Bresler–Pister yield criterion

From The Right Wiki
Jump to navigationJump to search

The Bresler–Pister yield criterion[1] is a function that was originally devised to predict the strength of concrete under multiaxial stress states. This yield criterion is an extension of the Drucker–Prager yield criterion and can be expressed on terms of the stress invariants as

J2=A+BI1+CI12

where I1 is the first invariant of the Cauchy stress, J2 is the second invariant of the deviatoric part of the Cauchy stress, and A,B,C are material constants. Yield criteria of this form have also been used for polypropylene[2] and polymeric foams.[3] The parameters A,B,C have to be chosen with care for reasonably shaped yield surfaces. If σc is the yield stress in uniaxial compression, σt is the yield stress in uniaxial tension, and σb is the yield stress in biaxial compression, the parameters can be expressed as

B=(σtσc3(σt+σc))(4σb2σb(σc+σt)+σcσt4σb2+2σb(σtσc)σcσt)C=(13(σt+σc))(σb(3σtσc)2σcσt4σb2+2σb(σtσc)σcσt)A=σc3+BσcCσc2
File:Bresler Pister Yield Surface 3Da.png
Figure 1: View of the three-parameter Bresler–Pister yield surface in 3D space of principal stresses for σc=1,σt=0.3,σb=1.7
File:Bresler Pister Yield Surface 3Db.png
Figure 2: The three-parameter Bresler–Pister yield surface in the π-plane for σc=1,σt=0.3,σb=1.7
File:Bresler Pister Yield Surface sig1sig2.png
Figure 3: Trace of the three-parameter Bresler–Pister yield surface in the σ1σ2-plane for σc=1,σt=0.3,σb=1.7

Alternative forms of the Bresler-Pister yield criterion

In terms of the equivalent stress (σe) and the mean stress (σm), the Bresler–Pister yield criterion can be written as

σe=a+bσm+cσm2;σe=3J2,σm=I1/3.

The Etse-Willam[4] form of the Bresler–Pister yield criterion for concrete can be expressed as

J2=13I1123(σtσc2σt2)I12

where σc is the yield stress in uniaxial compression and σt is the yield stress in uniaxial tension. The GAZT yield criterion[5] for plastic collapse of foams also has a form similar to the Bresler–Pister yield criterion and can be expressed as

J2={13σt0.033ρρmσtI1213σc+0.033ρρmσcI12

where ρ is the density of the foam and ρm is the density of the matrix material.

References

  1. Bresler, B. and Pister, K.S., (1985), Strength of concrete under combined stresses, ACI Journal, vol. 551, no. 9, pp. 321–345.
  2. Pae, K. D., (1977), The macroscopic yield behavior of polymers in multiaxial stress fields, Journal of Materials Science, vol. 12, no. 6, pp. 1209-1214.
  3. Kim, Y. and Kang, S., (2003), Development of experimental method to characterize pressure-dependent yield criteria for polymeric foams. Polymer Testing, vol. 22, no. 2, pp. 197-202.
  4. Etse, G. and Willam, K., (1994), Fracture energy formulation for inelastic behavior of plain concrete, Journal of Engineering Mechanics, vol. 120, no. 9, pp. 1983-2011.
  5. Gibson, L. J., Ashby, M. F., Zhang, J., and Triantafillou, T. C. (1989). Failure surfaces for cellular materials under multiaxial loads. I. Modelling. International Journal of Mechanical Sciences, vol. 31, no. 9, pp. 635–663.

See also