Birth defects of diethylstilbestrol

From The Right Wiki
Revision as of 20:37, 17 August 2024 by imported>Dollasdal (Sexual differentiation: remove html tag)
(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
Jump to navigationJump to search

Diethylstilbestrol (DES), a synthetic nonsteroidal estrogen which was previously used clinically to support pregnancy, has been linked to a variety of long-term adverse effects in women who were treated with it during pregnancy and in their offspring.[1]

First generation

An estimated 3 million pregnant women in the USA were prescribed DES from 1941 through 1971.[2][3] DES was also widely prescribed to women in Canada, the UK, Europe, Australia, and New Zealand during a similar period. Women who were prescribed DES during pregnancy have been shown to have a modestly increased risk of breast cancer and breast cancer mortality.[4]

Second generation

DES daughters

DES gained notoriety when it was shown to cause a rare vaginal tumor in girls and young women who had been exposed to this drug in utero. In 1971, the New England Journal of Medicine published a report showing that seven of eight girls and young women (ages 14 to 22) who had been diagnosed with vaginal clear cell adenocarcinoma had been exposed prenatally to DES.[5] Subsequent studies have shown an approximate 40-fold increased risk of vaginal/cervical clear cell adenocarcinoma in women exposed in utero to DES. As a consequence of this evidence, DES is considered an established human carcinogen. DES was one of the first transplacental carcinogens discovered in humans, meaning a toxin could cross the placenta and harm the fetus. It had originally been believed that the placenta protected the developing fetus but it is now known that is not true. Daughters exposed to DES in utero may also have an increased risk of moderate to severe cervical squamous cell dysplasia and an increased risk of breast cancer.[6] In addition to its carcinogenic properties, DES is a known teratogen, an agent capable of causing malformations in daughters and sons who were exposed in utero. DES-exposed daughters are at an increased risk of abnormalities of the reproductive tract, including vaginal epithelial changes such as vaginal adenosis (which means a type of cell normally found in the uterus, columnar cells, are also present in the vagina), an increased cervical transformation zone, and uterine abnormalities, such as T-shaped uterus. These anomalies contribute to an increased risk of infertility and adverse pregnancy outcomes in prenatally DES-exposed daughters. The most recent published research on DES daughters' adverse health outcomes documented by the U.S. National Cancer Institute (NCI) appears in the October 6, 2011 issue of the New England Journal of Medicine under the authorship of RN Hoover et al., and lists these adverse effects and risk factors: Cumulative risks in women exposed to DES, as compared with those not exposed, were as follows: for infertility, 33.3% vs. 15.5%; spontaneous abortion, 50.3% vs. 38.6%; preterm delivery, 53.3% vs. 17.8%; loss of second-trimester pregnancy, 16.4% vs. 1.7%; ectopic pregnancy, 14.6% vs. 2.9%; preeclampsia, 26.4% vs. 13.7%; stillbirth, 8.9% vs. 2.6%; early menopause, 5.1% vs. 1.7%; grade 2 or higher cervical intraepithelial neoplasia, 6.9% vs. 3.4%; and breast cancer at 40 years of age or older, 3.9% vs. 2.2%.[7] Daughters with prenatal exposure to DES may also have an increased risk of uterine fibroids, and incompetent cervix in adulthood.[8] In an animal model designed to study environmental estrogens, DES turned out to be an obesogen capable of causing adult weight gain in female mice which had been exposed to DES during neonatal development. The excess weight gain was not apparent at birth or in infancy, but occurred in adulthood.[9][10]

DES sons

Initially, fewer studies documented risks of prenatal exposure to DES on males (referred to as "DES sons"). In the 1970s and early 1980s, studies published on prenatally DES-exposed males investigated increased risk of testicular cancer, infertility and urogenital abnormalities in development, such as cryptorchidism and hypospadias.[11][12] Research published in the U.S. by Palmer et al. in 2009 further confirmed evidence of these findings.[13] Additional research published in Finland in 2012 has further confirmed an increased risk of cryptorchidism among males exposed prenatally to DES.[14] The U.S. Centers for Disease Control (CDC) has acknowledged the link between DES exposure and noncancerous epididymal cysts.[15] The American Association of Clinical Endocrinologists (AACE) has documented that prenatal DES exposure in males is positively linked to a condition known as hypogonadism (low testosterone levels) that may require treatment with testosterone replacement therapy.[16]

Sexual differentiation

DES Daughters and Sons study

A study conducted by the US National Cancer Institute, which assessed about 5,600 women and 2,600 men who had documented prenatal exposure to DES, called "DES Daughters" and "DES Sons", respectively, found that "DES Daughters were just as likely as unexposed women to be left-handed. DES Sons were slightly more likely to be left-handed than unexposed men (14% vs. 11%, respectively).[17] The researchers found no association between DES exposure and reported mental illness in DES Daughters, although the authors cautioned that this aspect may be under-represented due to the nature of self-reported data. In addition, no association was found between DES exposure and anorexia or bulimia."[18]

Psychological anomalies

Most of the initial research documenting the psychological effects of prenatal DES exposure was poorly conducted, often by mail card. Despite that, some more carefully conducted studies show a clear link to depression,[19][20] and a more recent French study asserts that there was an 83% increase in psychological disorders for offspring that were prenatally exposed to DES.[21]

Third generation

Current research also looks at DES in the third generation. These are the grandchildren of women who were given DES during pregnancy and whose mother or father was therefore exposed to DES in utero. Studies of the third generation are important because DES might be associated with epigenetic changes, which involve changes to the way genes behave (not involving the DNA itself) that may be heritable from one generation to another. If epigenetic changes occur and are heritable, studies of the DES-exposed third generation have implications for the influence of environmental endocrine disruptors on human health and evolution. Recent studies from the US National Cancer Institute (NCI) show that the daughters of women who were exposed in utero to DES may be less likely than the unexposed to have regular menstrual periods.[22] A possible increased risk of infertility in the older, third generation daughters was also noted. The NCI study provides limited evidence of an increased risk of birth defects in the sons or daughters of women who were exposed prenatally to DES. An increased risk of ovarian cancer in the daughters of women exposed in utero was observed, but it was based on three cases of almost 800, so the finding is considered preliminary and requires further study. Some evidence suggests the sons of prenatally DES-exposed women might have an increased risk of hypospadias,[23][24] but other studies suggest the increase in risk might not be as great as once thought.[25]

References

  1. Bamigboye AA, Morris J (2003). "Oestrogen supplementation, mainly diethylstilbestrol, for preventing miscarriages and other adverse pregnancy outcomes". Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2010 (3): CD004353. doi:10.1002/14651858.CD004353. PMC 9039959. PMID 12918007.
  2. "Problems in Research: Regulations—The Diethylstilbestrol Tragedy". The Medical Bag. 12 April 2013. Retrieved 29 April 2014.
  3. Hammes B, Laitman CJ (Jan–Feb 2003). "Diethylstilbestrol (DES) update: recommendations for the identification and management of DES-exposed individuals". Journal of Midwifery & Women's Health. 48 (1): 19–29. doi:10.1016/s1526-9523(02)00370-7. PMID 12589302.
  4. Titus-Ernstoff L, Hatch EE, Hoover RN, Palmer J, Greenberg ER, Ricker W, Kaufman R, Noller K, Herbst A, Colton T, Hartge P (January 2001). "Longterm cancer risk in women given diethystilbestrol (DES) in pregnancy". British Journal of Cancer. 84 (1): 126–133. doi:10.1054/bjoc.2000.1521. PMC 2363605. PMID 11139327.
  5. Herbst AL, Ulfelder H, Poskanzer DC (April 1971). "Adenocarcinoma of the vagina. Association of maternal stilbestrol therapy with tumor appearance in young women". The New England Journal of Medicine. 284 (15): 878–81. doi:10.1056/NEJM197104222841604. PMID 5549830.
  6. Troisi R, Hatch EE, Titus-Ernstoff L, Hyer M, Palmer JR, Robboy SJ, Strohsnitter WC, Kaufman R, Herbst AL, Hoover RN (July 2007). "Cancer risk in women prenatally exposed to diethylstilbestrol". International Journal of Cancer. 121 (2): 356–60. doi:10.1002/ijc.22631. PMID 17390375. S2CID 24362639.
  7. Hoover RN, Hyer M, Pfeiffer RM, Adam E, Bond B, Cheville AL, Colton T, Hartge P, Hatch EE, Herbst AL, Karlan BY, Kaufman R, Noller KL, Palmer JR, Robboy SJ, Saal RC, Strohsnitter W, Titus-Ernstoff L, Troisi R (October 2011). "Adverse health outcomes in women exposed in utero to diethylstilbestrol". The New England Journal of Medicine. 365 (14): 1304–14. doi:10.1056/NEJMoa1013961. PMID 21991952.
  8. Office of Research on Women’s Health, NIH, DHHS (March 2006). "Status of Research on Uterine Fibroids (leiomyomata uteri) at the National Institutes of Health" (PDF). United States National Institutes of Health. Archived from the original (PDF) on 2010-05-27. Retrieved 2018-07-21.{{cite web}}: CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list (link)
  9. Newbold RR, Padilla-Banks E, Snyder RJ, Jefferson WN (July 2007). "Perinatal exposure to environmental estrogens and the development of obesity". Molecular Nutrition & Food Research. 51 (7): 912–7. doi:10.1002/mnfr.200600259. PMID 17604389.
  10. Newbold RR, Padilla-Banks E, Snyder RJ, Phillips TM, Jefferson WN (2007). "Developmental exposure to endocrine disruptors and the obesity epidemic". Reproductive Toxicology. 23 (3): 290–6. Bibcode:2007RepTx..23..290N. doi:10.1016/j.reprotox.2006.12.010. PMC 1931509. PMID 17321108.
  11. Henderson BE, Benton B, Cosgrove M, Baptista J, Aldrich J, Townsend D, Hart W, Mack TM (October 1976). "Urogenital tract abnormalities in sons of women treated with diethylstilbestrol". Pediatrics. 58 (4): 505–7. doi:10.1542/peds.58.4.505. PMID 972792.
  12. Gill WB, Schumacher GF, Bibbo M, Straus FH, Schoenberg HW (July 1979). "Association of diethylstilbestrol exposure in utero with cryptorchidism, testicular hypoplasia and semen abnormalities". The Journal of Urology. 122 (1): 36–9. doi:10.1016/s0022-5347(17)56240-0. PMID 37351.
  13. Palmer JR, Herbst AL, Noller KL, Boggs DA, Troisi R, Titus-Ernstoff L, Hatch EE, Wise LA, Strohsnitter WC, Hoover RN (August 2009). "Urogenital abnormalities in men exposed to diethylstilbestrol in utero: a cohort study". Environmental Health. 8 (1): 37. Bibcode:2009EnvHe...8...37P. doi:10.1186/1476-069X-8-37. PMC 2739506. PMID 19689815.
  14. Virtanen HE, Adamsson A (May 2012). "Cryptorchidism and endocrine disrupting chemicals". Molecular and Cellular Endocrinology. 355 (2): 208–20. doi:10.1016/j.mce.2011.11.015. PMID 22127307.
  15. "Known Health Effects for DES Sons". United States Department of Health and Human Services: Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Retrieved 2011-06-30.
  16. "American Association of Clinical Endocrinologists Medical Guidelines for Clinical Practice for the Evaluation and Treatment of Hypogonadism in Adult-Male Patients--2002 Update" (PDF). American Association of Clinical Endocrinologists. Archived from the original (PDF) on 2017-08-09. Retrieved 2018-07-21.
  17. Titus-Ernstoff, Linda (March 2003). "Psychosexual characteristics of men and women exposed prenatally to diethylstilbestrol". Epidemiology. 14 (2): 155–160. doi:10.1097/01.EDE.0000039059.38824.B2. PMID 12606880. S2CID 31181675.
  18. "Recent DES Research: Psychosexual Characteristics of Men and Women Exposed Prenatally to Diethylstilbestrol". CDC. Retrieved 16 May 2017.
  19. Pillard RC, Rosen LR, Meyer-Bahlburg H, Weinrich JD, Feldman JF, Gruen R, Ehrhardt AA (1993). "Psychopathology and social functioning in men prenatally exposed to diethylstilbestrol (DES)". Psychosomatic Medicine. 55 (6): 485–91. doi:10.1097/00006842-199311000-00003. PMID 8310108. S2CID 25925008.
  20. O'Reilly EJ, Mirzaei F, Forman MR, Ascherio A (April 2010). "Diethylstilbestrol exposure in utero and depression in women". American Journal of Epidemiology. 171 (8): 876–82. doi:10.1093/aje/kwq023. PMC 2877444. PMID 20332145.
  21. Soyer-Gobillard MO, Paris F, Gaspari L, Courtet P, Sultan C (2016). "Association between fetal DES-exposure and psychiatric disorders in adolescence/adulthood: evidence from a French cohort of 1002 prenatally exposed children" (PDF). Gynecological Endocrinology. 32 (1): 25–9. doi:10.3109/09513590.2015.1063604. PMID 26172930. S2CID 207490080.
  22. Titus-Ernstoff L, Troisi R, Hatch EE, Wise LA, Palmer J, Hyer M, Kaufman R, Adam E, Strohsnitter W, Noller K, Herbst AL, Gibson-Chambers J, Hartge P, Hoover RN (August 2006). "Menstrual and reproductive characteristics of women whose mothers were exposed in utero to diethylstilbestrol (DES)". International Journal of Epidemiology. 35 (4): 862–8. doi:10.1093/ije/dyl106. PMID 16723367.
  23. Klip H, Verloop J, van Gool JD, Koster ME, Burger CW, van Leeuwen FE (March 2002). "Hypospadias in sons of women exposed to diethylstilbestrol in utero: a cohort study". Lancet. 359 (9312): 1102–7. doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(02)08152-7. PMID 11943257. S2CID 45769124.
  24. Kalfa N, Paris F, Soyer-Gobillard MO, Daures JP, Sultan C (June 2011). "Prevalence of hypospadias in grandsons of women exposed to diethylstilbestrol during pregnancy: a multigenerational national cohort study". Fertility and Sterility. 95 (8): 2574–7. doi:10.1016/j.fertnstert.2011.02.047. PMID 21458804.
  25. Brouwers MM, Feitz WF, Roelofs LA, Kiemeney LA, de Gier RP, Roeleveld N (March 2006). "Hypospadias: a transgenerational effect of diethylstilbestrol?". Human Reproduction. 21 (3): 666–9. doi:10.1093/humrep/dei398. PMID 16293648.