McLane Co. v. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission

From The Right Wiki
Revision as of 02:32, 2 November 2024 by imported>SilverLocust (spelling, page number, votes)
(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
Jump to navigationJump to search

McLane Co. v. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission
Decided April 3, 2017
Full case nameMcLane Co. v. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission
Docket no.15-1248
Citations581 U.S. 72 (more)
Holding
A district court's decision whether to enforce or quash a subpoena issued by the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission should be reviewed for abuse of discretion, not de novo.
Court membership
Chief Justice
John Roberts
Associate Justices
Anthony Kennedy · Clarence Thomas
Ruth Bader Ginsburg · Stephen Breyer
Samuel Alito · Sonia Sotomayor
Elena Kagan
Case opinions
MajoritySotomayor, joined by Roberts, Kennedy, Thomas, Breyer, Alito, Kagan
Concur/dissentGinsburg

McLane Co. v. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, 581 U.S. 72 (2017), was a United States Supreme Court case in which the Court held that a district court's decision whether to enforce or quash a subpoena issued by the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission should be reviewed for abuse of discretion, not de novo.[1][2]

References

  1. McLane Co. v. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, No. 15-1248, 581 U.S. ___ (2017).
  2. "Opinion analysis: Court unanimously adopts abuse-of-discretion review for district court decisions to enforce EEOC subpoenas". SCOTUSblog. April 4, 2017. Retrieved November 2, 2024.

External links

  • Text of McLane Co. v. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, No. 15-1248, 581 U.S. ___ (2017) is available from: Justia

This article incorporates written opinion of a United States federal court. As a work of the U.S. federal government, the text is in the public domain.