Radical axis

From The Right Wiki
Jump to navigationJump to search
File:Potenz-gerade-def.svg
  Two circles, centered at M1, M2
  Radical axis, with sample point P
  Tangential distances from both circles to P
The tangent lines must be equal in length for any point on the radical axis: |PT1|=|PT2|. If P, T1, T2 lie on a common tangent, then P is the midpoint of T1T2.

In Euclidean geometry, the radical axis of two non-concentric circles is the set of points whose power with respect to the circles are equal. For this reason the radical axis is also called the power line or power bisector of the two circles. In detail: For two circles c1, c2 with centers M1, M2 and radii r1, r2 the powers of a point P with respect to the circles are

Π1(P)=|PM1|2r12,Π2(P)=|PM2|2r22.

Point P belongs to the radical axis, if

Π1(P)=Π2(P).

If the circles have two points in common, the radical axis is the common secant line of the circles.
If point P is outside the circles, P has equal tangential distance to both the circles.
If the radii are equal, the radical axis is the line segment bisector of M1, M2.
In any case the radical axis is a line perpendicular to M1M2.

On notations

The notation radical axis was used by the French mathematician M. Chasles as axe radical.[1]
J.V. Poncelet used chorde ideale.[2]
J. Plücker introduced the term Chordale.[3]
J. Steiner called the radical axis line of equal powers (German: Linie der gleichen Potenzen) which led to power line (Potenzgerade).[4]

Properties

Geometric shape and its position

Let x,m1,m2 be the position vectors of the points P,M1,M2. Then the defining equation of the radical line can be written as:

(xm1)2r12=(xm2)2r222x(m2m1)+m12m22+r22r12=0
File:Potenz-gerade-ber-d1d2.svg
Definition and calculation of d1,d2

From the right equation one gets

  • The pointset of the radical axis is indeed a line and is perpendicular to the line through the circle centers.

(m2m1 is a normal vector to the radical axis !) Dividing the equation by 2|m2m1|, one gets the Hessian normal form. Inserting the position vectors of the centers yields the distances of the centers to the radical axis:

d1=d2+r12r222d,d2=d2+r22r122d,
with d=|M1M2|=|m2m1|.

(di may be negative if L is not between M1,M2.) If the circles are intersecting at two points, the radical line runs through the common points. If they only touch each other, the radical line is the common tangent line.

Special positions

File:Potenz-gerade-var.svg
Radical axis: variations
  • The radical axis of two intersecting circles is their common secant line.
The radical axis of two touching circles is their common tangent.
The radical axis of two non intersecting circles is the common secant of two convenient equipower circles (see below Orthogonal cicles).

Orthogonal circles

File:Potenz-gerade-co.svg
The touching points of the tangents through P lie on the orthogonal circle (green)
  • For a point P outside a circle ci and the two tangent points Si,Ti the equation |PSi|2=|PTi|2=Πi(P) holds and Si,Ti lie on the circle co with center P and radius Πi(P). Circle co intersects ci orthogonal. Hence:
If P is a point of the radical axis, then the four points S1,T1,S2,T2 lie on circle co, which intersects the given circles c1,c2 orthogonally.
  • The radical axis consists of all centers of circles, which intersect the given circles orthogonally.

System of orthogonal circles

The method described in the previous section for the construction of a pencil of circles, which intersect two given circles orthogonally, can be extended to the construction of two orthogonally intersecting systems of circles:[5][6] Let c1,c2 be two apart lying circles (as in the previous section), M1,M2,r1,r2 their centers and radii and g12 their radical axis. Now, all circles will be determined with centers on line M1M2, which have together with c1 line g12 as radical axis, too. If γ2 is such a circle, whose center has distance δ to the center M1 and radius ρ2. From the result in the previous section one gets the equation

d1=δ2+r12ρ222δ, where d1>r1 are fixed.

With δ2=δd1 the equation can be rewritten as:

δ22=d12r12+ρ22.
File:Kreise-orth-sys-e.svg
System of orthogonal circles: construction

If radius ρ2 is given, from this equation one finds the distance δ2 to the (fixed) radical axis of the new center. In the diagram the color of the new circles is purple. Any green circle (see diagram) has its center on the radical axis and intersects the circles c1,c2 orthogonally and hence all new circles (purple), too. Choosing the (red) radical axis as y-axis and line M1M2 as x-axis, the two pencils of circles have the equations:

purple: (xδ2)2+y2=δ22+r12d12
green: x2+(yyg)2=yg2+d12r12.

((0,yg) is the center of a green circle.) Properties:
a) Any two green circles intersect on the x-axis at the points P1/2=(±d12r12,0), the poles of the orthogonal system of circles. That means, the x-axis is the radical line of the green circles.
b) The purple circles have no points in common. But, if one considers the real plane as part of the complex plane, then any two purple circles intersect on the y-axis (their common radical axis) at the points Q1/2=(0,±id12r12).

File:Kreis-sys-orth-pa.svg
Parabolic orthogonal system
File:Kreis-buesch-typen.svg
Coaxal circles: types

Special cases:
a) In case of d1=r1 the green circles are touching each other at the origin with the x-axis as common tangent and the purple circles have the y-axis as common tangent. Such a system of circles is called coaxal parabolic circles (see below).
b) Shrinking c1 to its center M1, i. e. r1=0, the equations turn into a more simple form and one gets M1=P1. Conclusion:
a) For any real w the pencil of circles

c(ξ):(xξ)2+y2ξ2w=0:
has the property: The y-axis is the radical axis of c(ξ1),c(ξ2).
In case of w>0 the circles c(ξ1),c(ξ2) intersect at points P1/2=(0,±w).
In case of w<0 they have no points in common.
In case of w=0 they touch at (0,0) and the y-axis is their common tangent.

b) For any real w the two pencils of circles

c1(ξ):(xξ)2+y2ξ2w=0,
c2(η):x2+(yη)2η2+w=0
form a system of orthogonal circles. That means: any two circles c1(ξ),c2(η) intersect orthogonally.

c) From the equations in b), one gets a coordinate free representation:

File:Kreise-orth-sys-p1p2.svg
Orthogonal system of circles to given poles P1,P2
For the given points P1,P2, their midpoint O and their line segment bisector g12 the two equations
|XM|2=|OM|2|OP1|2,
|XN|2=|ON|2+|OP1|2=|NP1|2
with M on P1P2, but not between P1,P2, and N on g12
describe the orthogonal system of circles uniquely determined by P1,P2 which are the poles of the system.
For P1=P2=O one has to prescribe the axes a1,a2 of the system, too. The system is parabolic:
|XM|2=|OM|2,|XN|2=|ON|2
with M on a1 and N on a2.

Straightedge and compass construction:

File:Kreise-os-konstr.svg
Orthogonal system of circles: straightedge and compass construction

A system of orthogonal circles is determined uniquely by its poles P1,P2:

  1. The axes (radical axes) are the lines P1P2 and the Line segment bisector g12 of the poles.
  2. The circles (green in the diagram) through P1,P2 have their centers on g12. They can be drawn easily. For a point N the radius is rN=|NP1|.
  3. In order to draw a circle of the second pencil (in diagram blue) with center M on P1P2, one determines the radius rM applying the theorem of Pythagoras: rM2=|OM|2|OP1|2 (see diagram).

In case of P1=P2 the axes have to be chosen additionally. The system is parabolic and can be drawn easily.

Coaxal circles

Definition and properties: Let c1,c2 be two circles and Π1,Π2 their power functions. Then for any λ1

  • Π1(x,y)λΠ2(x,y)=0

is the equation of a circle c(λ) (see below). Such a system of circles is called coaxal circles generated by the circles c1,c2. (In case of λ=1 the equation describes the radical axis of c1,c2.) [7][8] The power function of c(λ) is

Π(λ,x,y)=Π1(x,y)λΠ2(x,y)1λ.

The normed equation (the coefficients of x2,y2 are 1) of c(λ) is Π(λ,x,y)=0. A simple calculation shows:

  • c(λ),c(μ),λμ, have the same radical axis as c1,c2.

Allowing λ to move to infinity, one recognizes, that c1,c2 are members of the system of coaxal circles: c1=c(0),c2=c(). (E): If c1,c2 intersect at two points P1,P2, any circle c(λ) contains P1,P2, too, and line P1P2 is their common radical axis. Such a system is called elliptic.
(P): If c1,c2 are tangent at P, any circle is tangent to c1,c2 at point P, too. The common tangent is their common radical axis. Such a system is called parabolic.
(H): If c1,c2 have no point in common, then any pair of the system, too. The radical axis of any pair of circles is the radical axis of c1,c2. The system is called hyperbolic. In detail: Introducing coordinates such that

c1:(xd1)2+y2=r12
c2:(xd2)2+y2=d22+r12d12,

then the y-axis is their radical axis (see above). Calculating the power function Π(λ,x,y) gives the normed circle equation:

c(λ):x2+y22d1λd21λx+d12r12=0.

Completing the square and the substitution δ2=d1λd21λ (x-coordinate of the center) yields the centered form of the equation

c(λ):(xδ2)2+y2=δ22+r12d12.

In case of r1>d1 the circles c1,c2,c(λ) have the two points

P1=(0,r12d12),P2=(0,r12d12)

in common and the system of coaxal circles is elliptic. In case of r1=d1 the circles c1,c2,c(λ) have point P0=(0,0) in common and the system is parabolic. In case of r1<d1 the circles c1,c2,c(λ) have no point in common and the system is hyperbolic. Alternative equations:
1) In the defining equation of a coaxal system of circles there can be used multiples of the power functions, too.
2) The equation of one of the circles can be replaced by the equation of the desired radical axis. The radical axis can be seen as a circle with an infinitely large radius. For example:

(xx1)2+y2r12λ2(xx2)=0
(x(x1+λ))2+y2=(x1+λ)2+r12x122λx2,

describes all circles, which have with the first circle the line x=x2 as radical axis.
3) In order to express the equal status of the two circles, the following form is often used:

μΠ1(x,y)+νΠ2(x,y)=0.

But in this case the representation of a circle by the parameters μ,ν is not unique. Applications:
a) Circle inversions and Möbius transformations preserve angles and generalized circles. Hence orthogonal systems of circles play an essential role with investigations on these mappings.[9][10]
b) In electromagnetism coaxal circles appear as field lines.[11]

Radical center of three circles, construction of the radical axis

File:Potenz-gerade-3k.svg
Radical center of three circles
The green circle intersects the three circles orthogonally.
  • For three circles c1,c2,c3, no two of which are concentric, there are three radical axes g12,g23,g31. If the circle centers do not lie on a line, the radical axes intersect in a common point R, the radical center of the three circles. The orthogonal circle centered around R of two circles is orthogonal to the third circle, too (radical circle).
Proof: the radical axis gik contains all points which have equal tangential distance to the circles ci,ck. The intersection point R of g12 and g23 has the same tangential distance to all three circles. Hence R is a point of the radical axis g31, too.
This property allows one to construct the radical axis of two non intersecting circles c1,c2 with centers M1,M2: Draw a third circle c3 with center not collinear to the given centers that intersects c1,c2. The radical axes g13,g23 can be drawn. Their intersection point is the radical center R of the three circles and lies on g12. The line through R which is perpendicular to M1M2 is the radical axis g12.

Additional construction method:

File:Potenz-gerade-konstr-e.svg
Construction of the radical axis with circles c'1,c'2 of equal power. It is Π1(P1)=Π2(P2).

All points which have the same power to a given circle c lie on a circle concentric to c. Let us call it an equipower circle. This property can be used for an additional construction method of the radical axis of two circles: For two non intersecting circles c1,c2, there can be drawn two equipower circles c'1,c'2, which have the same power with respect to c1,c2 (see diagram). In detail: Π1(P1)=Π2(P2). If the power is large enough, the circles c'1,c'2 have two points in common, which lie on the radical axis g12.

Relation to bipolar coordinates

In general, any two disjoint, non-concentric circles can be aligned with the circles of a system of bipolar coordinates. In that case, the radical axis is simply the y-axis of this system of coordinates. Every circle on the axis that passes through the two foci of the coordinate system intersects the two circles orthogonally. A maximal collection of circles, all having centers on a given line and all pairs having the same radical axis, is known as a pencil of coaxal circles.

Radical center in trilinear coordinates

If the circles are represented in trilinear coordinates in the usual way, then their radical center is conveniently given as a certain determinant. Specifically, let X = x : y : z denote a variable point in the plane of a triangle ABC with sidelengths a = |BC|, b = |CA|, c = |AB|, and represent the circles as follows:

(dx + ey + fz)(ax + by + cz) + g(ayz + bzx + cxy) = 0
(hx + iy + jz)(ax + by + cz) + k(ayz + bzx + cxy) = 0
(lx + my + nz)(ax + by + cz) + p(ayz + bzx + cxy) = 0

Then the radical center is the point

det[gkpeimfjn]:det[gkpfjndhl]:det[gkpdhleim].

Radical plane and hyperplane

The radical plane of two nonconcentric spheres in three dimensions is defined similarly: it is the locus of points from which tangents to the two spheres have the same length.[12] The fact that this locus is a plane follows by rotation in the third dimension from the fact that the radical axis is a straight line. The same definition can be applied to hyperspheres in Euclidean space of any dimension, giving the radical hyperplane of two nonconcentric hyperspheres.

Notes

  1. Michel Chasles, C. H. Schnuse: Die Grundlehren der neuern Geometrie, erster Theil, Verlag Leibrock, Braunschweig, 1856, p. 312
  2. Ph. Fischer: Lehrbuch der analytische Geometrie, Darmstadt 1851, Verlag Ernst Kern, p. 67
  3. H. Schwarz: Die Elemente der analytischen Geometrie der Ebene, Verlag H. W. Schmidt, Halle, 1858, p. 218
  4. Jakob Steiner: Einige geometrische Betrachtungen. In: Journal für die reine und angewandte Mathematik, Band 1, 1826, p. 165
  5. A. Schoenfliess, R. Courant: Einführung in die Analytische Geometrie der Ebene und des Raumes, Springer-Verlag, 1931, p. 113
  6. C. Carathéodory: Funktionentheorie, Birkhäuser-Verlag, Basel, 1961, ISBN 978-3-7643-0064-7, p. 46
  7. Dan Pedoe: Circles: A Mathematical View, mathematical Association of America, 2020, ISBN 9781470457327, p. 16
  8. R. Lachlan: An Elementary Treatise On Modern Pure Geometry, MacMillan&Co, New York,1893, p. 200
  9. Carathéodory: Funktionentheorie, p. 47.
  10. R. Sauer: Ingenieur-Mathematik: Zweiter Band: Differentialgleichungen und Funktionentheorie, Springer-Verlag, 1962, ISBN 978-3-642-53232-0, p. 105
  11. Clemens Schaefer: Elektrodynamik und Optik, Verlag: De Gruyter, 1950, ISBN 978-3-11-230936-0, p. 358.
  12. See Merriam–Webster online dictionary.

References

  • R. A. Johnson (1960). Advanced Euclidean Geometry: An Elementary Treatise on the Geometry of the Triangle and the Circle (reprint of 1929 edition by Houghton Mifflin ed.). New York: Dover Publications. pp. 31–43. ISBN 978-0-486-46237-0.

Further reading

External links