Multiresolution analysis

From The Right Wiki
Jump to navigationJump to search

A multiresolution analysis (MRA) or multiscale approximation (MSA) is the design method of most of the practically relevant discrete wavelet transforms (DWT) and the justification for the algorithm of the fast wavelet transform (FWT). It was introduced in this context in 1988/89 by Stephane Mallat and Yves Meyer and has predecessors in the microlocal analysis in the theory of differential equations (the ironing method) and the pyramid methods of image processing as introduced in 1981/83 by Peter J. Burt, Edward H. Adelson and James L. Crowley.

Definition

A multiresolution analysis of the Lebesgue space L2() consists of a sequence of nested subspaces

{0}V1V0V1VnV(n+1)L2()

that satisfies certain self-similarity relations in time-space and scale-frequency, as well as completeness and regularity relations.

  • Self-similarity in time demands that each subspace Vk is invariant under shifts by integer multiples of 2k. That is, for each fVk,m the function g defined as g(x)=f(xm2k) also contained in Vk.
  • Self-similarity in scale demands that all subspaces VkVl,k>l, are time-scaled versions of each other, with scaling respectively dilation factor 2k-l. I.e., for each fVk there is a gVl with x:g(x)=f(2klx).
  • In the sequence of subspaces, for k>l the space resolution 2l of the l-th subspace is higher than the resolution 2k of the k-th subspace.
  • Regularity demands that the model subspace V0 be generated as the linear hull (algebraically or even topologically closed) of the integer shifts of one or a finite number of generating functions ϕ or ϕ1,,ϕr. Those integer shifts should at least form a frame for the subspace V0L2(), which imposes certain conditions on the decay at infinity. The generating functions are also known as scaling functions or father wavelets. In most cases one demands of those functions to be piecewise continuous with compact support.
  • Completeness demands that those nested subspaces fill the whole space, i.e., their union should be dense in L2(), and that they are not too redundant, i.e., their intersection should only contain the zero element.

Important conclusions

In the case of one continuous (or at least with bounded variation) compactly supported scaling function with orthogonal shifts, one may make a number of deductions. The proof of existence of this class of functions is due to Ingrid Daubechies. Assuming the scaling function has compact support, then V0V1 implies that there is a finite sequence of coefficients ak=2ϕ(x),ϕ(2xk) for |k|N, and ak=0 for |k|>N, such that

ϕ(x)=k=NNakϕ(2xk).

Defining another function, known as mother wavelet or just the wavelet

ψ(x):=k=NN(1)ka1kϕ(2xk),

one can show that the space W0V1, which is defined as the (closed) linear hull of the mother wavelet's integer shifts, is the orthogonal complement to V0 inside V1.[1] Or put differently, V1 is the orthogonal sum (denoted by ) of W0 and V0. By self-similarity, there are scaled versions Wk of W0 and by completeness one has

L2()=closure of kWk,

thus the set

{ψk,n(x)=2kψ(2kxn):k,n}

is a countable complete orthonormal wavelet basis in L2().

See also

References

  1. Mallat, S.G. "A Wavelet Tour of Signal Processing". www.di.ens.fr. Retrieved 2019-12-30.