Ramification group

From The Right Wiki
Jump to navigationJump to search

In number theory, more specifically in local class field theory, the ramification groups are a filtration of the Galois group of a local field extension, which gives detailed information on the ramification phenomena of the extension.

Ramification theory of valuations

In mathematics, the ramification theory of valuations studies the set of extensions of a valuation v of a field K to an extension L of K. It is a generalization of the ramification theory of Dedekind domains.[1][2] The structure of the set of extensions is known better when L/K is Galois.

Decomposition group and inertia group

Let (Kv) be a valued field and let L be a finite Galois extension of K. Let Sv be the set of equivalence classes of extensions of v to L and let G be the Galois group of L over K. Then G acts on Sv by σ[w] = [w ∘ σ] (i.e. w is a representative of the equivalence class [w] ∈ Sv and [w] is sent to the equivalence class of the composition of w with the automorphism σ : LL; this is independent of the choice of w in [w]). In fact, this action is transitive. Given a fixed extension w of v to L, the decomposition group of w is the stabilizer subgroup Gw of [w], i.e. it is the subgroup of G consisting of all elements that fix the equivalence class [w] ∈ Sv. Let mw denote the maximal ideal of w inside the valuation ring Rw of w. The inertia group of w is the subgroup Iw of Gw consisting of elements σ such that σx ≡ x (mod mw) for all x in Rw. In other words, Iw consists of the elements of the decomposition group that act trivially on the residue field of w. It is a normal subgroup of Gw. The reduced ramification index e(w/v) is independent of w and is denoted e(v). Similarly, the relative degree f(w/v) is also independent of w and is denoted f(v).

Ramification groups in lower numbering

Ramification groups are a refinement of the Galois group G of a finite L/K Galois extension of local fields. We shall write w,𝒪L,𝔭 for the valuation, the ring of integers and its maximal ideal for L. As a consequence of Hensel's lemma, one can write 𝒪L=𝒪K[α] for some αL where 𝒪K is the ring of integers of K.[3] (This is stronger than the primitive element theorem.) Then, for each integer i1, we define Gi to be the set of all sG that satisfies the following equivalent conditions.

  • (i) s operates trivially on 𝒪L/𝔭i+1.
  • (ii) w(s(x)x)i+1 for all x𝒪L
  • (iii) w(s(α)α)i+1.

The group Gi is called i-th ramification group. They form a decreasing filtration,

G1=GG0G1{*}.

In fact, the Gi are normal by (i) and trivial for sufficiently large i by (iii). For the lowest indices, it is customary to call G0 the inertia subgroup of G because of its relation to splitting of prime ideals, while G1 the wild inertia subgroup of G. The quotient G0/G1 is called the tame quotient. The Galois group G and its subgroups Gi are studied by employing the above filtration or, more specifically, the corresponding quotients. In particular,

  • G/G0=Gal(l/k), where l,k are the (finite) residue fields of L,K.[4]
  • G0=1L/K is unramified.
  • G1=1L/K is tamely ramified (i.e., the ramification index is prime to the residue characteristic.)

The study of ramification groups reduces to the totally ramified case since one has Gi=(G0)i for i0. One also defines the function iG(s)=w(s(α)α),sG. (ii) in the above shows iG is independent of choice of α and, moreover, the study of the filtration Gi is essentially equivalent to that of iG.[5] iG satisfies the following: for s,tG,

  • iG(s)i+1sGi.
  • iG(tst1)=iG(s).
  • iG(st)min{iG(s),iG(t)}.

Fix a uniformizer π of L. Then ss(π)/π induces the injection Gi/Gi+1UL,i/UL,i+1,i0 where UL,0=𝒪L×,UL,i=1+𝔭i. (The map actually does not depend on the choice of the uniformizer.[6]) It follows from this[7]

  • G0/G1 is cyclic of order prime to p
  • Gi/Gi+1 is a product of cyclic groups of order p.

In particular, G1 is a p-group and G0 is solvable. The ramification groups can be used to compute the different 𝔇L/K of the extension L/K and that of subextensions:[8]

w(𝔇L/K)=s1iG(s)=i=0(|Gi|1).

If H is a normal subgroup of G, then, for σG, iG/H(σ)=1eL/KsσiG(s).[9] Combining this with the above one obtains: for a subextension F/K corresponding to H,

vF(𝔇F/K)=1eL/Fs∉HiG(s).

If sGi,tGj,i,j1, then sts1t1Gi+j+1.[10] In the terminology of Lazard, this can be understood to mean the Lie algebra gr(G1)=i1Gi/Gi+1 is abelian.

Example: the cyclotomic extension

The ramification groups for a cyclotomic extension Kn:=Qp(ζ)/Qp, where ζ is a pn-th primitive root of unity, can be described explicitly:[11]

Gs=Gal(Kn/Ke),

where e is chosen such that pe1s<pe.

Example: a quartic extension

Let K be the extension of Q2 generated by x1=2+2. The conjugates of x1 are x2=22, x3=x1, x4=x2. A little computation shows that the quotient of any two of these is a unit. Hence they all generate the same ideal; call it π. 2 generates π2; (2)=π4. Now x1x3=2x1, which is in π5. and x1x2=422, which is in π3. Various methods show that the Galois group of K is C4, cyclic of order 4. Also:

G0=G1=G2=C4.

and G3=G4=(13)(24). w(𝔇K/Q2)=3+3+3+1+1=11, so that the different 𝔇K/Q2=π11 x1 satisfies X4 − 4X2 + 2, which has discriminant 2048 = 211.

Ramification groups in upper numbering

If u is a real number 1, let Gu denote Gi where i the least integer u. In other words, sGuiG(s)u+1. Define ϕ by[12]

ϕ(u)=0udt(G0:Gt)

where, by convention, (G0:Gt) is equal to (G1:G0)1 if t=1 and is equal to 1 for 1<t0.[13] Then ϕ(u)=u for 1u0. It is immediate that ϕ is continuous and strictly increasing, and thus has the continuous inverse function ψ defined on [1,). Define Gv=Gψ(v). Gv is then called the v-th ramification group in upper numbering. In other words, Gϕ(u)=Gu. Note G1=G,G0=G0. The upper numbering is defined so as to be compatible with passage to quotients:[14] if H is normal in G, then

(G/H)v=GvH/H for all v

(whereas lower numbering is compatible with passage to subgroups.)

Herbrand's theorem

Herbrand's theorem states that the ramification groups in the lower numbering satisfy GuH/H=(G/H)v (for v=ϕL/F(u) where L/F is the subextension corresponding to H), and that the ramification groups in the upper numbering satisfy GuH/H=(G/H)u.[15][16] This allows one to define ramification groups in the upper numbering for infinite Galois extensions (such as the absolute Galois group of a local field) from the inverse system of ramification groups for finite subextensions. The upper numbering for an abelian extension is important because of the Hasse–Arf theorem. It states that if G is abelian, then the jumps in the filtration Gv are integers; i.e., Gi=Gi+1 whenever ϕ(i) is not an integer.[17] The upper numbering is compatible with the filtration of the norm residue group by the unit groups under the Artin isomorphism. The image of Gn(L/K) under the isomorphism

G(L/K)abK*/NL/K(L*)

is just[18]

UKn/(UKnNL/K(L*)).

See also

Notes

  1. Fröhlich, A.; Taylor, M.J. (1991). Algebraic number theory. Cambridge studies in advanced mathematics. Vol. 27. Cambridge University Press. ISBN 0-521-36664-X. Zbl 0744.11001.
  2. Zariski, Oscar; Samuel, Pierre (1976) [1960]. Commutative algebra, Volume II. Graduate Texts in Mathematics. Vol. 29. New York, Heidelberg: Springer-Verlag. Chapter VI. ISBN 978-0-387-90171-8. Zbl 0322.13001.
  3. Neukirch (1999) p.178
  4. since G/G0 is canonically isomorphic to the decomposition group.
  5. Serre (1979) p.62
  6. Conrad
  7. Use UL,0/UL,1l× and UL,i/UL,i+1l+
  8. Serre (1979) 4.1 Prop.4, p.64
  9. Serre (1979) 4.1. Prop.3, p.63
  10. Serre (1979) 4.2. Proposition 10.
  11. Serre, Corps locaux. Ch. IV, §4, Proposition 18
  12. Serre (1967) p.156
  13. Neukirch (1999) p.179
  14. Serre (1967) p.155
  15. Neukirch (1999) p.180
  16. Serre (1979) p.75
  17. Neukirch (1999) p.355
  18. Snaith (1994) pp.30-31

References