McLane Co. v. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission
From The Right Wiki
McLane Co. v. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission | |
---|---|
Decided April 3, 2017 | |
Full case name | McLane Co. v. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission |
Docket no. | 15-1248 |
Citations | 581 U.S. 72 (more) |
Holding | |
A district court's decision whether to enforce or quash a subpoena issued by the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission should be reviewed for abuse of discretion, not de novo. | |
Court membership | |
| |
Case opinions | |
Majority | Sotomayor, joined by Roberts, Kennedy, Thomas, Breyer, Alito, Kagan |
Concur/dissent | Ginsburg |
McLane Co. v. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, 581 U.S. 72 (2017), was a United States Supreme Court case in which the Court held that a district court's decision whether to enforce or quash a subpoena issued by the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission should be reviewed for abuse of discretion, not de novo.[1][2]
References
External links
- Text of McLane Co. v. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, No. 15-1248, 581 U.S. ___ (2017) is available from: Justia
This article incorporates written opinion of a United States federal court. As a work of the U.S. federal government, the text is in the public domain.