Restricted power series

From The Right Wiki
(Redirected from Tate algebra)
Jump to navigationJump to search

In algebra, the ring of restricted power series is the subring of a formal power series ring that consists of power series whose coefficients approach zero as degree goes to infinity.[1] Over a non-archimedean complete field, the ring is also called a Tate algebra. Quotient rings of the ring are used in the study of a formal algebraic space as well as rigid analysis, the latter over non-archimedean complete fields. Over a discrete topological ring, the ring of restricted power series coincides with a polynomial ring; thus, in this sense, the notion of "restricted power series" is a generalization of a polynomial.

Definition

Let A be a linearly topologized ring, separated and complete and {Iλ} the fundamental system of open ideals. Then the ring of restricted power series is defined as the projective limit of the polynomial rings over A/Iλ:

Ax1,,xn=limλA/Iλ[x1,,xn].[2][3]

In other words, it is the completion of the polynomial ring A[x1,,xn] with respect to the filtration {Iλ[x1,,xn]}. Sometimes this ring of restricted power series is also denoted by A{x1,,xn}. Clearly, the ring Ax1,,xn can be identified with the subring of the formal power series ring A[[x1,,xn]] that consists of series cαxα with coefficients cα0; i.e., each Iλ contains all but finitely many coefficients cα. Also, the ring satisfies (and in fact is characterized by) the universal property:[4] for (1) each continuous ring homomorphism AB to a linearly topologized ring B, separated and complete and (2) each elements b1,,bn in B, there exists a unique continuous ring homomorphism

Ax1,,xnB,xibi

extending AB.

Tate algebra

In rigid analysis, when the base ring A is the valuation ring of a complete non-archimedean field (K,||), the ring of restricted power series tensored with K,

Tn=Kξ1,ξn=Aξ1,,ξnAK

is called a Tate algebra, named for John Tate.[5] It is equivalently the subring of formal power series k[[ξ1,,ξn]] which consists of series convergent on 𝔬kn, where 𝔬k:={xk:|x|1} is the valuation ring in the algebraic closure k. The maximal spectrum of Tn is then a rigid-analytic space that models an affine space in rigid geometry. Define the Gauss norm of f=aαξα in Tn by

f=maxα|aα|.

This makes Tn a Banach algebra over k; i.e., a normed algebra that is complete as a metric space. With this norm, any ideal I of Tn is closed[6] and thus, if I is radical, the quotient Tn/I is also a (reduced) Banach algebra called an affinoid algebra. Some key results are:

  • (Weierstrass division) Let gTn be a ξn-distinguished series of order s; i.e., g=ν=0gνξnν where gνTn1, gs is a unit element and |gs|=g>|gv| for ν>s.[7] Then for each fTn, there exist a unique qTn and a unique polynomial rTn1[ξn] of degree <s such that
    f=qg+r.[8]
  • (Weierstrass preparation) As above, let g be a ξn-distinguished series of order s. Then there exist a unique monic polynomial fTn1[ξn] of degree s and a unit element uTn such that g=fu.[9]
  • (Noether normalization) If 𝔞Tn is an ideal, then there is a finite homomorphism TdTn/𝔞.[10]

As consequence of the division, preparation theorems and Noether normalization, Tn is a Noetherian unique factorization domain of Krull dimension n.[11] An analog of Hilbert's Nullstellensatz is valid: the radical of an ideal is the intersection of all maximal ideals containing the ideal (we say the ring is Jacobson).[12]

Results

Results for polynomial rings such as Hensel's lemma, division algorithms (or the theory of Gröbner bases) are also true for the ring of restricted power series. Throughout the section, let A denote a linearly topologized ring, separated and complete.

  • (Hensel) Let 𝔪A be a maximal ideal and φ:Ak:=A/𝔪 the quotient map. Given an F in Aξ, if φ(F)=gh for some monic polynomial gk[ξ] and a restricted power series hkξ such that g,h generate the unit ideal of kξ, then there exist G in A[ξ] and H in Aξ such that
    F=GH,φ(G)=g,φ(H)=h.[13]

Notes

  1. Stacks Project, Tag 0AKZ.
  2. Grothendieck & Dieudonné 1960, Ch. 0, § 7.5.1.
  3. Bourbaki 2006, Ch. III, § 4. Definition 2 and Proposition 3.
  4. Grothendieck & Dieudonné 1960, Ch. 0, § 7.5.3.
  5. Fujiwara & Kato 2018, Ch 0, just after Proposition 9.3.
  6. Bosch 2014, § 2.3. Corollary 8
  7. Bosch 2014, § 2.2. Definition 6.
  8. Bosch 2014, § 2.2. Theorem 8.
  9. Bosch 2014, § 2.2. Corollary 9.
  10. Bosch 2014, § 2.2. Corollary 11.
  11. Bosch 2014, § 2.2. Proposition 14, Proposition 15, Proposition 17.
  12. Bosch 2014, § 2.2. Proposition 16.
  13. Bourbaki 2006, Ch. III, § 4. Theorem 1.

References

See also

External links