiction")<ref>{{cite journal |last=Delany |first=Samuel R. |date=August 1998 |title=Racism and Science Fiction |url=http://www.nyrsf.com/racism-and-science-fiction-.html  |journal=[[New York Review of Science Fiction]] |issue=120 |access-date=2 July 2020}}</ref>
* “My blood sugar fell dramatically and so did I.”([[Elaine Stritch]], “[[Elaine Stritch at Liberty]]”)
* "{{lang|fr|Quand les Français à tête folle / S'en allèrent dans l'Italie, / Ils gagnèrent à l'étourdie / Et Gênes et Naples et la Vérole.}}" ["On their flippant way through Italy, the French carelessly picked up Genoa, Naples and syphilis."] ([[Voltaire]])<ref>{{Cite web|title=Histoire de la lutte contre les maladies vénériennes à Rouen|url=https://www.chu-rouen.fr/wp-content/uploads/sites/2/2017/04/Histoire-de-la-lutte-contre-les-maladies-veneriennes-a-Rouen-1ere-partie-Dr.-Karl-Feltgen-Seance-GHHR-11-decembre-2002.pdf|last=Feltgen|date=11 December 2002|website=Groupe Histoire des Hôpitaux de Rouen|access-date=18 May 2020}}</ref><ref>{{Cite journal|last=Frith|first=John|date=November 2012|title=Syphilis: Its Early History and Treatment Until Penicillin, and the Debate on its Origins|url=http://www.pitt.edu/~nancyp/uhc-1510/SyphilisHistoryExcerpted.pdf|journal=Journal of Military and Veterans' Health|volume= 20| issue = 4|pages=49–56}}</ref>
When the meaning of a verb varies for the nouns following it, there is a standard order for the nouns: the noun first takes the most prototypical or literal meaning of the verb and is followed by the noun or nouns taking the less prototypical or more figurative verb meanings.<ref name=Shen>{{cite journal|last=Shen|first=Yeshayahu|title=Zeugma: Prototypes, Categories, And Metaphors|journal= Metaphor and Symbol|date=March 1998|volume=13|issue=1|pages=31–47|doi=10.1207/s15327868ms1301_3}}</ref>
* "The boy swallowed milk and kisses," as contrasted with "The boy swallowed kisses and milk".<ref name=Shen/>
The opposite process, in which the first noun expresses a figurative meaning and the second a more literal meaning, tends to create a comic effect:  "and she feeds me love and tenderness and macaroons." ([[The Stampeders]], "[[Sweet City Woman]]")
=== Type 3 ===
The ''Oxford Dictionary of Literary Terms'' offers a much broader definition for ''zeugma'' by defining it as any case of [[parallelism (rhetoric)|parallelism]] and [[ellipsis (rhetoric)|ellipsis]] working together so that a single word governs two or more parts of a sentence.<ref>Baldick, Chris. ''The Concise Oxford Dictionary of Literary Terms''. "Zeugma". 2004.</ref>
* {{lang|la|'''Vicit''' pudorem libido timorem audacia rationem amentia.}} ([[Cicero]], {{lang|la|[[Pro Cluentio]]}}, VI.15)
*:"Lust '''conquered''' shame; audacity, fear; madness, reason."
The more usual way of phrasing this would be "Lust conquered shame, audacity conquered fear, and madness conquered reason." The sentence consists of three parallel clauses, called parallel because each has the same word order: verb, object, subject in the original Latin; subject, verb, object in the English translation. The verb "conquered" is a common element in each clause. The zeugma is created in both the original and the translation by removing the second and third instances of "conquered". Removing words that still can be understood by the context of the remaining words is ellipsis.
* Histories make men wise; poets, witty; the mathematics, subtle; natural philosophy, deep; moral, grave; logic and rhetoric, able to contend. ([[Francis Bacon]])<ref name="Bacon 1601">{{cite web|last=Bacon|first=Francis|title=Of Studies|year=1601|url=http://andromeda.rutgers.edu/~jlynch/Texts/studies.html}}</ref>
The more usual way of phrasing this would be "Histories make men wise, poets make them witty, mathematics make them subtle, natural philosophy makes them deep, moral [philosophy] makes them grave, and logic and rhetoric make them able to contend." (Because ellipsis involves the omission of words, ambiguities can arise. The sentence could also be read as, "Histories make men wise, make poets witty, make mathematics subtle, make natural philosophy deep, makes moral [philosophy] grave, and make logic and rhetoric able to contend.")
Zeugmas are defined in this sense in [[Samuel Johnson]]'s 18th-century ''[[A Dictionary of the English Language]]''.<ref>Johnson, Samuel. ''A Dictionary of the English Language''.[https://books.google.com/books?id=PxRaXxKWiSoC&hl=en&pg=PA619 "Zeugma"]. 1755. Retrieved 24 January 2013.</ref>
=== Type 4 ===
A special case of semantic syllepsis occurs when a word or phrase is used both in its figurative and literal sense at the same time.<ref name="Dupriez1991" /> Then, it is not necessary for the governing phrase to relate to two parts of the sentence. One example is in an advertisement for a transport company: "We go a long way for you." This type of syllepsis operates in a similar manner to a homonymic [[pun]].
== Other types and related figures ==
There are several other definitions of zeugma that encompass other ways in which one word in a sentence can relate to two or more others. Even a simple construction like "this is easy and comprehensible" has been called<ref name="Dupriez1991" /> a "zeugma without complication" because "is" governs both "easy" and "comprehensible".<ref>{{Cite web|date=2013-09-16|title=Zeugma - Examples and Definition of Zeugma|url=https://literarydevices.net/zeugma/|access-date=2021-08-31|website=Literary Devices|language=en-US}}</ref>
Specialized figures have been defined to distinguish zeugmas with particular characteristics such as the following figures, which relate to the specific type and location of the governing word:
=== Diazeugma ===
A '''diazeugma'''<ref>{{cite web|title=diazeugma|work=Silva Rhetoricae|url=http://rhetoric.byu.edu/Figures/D/diazeugma.htm|access-date=2016-06-13}}</ref> is a zeugma whose only subject governs multiple verbs. A diazeugma whose only subject begins the sentence and controls a series of verbs is a "disjunction" ({{lang|la|disiunctio}}) in the {{lang|la|[[Rhetorica ad Herennium]]}}.<ref name="RaH" />
*{{lang|la|Populus Romanus Numantiam delevit Kartaginem sustulit Corinthum disiecit Fregellas evertit.}} (Anon. {{lang|la|[[Rhetorica ad Herennium]]}}. IV. xxvii.<ref name="RaH" />)
*:The Roman people [[siege of Numantia|destroyed]] [[Numantia]], [[Third Punic War|razed]] [[Carthage]], [[battle of Corinth (146 BC)|demolished]] [[Ancient Corinth|Corinth]], and [[siege of Fregellae|overthrew]] [[Fregellae]].
* "We shall pay any price, bear any burden, meet any hardship, support any friend, oppose any foe to assure the survival and the success of liberty." ([[Inauguration of John F. Kennedy|Inaugural address of John F. Kennedy]])
=== Hypozeugma ===
'''Hypozeugma'''<ref>{{cite web|title=hypozeugma|work=Silva Rhetoricae|url=http://rhetoric.byu.edu/Figures/H/hypozeugma.htm|access-date=2016-06-13}}</ref> or "adjunctions" ({{lang|la|adiunctio}})<ref>{{lang|la|[[Rhetorica ad Herennium]]}}<br /></ref> is used in a construction containing several phrases and occurs when the word or words on which all of the phrases depend are placed at the end.
* Assure yourself that [[Damon and Pythias|Damon to his Pythias]], [[Pylades]] to his [[Orestes]], Titus to his Gysippus, [[Theseus]] to his [[Pirithous|Pyrothus]], [[Scipio Africanus|Scipio]] to his [[Gaius Laelius|Laelius]], was never found more faithful than Euphues will be to his Philautus. ([[John Lyly]], ''[[Euphues]]'')<ref name="Prentice-Hall">{{cite book|url=https://archive.org/details/intimateartofwri0000ricc |url-access=registration |quote=prozeugma figure of speech. |title=The intimate art of writing poetry|year=1980 |first=Ottone M.|last=Riccio|publisher=[[Prentice-Hall]]|access-date=12 May 2013}}</ref>
=== Prozeugma ===
A '''prozeugma''',<ref>{{cite web|title=prozeugma|work=Silva Rhetoricae|url=http://rhetoric.byu.edu/Figures/P/prozeugma.htm|access-date=2016-06-13}}</ref> ''synezeugmenon'', or {{lang|la|praeiunctio}} is a zeugma whose governing word occurs in the first clause of the sentence.<ref name="Prentice-Hall" />
* {{lang|la|'''Vicit''' pudorem libido timorem audacia rationem amentia.}} ([[Cicero]], {{lang|la|[[Pro Cluentio]]}}, VI.15)
*:"Lust '''conquered''' shame; audacity, fear; madness, reason."
* Histories make men wise; poets, witty; the mathematics, subtle; natural philosophy, deep; moral, grave; logic and rhetoric, able to contend. ([[Francis Bacon]])<ref name="Bacon 1601" />
=== Mesozeugma ===
A '''mesozeugma'''<ref>{{cite web|title=mesozeugma|work=Silva Rhetoricae|url=http://rhetoric.byu.edu/Figures/M/mesozeugma.htm|access-date=2016-06-13}}</ref> is a zeugma whose governing word occurs in the middle of the sentence and governs clauses on either side. A mesozeugma whose common term is a verb is called "conjunction" ({{lang|la|coniunctio}}) in the Roman {{lang|la|Rhetorica ad Herennium}}.<ref name="RaH">{{lang|la|[[Rhetorica ad Herennium]]}}. [https://archive.org/stream/adcherenniumdera00capluoft#page/322/mode/2up/ IV. xxvii.] Retrieved 24 January 2013. via [[Internet Archive]]</ref>
*"What a shame is this, that neither hope of reward, nor feare of reproch '''could any thing move him''', neither the persuasion of his friends, nor the love of his country. {{sic}}" ([[Henry Peacham (born 1546)|Henry Peacham]])
== See also ==
{{colbegin}}
*[[Glossary of rhetorical terms]]
*[[Figure of speech]]
*[[Rhetoric]]
*[[Hypozeuxis]]
*[[Antanaclasis]]
*[[Anaphora (rhetoric)|Anaphora]]
*[[Pun]]
*[[Syndeton]]
*[[Polysyndeton]]
*[[Tom Swifty]]
{{colend}}
== References ==
{{Reflist|30em}}
== External links ==
{{Wiktionary|zeugma|syllepsis}}
* [http://www.wunderland.com/WTS/Alison/lexophilia/sub-things/zeugma.html Some examples of zeugma as a synonym for syllepsis]
* [https://www.perseus.tufts.edu/ Perseus Project] with links to original sources on rhetoric
* [http://www.literarydevices.com/zeugma/ Zeugma] Explained
{{Figures of speech}}
[[Category:Rhetoric]]
[[Category:Figures of speech]]
[[Category:Poetic devices]]