Chow group of a stack

From The Right Wiki
Jump to navigationJump to search

In algebraic geometry, the Chow group of a stack is a generalization of the Chow group of a variety or scheme to stacks. For a quotient stack X=[Y/G], the Chow group of X is the same as the G-equivariant Chow group of Y. A key difference from the theory of Chow groups of a variety is that a cycle is allowed to carry non-trivial automorphisms and consequently intersection-theoretic operations must take this into account. For example, the degree of a 0-cycle on a stack need not be an integer but is a rational number (due to non-trivial stabilizers).

Definitions

Angelo Vistoli (1989) develops the basic theory (mostly over Q) for the Chow group of a (separated) Deligne–Mumford stack. There, the Chow group is defined exactly as in the classical case: it is the free abelian group generated by integral closed substacks modulo rational equivalence. If a stack X can be written as the quotient stack X=[Y/G] for some quasi-projective variety Y with a linearized action of a linear algebraic group G, then the Chow group of X is defined as the G-equivariant Chow group of Y. This approach is introduced and developed by Dan Edidin and William A. Graham, as well as Burt Totaro. Later Andrew Kresch (1999) extended the theory to a stack admitting a stratification by quotient stacks. For higher Chow groups (precursor of motivic homologies) of algebraic stacks, see Roy Joshua's Intersection Theory on Stacks:I and II. [1]

Examples

The calculations depend on definitions. Thus, here, we proceed somehow axiomatically. Specifically, we assume: given an algebraic stack X locally of finite type over a base field k,

  1. (homotopy-invariance) if E is a rank-n vector bundle on X, then Ap(E)=Apn(X).
  2. for each integral substack Z of dimension < p, Ap(XZ)=Ap(X), a corollary of a localization sequence.

These properties are valid if X is Deligne–Mumford and are expected to hold for any other reasonable theory. We take X to be the classifying stack BG, the stack of principal G-bundles for a smooth linear algebraic group G. By definition, it is the quotient stack [*/G], where * is viewed as the stack associated to * = Spec k. We approximate it as follows. Given an integer p, choose a representation GGL(V) such that there is a G-invariant open subset U of V on which G acts freely and the complement Z=VU has codimension >dimGp. Let *×GV be the quotient of *×V by the action (x,v)g=(xg,g1v). Note the action is free and so *×GV is a vector bundle over BG. By Property 1 applied to this vector bundle,

Ap(BG)=Ap+dimV(*×GV).

Then, since *×GU=U/G, by Property 2,

Ap+dimV(*×GV)=Ap+dimV(U/G)

since dim[Z/G]=dimZdimG<dimV+p. As a concrete example, let G=𝔾m and let it act on 𝔸n by scaling. Then 𝔾m acts freely on U=𝔸n{0}. By the above calculation, for each pair of integers n, p such that n+p0,

Ap(B𝔾m)=Ap+n(n1).

In particular, for every integer p ≥ 0, Ap(B𝔾m)=0. In general, Ank(n)=hk for the hyperplane class h, hk k-times self-intersection and hk=0 for negative k and so

Ap(B𝔾m)=h1p

where the right-hand side is independent of models used in the calculation (since different h's correspond under the projections between projective spaces.) For p=1=dimB𝔾m, the class h0=[n], any n, may be thought of as the fundamental class of B𝔾m. Similarly, we have

A*(B𝔾m)=[c]

where c=c1(h) is the first Chern class of h (and c and h are identified when Chow groups and Chow rings of projective spaces are identified). Since hk=chk1, we have that A*(B𝔾m) is the free [c]-module generated by h0.

Virtual fundamental class

The notion originates in the Kuranishi theory in symplectic geometry.[1][2] In § 2. of Behrend (2009), given a DM stack X and CX the intrinsic normal cone to X, K. Behrend defines the virtual fundamental class of X as

[X]vir=s0![CX]

where s0 is the zero-section of the cone determined by the perfect obstruction theory and s0! is the refined Gysin homomorphism defined just as in Fulton's "Intersection theory". The same paper shows that the degree of this class, morally the integration over it, is equal to the weighted Euler characteristic of the Behrend function of X. More recent (circa 2017) approaches do this type of construction in the context of derived algebraic geometry.[3]

See also

Notes

  1. Fukaya, Kenji; Ono, Kaoru (1999). "Arnold conjecture and Gromov-Witten invariant". Topology. 38 (5): 933–1048. doi:10.1016/s0040-9383(98)00042-1. MR 1688434.
  2. Pardon, John (2016-04-28). "An algebraic approach to virtual fundamental cycles on moduli spaces of pseudo-holomorphic curves". Geometry & Topology. 20 (2): 779–1034. arXiv:1309.2370. doi:10.2140/gt.2016.20.779. ISSN 1364-0380. S2CID 119171219.
  3. § 1.2.1. of Cisinski, Denis-Charles; Khan, Adeel A. (2017-05-09). "Brave new motivic homotopy theory II: Homotopy invariant K-theory". arXiv:1705.03340 [math.AT].

References

External links