K-theory of a category

From The Right Wiki
Jump to navigationJump to search

In algebraic K-theory, the K-theory of a category C (usually equipped with some kind of additional data) is a sequence of abelian groups Ki(C) associated to it. If C is an abelian category, there is no need for extra data, but in general it only makes sense to speak of K-theory after specifying on C a structure of an exact category, or of a Waldhausen category, or of a dg-category, or possibly some other variants. Thus, there are several constructions of those groups, corresponding to various kinds of structures put on C. Traditionally, the K-theory of C is defined to be the result of a suitable construction, but in some contexts there are more conceptual definitions. For instance, the K-theory is a 'universal additive invariant' of dg-categories[1] and small stable ∞-categories.[2] The motivation for this notion comes from algebraic K-theory of rings. For a ring R Daniel Quillen in Quillen (1973) introduced two equivalent ways to find the higher K-theory. The plus construction expresses Ki(R) in terms of R directly, but it's hard to prove properties of the result, including basic ones like functoriality. The other way is to consider the exact category of projective modules over R and to set Ki(R) to be the K-theory of that category, defined using the Q-construction. This approach proved to be more useful, and could be applied to other exact categories as well. Later Friedhelm Waldhausen in Waldhausen (1985) extended the notion of K-theory even further, to very different kinds of categories, including the category of topological spaces.

K-theory of Waldhausen categories

In algebra, the S-construction is a construction in algebraic K-theory that produces a model that can be used to define higher K-groups. It is due to Friedhelm Waldhausen and concerns a category with cofibrations and weak equivalences; such a category is called a Waldhausen category and generalizes Quillen's exact category. A cofibration can be thought of as analogous to a monomorphism, and a category with cofibrations is one in which, roughly speaking, monomorphisms are stable under pushouts.[3] According to Waldhausen, the "S" was chosen to stand for Graeme B. Segal.[4] Unlike the Q-construction, which produces a topological space, the S-construction produces a simplicial set.

Details

The arrow category Ar(C) of a category C is a category whose objects are morphisms in C and whose morphisms are squares in C. Let a finite ordered set [n]={0<1<2<<n} be viewed as a category in the usual way. Let C be a category with cofibrations and let SnC be a category whose objects are functors f:Ar[n]C such that, for ijk, f(i=i)=*, f(ij)f(ik) is a cofibration, and f(jk) is the pushout of f(ij)f(ik) and f(ij)f(j=j)=*. The category SnC defined in this manner is itself a category with cofibrations. One can therefore iterate the construction, forming the sequenceS(m)C=SSC. This sequence is a spectrum called the K-theory spectrum of C.

The additivity theorem

Most basic properties of algebraic K-theory of categories are consequences of the following important theorem.[5] There are versions of it in all available settings. Here's a statement for Waldhausen categories. Notably, it's used to show that the sequence of spaces obtained by the iterated S-construction is an Ω-spectrum. Let C be a Waldhausen category. The category of extensions (C) has as objects the sequences ABA in C, where the first map is a cofibration, and BA is a quotient map, i.e. a pushout of the first one along the zero map A0. This category has a natural Waldhausen structure, and the forgetful functor [ABA](A,A) from (C) to C × C respects it. The additivity theorem says that the induced map on K-theory spaces K((C))K(C)×K(C) is a homotopy equivalence.[6] For dg-categories the statement is similar. Let C be a small pretriangulated dg-category with a semiorthogonal decomposition CC1,C2. Then the map of K-theory spectra K(C) → K(C1) ⊕ K(C2) is a homotopy equivalence.[7] In fact, K-theory is a universal functor satisfying this additivity property and Morita invariance.[1]

Category of finite sets

Consider the category of pointed finite sets. This category has an object k+={0,1,,k} for every natural number k, and the morphisms in this category are the functions f:m+n+ which preserve the zero element. A theorem of Barratt, Priddy and Quillen says that the algebraic K-theory of this category is a sphere spectrum.[4]

Miscellaneous

More generally in abstract category theory, the K-theory of a category is a type of decategorification in which a set is created from an equivalence class of objects in a stable (∞,1)-category, where the elements of the set inherit an Abelian group structure from the exact sequences in the category.[8]

Group completion method

The Grothendieck group construction is a functor from the category of rings to the category of abelian groups. The higher K-theory should then be a functor from the category of rings but to the category of higher objects such as simplicial abelian groups.

Topological Hochschild homology

Waldhausen introduced the idea of a trace map from the algebraic K-theory of a ring to its Hochschild homology; by way of this map, information can be obtained about the K-theory from the Hochschild homology. Bökstedt factorized this trace map, leading to the idea of a functor known as the topological Hochschild homology of the ring's Eilenberg–MacLane spectrum.[9]

K-theory of a simplicial ring

If R is a constant simplicial ring, then this is the same thing as K-theory of a ring.

See also

Notes

  1. 1.0 1.1 Tabuada, Goncalo (2008). "Higher K-theory via universal invariants". Duke Mathematical Journal. 145 (1): 121–206. arXiv:0706.2420. doi:10.1215/00127094-2008-049. S2CID 8886393.
  2. *Blumberg, Andrew J; Gepner, David; Tabuada, Gonçalo (2013-04-18). "A universal characterization of higher algebraic K-theory". Geometry & Topology. 17 (2): 733–838. arXiv:1001.2282. doi:10.2140/gt.2013.17.733. ISSN 1364-0380. S2CID 115177650.
  3. Boyarchenko, Mitya (4 November 2007). "K-theory of a Waldhausen category as a symmetric spectrum" (PDF).
  4. 4.0 4.1 Dundas, Bjørn Ian; Goodwillie, Thomas G.; McCarthy, Randy (2012-09-06). The Local Structure of Algebraic K-Theory. Springer Science & Business Media. ISBN 9781447143932.
  5. Staffeldt, Ross (1989). "On fundamental theorems of algebraic K-theory". K-theory. 2 (4): 511–532. doi:10.1007/bf00533280.
  6. Weibel, Charles (2013). "Chapter V: The Fundamental Theorems of higher K-theory". The K-book: an introduction to algebraic K-theory. Graduate Studies in Mathematics. Vol. 145. AMS.
  7. Tabuada, Gonçalo (2005). "Invariants additifs de dg-catégories". International Mathematics Research Notices. 2005 (53): 3309–3339. arXiv:math/0507227. Bibcode:2005math......7227T. doi:10.1155/IMRN.2005.3309. S2CID 119162782.
  8. "K-theory in nLab". ncatlab.org. Retrieved 22 August 2017.
  9. Schwänzl, R.; Vogt, R. M.; Waldhausen, F. (October 2000). "Topological Hochschild Homology". Journal of the London Mathematical Society. 62 (2): 345–356. CiteSeerX 10.1.1.1020.4419. doi:10.1112/s0024610700008929. ISSN 1469-7750. S2CID 122754654.

References

Further reading

For the recent ∞-category approach, see