Ideal language philosophy

From The Right Wiki
Revision as of 15:19, 27 October 2024 by imported>Monkbot (Task 20: replace {lang-??} templates with {langx|??} ‹See Tfd› (Replaced 1);)
(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
Jump to navigationJump to search

Ideal language philosophy is contrasted with ordinary language philosophy. From about 1910 to 1930, analytic philosophers like Bertrand Russell and Ludwig Wittgenstein emphasized creating an ideal language for philosophical analysis, which would be free from the ambiguities of natural language that, in their opinion, often made for philosophical error. During this phase, Russell and Wittgenstein sought to understand language (and hence philosophical problems) by using formal logic to formalize the way in which philosophical statements are made. Wittgenstein developed a comprehensive system of logical atomism in his Tractatus Logico-Philosophicus (German: Logisch-Philosophische Abhandlung, 1921). He thereby argued that the universe is the totality of facts and not things: actual states of affairs and that these states of affairs can be expressed by the language of first-order predicate logic. Thus a picture of the universe can be construed by means of expressing atomic facts in the form of atomic propositions, and linking them using logical operators.

See also

References

  • Barber, Alex; Stainton, Robert, eds. (2010). Concise Encyclopedia of Philosophy of Language and Linguistics. Oxford: Elsevier. p. 47. ISBN 978-0-08-096500-0. OCLC 377840723.
  • Moore, A. W. (2012). The Evolution of Modern Metaphysics: Making Sense of Things. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. pp. 230, 242, 224–54. ISBN 978-1-139-02922-3. OCLC 778278812.