Sterbenz lemma

From The Right Wiki
Jump to navigationJump to search

In floating-point arithmetic, the Sterbenz lemma or Sterbenz's lemma[1] is a theorem giving conditions under which floating-point differences are computed exactly. It is named after Pat H. Sterbenz, who published a variant of it in 1974.[2]

Sterbenz lemma — In a floating-point number system with subnormal numbers, if x and y are floating-point numbers such that y2x2y, then xy is also a floating-point number. Thus, a correctly rounded floating-point subtraction xy=fl(xy)=xy is computed exactly.

The Sterbenz lemma applies to IEEE 754, the most widely used floating-point number system in computers.

Proof

Let β be the radix of the floating-point system and p the precision. Consider several easy cases first:

  • If x is zero then xy=y, and if y is zero then xy=x, so the result is trivial because floating-point negation is always exact.
  • If x=y the result is zero and thus exact.
  • If x<0 then we must also have y/2x<0 so y<0. In this case, xy=(xy), so the result follows from the theorem restricted to x,y0.
  • If xy, we can write xy=(yx) with x/2y2x, so the result follows from the theorem restricted to xy.

For the rest of the proof, assume 0<y<x2y without loss of generality. Write x,y>0 in terms of their positive integral significands sx,syβp1 and minimal exponents ex,ey: x=sxβexp+1y=syβeyp+1 Note that x and y may be subnormal—we do not assume sx,syβp1. The subtraction gives: xy=sxβexp+1syβeyp+1=sxβexeyβeyp+1syβeyp+1=(sxβexeysy)βeyp+1. Let s=sxβexeysy. Since 0<y<x we have:

  • eyex, so exey0, from which we can conclude βexey is an integer and therefore so is s=sxβexeysy; and
  • xy>0, so s>0.

Further, since x2y, we have xyy, so that sβeyp+1=xyy=syβeyp+1 which implies that 0<ssyβp1. Hence xy=sβeyp+1,for0<sβp1, so xy is a floating-point number. ∎ Note: Even if x and y are normal, i.e., sx,syβp1, we cannot prove that sβp1 and therefore cannot prove that xy is also normal. For example, the difference of the two smallest positive normal floating-point numbers x=(βp1+1)βeminp+1 and y=βp1βeminp+1 is xy=1βeminp+1 which is necessarily subnormal. In floating-point number systems without subnormal numbers, such as CPUs in nonstandard flush-to-zero mode instead of the standard gradual underflow, the Sterbenz lemma does not apply.

Relation to catastrophic cancellation

The Sterbenz lemma may be contrasted with the phenomenon of catastrophic cancellation:

  • The Sterbenz lemma asserts that if x and y are sufficiently close floating-point numbers then their difference xy is computed exactly by floating-point arithmetic xy=fl(xy), with no rounding needed.
  • The phenomenon of catastrophic cancellation is that if x~ and y~ are approximations to true numbers x and y—whether the approximations arise from prior rounding error or from series truncation or from physical uncertainty or anything else—the error of the difference x~y~ from the desired difference xy is inversely proportional to xy. Thus, the closer x and y are, the worse x~y~ may be as an approximation to xy, even if the subtraction itself is computed exactly.

In other words, the Sterbenz lemma shows that subtracting nearby floating-point numbers is exact, but if the numbers one has are approximations then even their exact difference may be far off from the difference of numbers one wanted to subtract.

Use in numerical analysis

The Sterbenz lemma is instrumental in proving theorems on error bounds in numerical analysis of floating-point algorithms. For example, Heron's formula A=s(sa)(sb)(sc) for the area of triangle with side lengths a, b, and c, where s=(a+b+c)/2 is the semi-perimeter, may give poor accuracy for long narrow triangles if evaluated directly in floating-point arithmetic. However, for abc, the alternative formula A=14(a+(b+c))(c(ab))(c+(ab))(a+(bc)) can be proven, with the help of the Sterbenz lemma, to have low forward error for all inputs.[3][4][5]

References

  1. Muller, Jean-Michel; Brunie, Nicolas; de Dinechin, Florent; Jeannerod, Claude-Pierre; Joldes, Mioara; Lefèvre, Vincent; Melquiond, Guillaume; Revol, Nathalie; Torres, Serge (2018). Handbook of Floating-Point Arithmetic (2nd ed.). Gewerbestrasse 11, 6330 Cham, Switzerland: Birkhäuser. Lemma 4.1, p. 101. doi:10.1007/978-3-319-76526-6. ISBN 978-3-319-76525-9.{{cite book}}: CS1 maint: location (link)
  2. Sterbenz, Pat H. (1974). Floating-Point Computation. Englewood Cliffs, NJ, United States: Prentice-Hall. Theorem 4.3.1 and Corollary, p. 138. ISBN 0-13-322495-3.
  3. Kahan, W. (2014-09-04). "Miscalculating Area and Angles of a Needle-like Triangle" (PDF). Lecture Notes for Introductory Numerical Analysis Classes. Retrieved 2020-09-17.
  4. Goldberg, David (March 1991). "What every computer scientist should know about floating-point arithmetic". ACM Computing Surveys. 23 (1). New York, NY, United States: Association for Computing Machinery: 5–48. doi:10.1145/103162.103163. ISSN 0360-0300. S2CID 222008826. Retrieved 2020-09-17.
  5. Boldo, Sylvie (April 2013). Nannarelli, Alberto; Seidel, Peter-Michael; Tang, Ping Tak Peter (eds.). How to Compute the Area of a Triangle: a Formal Revisit. 21st IEEE Symposium on Computer Arithmetic. IEEE Computer Society. pp. 91–98. doi:10.1109/ARITH.2013.29. ISBN 978-0-7695-4957-6. ISSN 1063-6889.